Detection of middle ear cholesteatoma by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: multishot echo-planar imaging compared with single-shot echo-planar imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous reports have shown that DWI is useful in detecting cholesteatoma. SS-EPI is the most widely used DWI technique. However, SS-EPI may have susceptibility artifacts due to field inhomogeneity in the imaging of the temporal bone region. Our purpose was to prospectively evaluate the advantage of MS-EPI for the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma by comparing it with SS-EPI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 29 patients with preoperatively suspected acquired cholesteatoma. Each patient underwent an MR imaging examination including both SS-EPI and MS-EPI by using a 1.5T MR imaging scanner. Images of the 29 patients (58 temporal bones including 30 with and 28 without cholesteatoma) were reviewed by 2 independent neuroradiologists. The confidence level for the presence of cholesteatoma was graded on a scale of 0-2 (0 = none, 1 = equivocal, 2 = definite). Interobserver agreement as well as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed for the 2 readers. RESULTS: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for both MS-EPI (κ = 0.856) and SS-EPI (κ = 0.820). MS-EPI was associated with higher sensitivity (76.7%) and accuracy (87.9%) than SS-EPI (sensitivity = 50.0%, accuracy = 74.1%) (P < .05), while both methods showed 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SS-EPI, MS-EPI improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of acquired middle ear cholesteatomas.

Subsequent fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty can be predicted on preoperative multidetector row CT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Subsequent fracture is often seen after percutaneous vertebroplasty. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate preoperative multidetector row CT (MDCT) for the prediction of subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 26 consecutive patients (18 women and 8 men) with osteoporotic compression fractures (58 vertebrae). A 64-section MDCT with multiplanar reformation was obtained 1 day before the procedure. Subsequent MR imaging was used to evaluate new fractures at least 3 months after treatment on a routine basis or if there was recurrent pain. We used logistic regression analysis with MDCT findings and clinical data for statistical evaluation according to the location of new fractures. RESULTS: Subsequent fractures were noted at 14 adjacent vertebrae (12.1%) in 13 patients and at 14 remote vertebrae in 6 patients (23.1%). Subsequent fractures in adjacent vertebrae tended to occur in small vertebrae before treatment (P < .05). Steroid medication and low CT value in nonfractured vertebrae were associated with subsequent fractures in remote vertebrae (P < .05). Further collapse of the treated vertebral bodies was noted in 10 patients (11 vertebrae [19.0%]) without specific findings (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The small size of the treated vertebrae may relate to subsequent fractures in adjacent vertebrae. Steroid use and low CT value of nonfractured vertebrae on preoperative MDCT can be associated with subsequent fractures in remote vertebrae.