Positive Emotion Dysregulation Identifies Trauma-Exposed Community Individuals at Risk for Suicide and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury.

ABSTRACT: Emotion dysregulation is associated with increased risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). However, research in this area has focused almost exclusively on dysregulation stemming from negative emotions. The present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by examining the associations between the specific domains of positive emotion dysregulation and both STBs and NSSI. Participants included 397 trauma-exposed community adults (Mage = 35.95; 57.7% female; 76.8% White). Results demonstrated significant associations between positive emotion dysregulation and both STBs and NSSI. In particular, higher levels of nonacceptance of positive emotions were found to be significantly related to risk for STBs (versus no risk), higher severity of STBs, and history of NSSI (versus no history). Findings suggest positive emotion dysregulation may play an important role in the etiology and treatment of both STBs and NSSI among trauma-exposed individuals.

Do Difficulties Regulating Positive Emotions Contribute to Risky Sexual Behavior? A Path Analysis.

Within the U.S., risky sexual behavior (RSB) is the primary mode of HIV transmission. The role of emotion dysregulation in RSB has received growing attention over the past decade. However, this literature has been limited in its focus on emotion dysregulation stemming from negative (but not positive) emotions. The goal of the current study was to extend research by examining the relative and unique contributions of dimensions of difficulties regulating positive emotions (i.e., nonacceptance of positive emotions [Accept], difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors when experiencing positive emotions [Impulse], and difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors when experiencing positive emotions [Goals]) to RSB. Participants were 386 trauma-exposed individuals recruited from Amazon's MTurk (M age = 35.85 years; 57.5% female; 76.4% White). At the bivariate level, dimensions of difficulties regulating positive emotions were significantly positively associated with sexual risk taking with uncommitted partners, impulsive sex behaviors, and intent to engage in risky sexual behaviors (with the exception of Goals to sexual risk taking with uncommitted partners), and significantly negatively associated with risky sex acts. Regarding the unique contributions of difficulties regulating positive emotions to RSB, (1) Accept was significantly positively associated with impulsive sexual behaviors and intent to engage in risky sexual behaviors; (2) Impulse was significantly positively associated with risky anal sex acts; and (3) Goals was significantly negatively associated with risky anal sex acts. Findings suggest the potential utility of targeting difficulties regulating positive emotions in treatments aimed at reducing RSB.

Confirmatory validation of the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive.

OBJECTIVES: Emotion dysregulation is a transdiagnostic factor central to the etiology and treatment of various clinical difficulties. Yet, research in this area has focused almost exclusively on emotion dysregulation stemming from negative emotions. The current study confirmed the factor structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive (DERS-P) and further examined its reliability and validity. METHOD: Participants in Study 1 were 229 college students (M age = 19.37 years; 66.8% female; 67.2% White). Participants in Study 2 were 353 trauma-exposed community individuals ( M age = 35.77 years; 57.8% female; 71.2% White). RESULTS: Findings supported the three-factor structure of the DERS-P. Mean levels of the DERS-P scales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity and differentiated individuals with (vs. without) probable posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, alcohol use, and drug use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide additional support for the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the DERS-P, thereby adding to its clinical utility.

Heterogeneity in emotion regulation difficulties among women victims of domestic violence: A latent profile analysis.

BACKGROUND: Research over the past two decades supports emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor related to the etiology, maintenance, and treatment of a wide range of psychiatric difficulties and risky behaviors. However, prior investigations are limited by their focus on difficulties regulating negative (but not positive) emotions. Further, research has not accounted for the heterogeneity in difficulties regulating emotions. METHODS: Participants were 210 female victims of domestic violence (DV; M age = 36.14, 48.6% African American) who completed measures assessing emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Positive), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale), depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), alcohol misuse (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test) and drug misuse (Drug Abuse Screening Test). Latent profile analysis was utilized to identify subgroups of DV-victimized women who were similar in endorsed difficulties in regulating negative and positive emotions. Differences in psychiatric difficulties (i.e., PTSD and depressive symptom severity) and risky behaviors (i.e., alcohol and drug misuse) were examined across these classes. RESULTS: Three classes of DV-victimized women differentiated by levels of difficulties regulating negative and positive emotions were identified. Greater psychiatric difficulties were found among classes defined by higher levels of difficulties regulating emotions, regardless of emotion valence. Risky behaviors were more prevalent among the class defined by higher levels of difficulties regulating both negative and positive emotions. LIMITATIONS: Although results add to the literature on difficulties regulating emotions and their correlates, findings must be interpreted in light of limitations present including use of a cross-sectional and correlation design, reliance on self-report measures, and assessment of a select sample of women victims of DV. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the potential importance of tailoring interventions accounting for the heterogeneity in negative and positive emotion regulation dimensions among DV-victimized women.