Door-to-door Screening as a New Model Augmenting School Eye Screening: Reaching Out to School Age Children in the Midst of a Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Explore door-to-door eye screening in India as a model to reach school age children in need of eye care, especially during school closures due to the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: Children between 5 and 18 years were screened in an urban-slum of Delhi from September 2020 to March 2021. Screening included capturing ocular complaints, visual acuity and conducting a torchlight examination. Children with any eye-related complaints, gross abnormality or a LogMAR acuity of more than 0.2 in either eye were referred to the nearby vision centre. Data were disaggregated by gender and age group. Reporting after referral and proportion of true positives referrals were used to assess the model. RESULTS: 32,857 children were screened. 55% were boys. Only 917 children (2.8%) had previous eye examinations. 1814 (5.5%) children were referred. Overall compliance rate amongst those referred was 59% (1070 of 1814) and compliance was significantly higher (72%) amongst those referred with poor vision as compared to those with only ocular morbidities (38%). Overall compliance was significantly higher amongst older age group (64% vs 50%) and amongst girls than boys (61% vs 56%). 3.9% children were detected with refractive error (RE) and 2.5% with uncorrected RE which was significantly higher in girls and in older age group. Of 1070 children reporting after referral, 85% had confirmed diagnosis for RE or other ocular pathology. CONCLUSION: Door-to-door screening had good referral compliance and positive predictive value. We recommend this model as a supplement to school screening especially in regions with low enrolment and high absenteeism in schools.

Out-of-School Vision Screening in North India: Estimating the Magnitude of Need.

Purpose : Few studies have examined the extent to which school-based vision screening is sufficient to achieve universal coverage among school-aged children in India. Method : A rural administrative region ('Block') was examined. Government records provided the total population of the rural Block, the proportion of school-aged children, and school authorities in the Block provided the number of enrolled students. Absenteeism was measured directly by visiting a representative sample of the schools. The proportion of the school age population found in school was assessed using the indicator, Effective Coverage (EC): the proportion of children attending school divided by the total population of school-aged children in the region. Results : In the rural block, the proportion of children actually enrolled in school was 52% of the school-aged population, with 68% of them attending school. Therefore, EC was 35% (68% of the 52% enrolled). Conclusion : Population coverage by school vision screening would be unacceptably low in a rural setting in northern India. Out-of-school vision screening programs are needed in these rural settings to achieve universal coverage.

Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction performed at school screening camps.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare noncycloplegic refraction performed in school camp with that performed in eye clinic in children aged 6-16 years. Methods: A prospective study of children with unaided vision <0.2 LogMAR who underwent noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR) and subjective refraction (SR) in camp and subsequently in eye clinic between February and March 2017 was performed. A masked optometrist performed refractions in both settings. The agreement between refraction values obtained at both settings was compared using the Bland-Altman analysis. Results: A total of 217 eyes were included in this study. Between the school camp and eye clinic, the mean absolute error ± standard deviation in spherical equivalent (SE) of NCR was 0.33 ± 0.4D and that of SR was 0.26 ± 0.5D. The limits of agreement for NCR were +0.91D to - 1.09D and for SR was +1.15D to -1.06D. The mean absolute error in SE was ≤0.5D in 92.62% eyes (95% confidence interval 88%-95%). Conclusion: A certain degree of variability exists between noncycloplegic refraction done in school camps and eye clinic. It was found to be accurate within 0.5D of SE in 92.62% eyes for refractive errors up to 4.5D of myopia, 3D of cylinder, and 1.5D of hyperopia.