A Novel Absorbable Stapler Provides Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Noninferior to Subcuticular Skin Closure: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Deep dermal suturing is critical for scar quality outcomes. The authors evaluated a new, fast medical device for dermal suturing, with the hypothesis of noninferiority with regard to clinical scar and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A prospective, patient-blind, randomized, multicenter noninferiority study in 26 French hospitals was conducted. Patients were randomized 1:1 to suturing with conventional thread or a semiautomatic stapler. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale was rated at 3 months for primary endpoint effectiveness. Secondary endpoints were cost-effectiveness of the two suturing methods, prevalence of complications, suturing/operating time, Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Patient Scar Assessment Scale score, scar aesthetic quality 18 months after surgery, and occupational exposure to blood during surgery. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-four patients were enrolled, 660 were randomized, and 649 constituted the full analysis (stapler arm, n = 324; needle arm, n = 325). Primary endpoint Patient Scar Assessment Scale score in the stapler arm was not inferior to that in the needle arm at 3 months or after 18 months. The mean operating time was 180 minutes in the stapler arm and 179 minutes in the needle arm (p = not significant). The mean suturing time was significantly lower in the stapler arm (p < 0.001). There were seven occupational exposures to blood in the needle arm and one in the stapler arm. The two arms did not differ significantly in terms of complications (p = 0.41). The additional cost of using the device was &OV0556;51.57 for the complete-case population. CONCLUSION: Wound healing outcome was no worse than with conventional suturing using a semiautomatic stapler and associated with less occupational exposure to blood. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

[Clinical practice for morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients: A french multicentric study]. / Réalité de la prise en charge du cancer de l'endomètre chez les patientes en obésité morbide : étude française bicentrique.

INTRODUCTION: Morbid obesity may lead to difficulties for management of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was the assessment of management of endometrial cancer for morbidly obese women and the implementation of recommendations. METHODS: this is retrospective study including women with BMI =40kg/m2 treated for endometrial cancer between November 2010 and April 2017 in the university hospital in Nantes and the Cancer Center René Gauducheau in Nantes. Patients' demographics, pre-operative intra operative, post-operative data and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria with a median age of 65.5 (28-86) and a median BMI of 47kg/m2 (40-60). Type I histologic was identified in 90% and of a stage I FIGO I in 75% of the cases. All the patients have benefited from a biopsy of endometrium before surgery. 70% of the patients have benefited from a MRI before surgery (14/20). The surgery was realized by laparotomy in 40%, by mini invasive surgery in 50% and by vaginal procedure in 10% of. Mini invasive surgery was converted in laparotomy in 40% (4/10). A discrepancy of the ESMO's recommandation was observed in 40% of the cases (8/20). Two patients did not benefit from the adjuvant radiotherapy recommended because of delay of healing. DISCUSSION: Although good prognosis, the endometrial cancer of morbidly obese women seem to be under treat. These patients do not seem benefited an optimal pre-operative assessment. The surgery is mainly realized by laparotomy with a not complete surgical stadification for one more than a third of the patients.

Migration of a contraceptive subcutaneous device into the pulmonary artery. Report of a case.

The case is about an 18 year-old woman who benefited of a radiopaque contraceptive implant (Nexplanon) inserted in the left arm. When she wanted to remove it, it couldn't be found by palpation, US, CT and MRI. A CXR and a thoracic CT scan were necessary to locate the implant, and the implant was removed by endovascular procedures.Significant migration of a contraceptive implant is uncommon, and only one case of migration far from the insertion limb has been reported. Using radiopaque contraceptive implants like Nexplanon could locate them easier if a migration occurs.

•We couldn't locate a radiopaque contraceptive implant in the insertion limb.•We located it in a distal pulmonary artery by performing chest radiography and CT scan.•We removed it by endovascular procedure with a loop snare•We have to perform chest radiography in case of non-visible implant in the arm.