Implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control in Mozambican health care facilities.

SETTING: District and urban health care facilities in three provinces (Manica, Sofala, Tete) in central Mozambique. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of implementation of selected tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB-IPC) measures. DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study of TB-IPC implementation in 29 health care facilities, we assessed TB clinics, laboratories, out-patient departments and medical and TB wards. Assessment included selected managerial, administrative and environmental measures and the availability and use of respiratory protective equipment (N95 respirators). RESULTS: Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of (presumptive) TB patients were not present in all facilities. Staff instructed patients on sputum collection in 91%, but only 4% observed it. Using a pragmatic '20% rule', 52% of the rooms assessed had adequate ventilation. Potentially, this could be increased to 76%. Three quarters of the health care workers had N95 respirators. Only 36% knew how to use it correctly. CONCLUSION: Implementation of TB-IPC measures showed wide variations within health care facilities. Relatively simple measures to improve TB-IPC include the availability of guidelines, opening doors and windows to improve ventilation, and training and support on correct N95 respirator use. However, even relatively simple measures are challenging to implement, and require careful attention in and evaluation of the implementation process.

Treatment practices in patients with suspected malaria in Provincial Hospital of Tete, Mozambique.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, parasite-based diagnosis by microscopy or malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) is universally promoted before malaria treatment. However, studies on adherence of primary caregivers to malaria test results have provided conflicting results. METHODS: The antimalarial and antibiotic prescription rates in patients with suspected malaria at Provincial Hospital of Tete, Mozambique, and the features associated with antibiotic prescription in non-severely ill parasite-negative patients were assessed. RESULTS: In March and April 2010, Plasmodium falciparum malaria was diagnosed by microscopy or RDT in 728 (27.2%) of 2672 patients tested. Almost all malaria patients were prescribed antimalarials and 20% were also given antibiotics. Of 1944 parasite-negative patients, 126 (6.5%) were prescribed antimalarials and 1213 (62.4%) antibiotics. Among non-severely ill parasite-negative patients with complete information (n = 1607), the antibiotic prescription rate was 68.8% and was more frequent with respiratory symptoms and leukocyte counts >10 000/µL (adjusted OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.18-2.23 and adjusted OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.66-2.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to malaria test results was good in this reference setting, but antibiotic prescription was relatively frequent in clinically stable non-malaria patients. Optimal management of parasite-negative patients must be further defined along with programmatic deployment of the parasite-based strategy.