Instrumented L5-S1 interbody graft with IFUSE implant using the reverse Bohlman technique.

BACKGROUND: In case of high sacral slope, anterior lumbosacral fusions can be performed by retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach using a reversed Bohlman technique with an autologous corticocancellous fibular graft. The use of a trans-lumbosacral implant can avoid the iatrogenic effects but currently, there is no implant specifically designed for this fusion technique. Could the IFUSE implant from SI BONE replace a fibular graft to avoiding the iatrogenic effect induced by sampling during a Reverse Bohlman technique? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with L5S1 interbody pseudarthrosis after posterior fixation for grade 2 L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with isthmic lysis of L5, and that of a 69-year-old woman who underwent a posterior T4 fusion to the pelvis for degenerative scoliosis. Both required a trans-lumbosacral instrumented fusion via an anterior approach using the reverse Bohlman technique. Surgical technique was described. RESULTS: There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At 6 months, the patients reported a decrease in lumbar and radicular symptomatology. There were no infectious, neurological or vascular complications. CT-scans confirmed the good position and stability of the IFUSE implant. DISCUSSION: We present an innovative interbody grafting technique adapted to spines with high pelvic incidence. The surgical technique is safe, minimally invasive, and reduces surgical iatrogeny. The short and medium-term results are positive but require longer-term follow-up and a larger cohort.

Quantifying the Spinal Lordosis Ratio Unique to the Type of Spinal Sagittal Alignment in a Normal Population.

STUDY DESIGN: Data collection of radiological parameters in non-pathological adult spines. OBJECTIVES: Establishing a baseline database for measurements of the spinal lordosis ratio between upper and lower arcs of the lumbar spine unique to each type of spine described by Roussouly's classification. Illustrating the importance of correct rationing of the upper and lower arcs. METHODS: Standardised standing true lateral plain radiographs of the spine (including base of skull and proximal femurs) from 373 adult volunteers were obtained. Exclusion criteria : any history of disease involving the spine, pelvis, hips or lower limbs. Incidental detection of any spinal deformity on radiography also excluded further participation in this study. Sacro-pelvic parameters data collected : Pelvic Incidence (PI), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Sacral Slope (SS), location of Inflection Point, number of vertebras in the spinal lordosis and type of Roussouly's spine. Values of upper arc, lower arc and spinal lordosis ratio (SLR) was determined. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis revealed statistically significant (P < .0001) correlation between the types of sagittal spinal alignments based on Roussouly's classification and the SLR. Type 1: SLR .76 ± .17, Type 2: SLR .60 ± .18, Type 3 with anteverted pelvis: SLR .53 ± .11, Type 3: SLR .49 ± .12, Type4: SLR .41 ± .11. CONCLUSION: With this data we are able to quantify the ratio of lumbar lordosis unique to each type of Roussouly's spine. It functions as a guide when planning lumbar spine surgeries in order to restore the SLR correctly and thus prevent post-op complications such as proximal junction kyphosis.

Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To report radiographic and functional outcomes, with an average follow-up of 20 years, of adolescents treated surgically for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis by hybrid construct using only pedicular screws for the distal fixation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients. Radiographic data were evaluated on fullspine radiographs (Cobb angle, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis). Clinical data were evaluated with ODI, SF-12, SRS-30 and Analog Pain Scale. Disc height and listhesis below the arthrodesis were measured. RESULTS: We analyzed 90 women and 19 men with a mean age of 16.9 y.o. at surgery. Radiographic data were assessed for 46 patients after 17.4 years. Mean preoperative Cobb angle was 58°, mean correction 40.1% with 5.3° of loss at final FU. Lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis increased significantly at last FU. Degenerative changes below the arthrodesis were reported in 5 cases. Clinical data were assessed for 42 patients after 19.9 years: SRS-30 3.8; ODI 12.3%; SF-12 PCS 48.6 and MCS 46. Low back pain was reported in 69% of cases with low intensity (3.1). The lowest instrumented vertebrae did not influence significantly the functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of thoracic AIS with lumbar or thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation provides good radiological and clinical outcomes at very long term. The reduction in the coronal plane is stable; the HRQoL is quite as good as the general population. The degenerative evolution below remain relatively rare, therefore global sagittal balance is not modified.

Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion.

Not restoring the adequate lumbar lordosis during lumbar fusion surgery may result in mechanical low back pain, sagittal unbalance and adjacent segment degeneration. The objective of this work is to describe the current strategies and concepts for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery. Theoretical lordosis can be evaluated from the measurement of the pelvic incidence and from the analysis of spatial organization of the lumbar spine with 2/3 of the lordosis given by the L4-S1 segment and 85% by the L3-S1 segment. Technical aspects involve patient positioning on the operating table, release maneuvers, type of instrumentation used (rod, screw-rod connection, interbody cages), surgical sequence and the overall surgical strategy. Spinal osteotomies may be required in case of fixed kyphotic spine. AP combined surgery is particularly efficient in restoring lordosis at L5-S1 level and should be recommended. Finally, not one but several strategies may be used to achieve the need for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery.