Functional MRI Neurofeedback Outperforms Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Reducing Tinnitus Distress: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the current standard treatment for chronic severe tinnitus; however, preliminary evidence suggests that real-time functional MRI (fMRI) neurofeedback therapy may be more effective. Purpose To compare the efficacy of real-time fMRI neurofeedback against CBT for reducing chronic tinnitus distress. Materials and Methods In this prospective controlled trial, participants with chronic severe tinnitus were randomized from December 2017 to December 2021 to receive either CBT (CBT group) for 10 weekly group sessions or real-time fMRI neurofeedback (fMRI group) individually during 15 weekly sessions. Change in the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score (range, 0-100) from baseline to 6 or 12 months was assessed. Secondary outcomes included four quality-of-life questionnaires (Beck Depression Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule). Questionnaire scores between treatment groups and between time points were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance and the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results The fMRI group included 21 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 11.4 [SD]; 16 male participants) and the CBT group included 22 participants (mean age, 53.6 years ± 8.8; 16 male participants). The fMRI group showed a greater reduction in THI scores compared with the CBT group at both 6 months (mean score change, -28.21 points ± 18.66 vs -12.09 points ± 18.86; P = .005) and 12 months (mean score change, -30 points ± 25.44 vs -4 points ± 17.2; P = .01). Compared with baseline, the fMRI group showed improved sleep (mean score, 8.62 points ± 4.59 vs 7.25 points ± 3.61; P = .006) and trait anxiety (mean score, 44 points ± 11.5 vs 39.84 points ± 10.5; P = .02) at 1 month and improved depression (mean score, 13.71 points ± 9.27 vs 6.53 points ± 5.17; P = .01) and general functioning (mean score, 24.91 points ± 17.05 vs 13.06 points ± 10.1; P = .01) at 6 months. No difference in these metrics over time was observed for the CBT group (P value range, .14 to >.99). Conclusion Real-time fMRI neurofeedback therapy led to a greater reduction in tinnitus distress than the current standard treatment of CBT. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT05737888; Swiss Ethics registration no.: BASEC2017-00813 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

[Parosmia and phantosmia: clinical update]. / Parosmie et fantosmie: mise à jour.

Olfactory disorders became known by large parts of the population since the Covid-19 pandemic. The causes of olfactory dysfunctions are manifold. Similar to other sensory impairments the disruption can be qualitative or quantitative. Quantitative olfactory disorders such as anosmia or hyposmia are well explored, whereas the knowledge on qualitative disorders such as parosmia or phantosmia is still limited. This article gives an update on the current clinical knowledge and workup of parosmia and phantosmia.

Depuis la pandémie de Covid-19, la population est davantage informée sur les troubles de l'odorat. Ils peuvent être d'origines multiples. Comme pour toute modalité sensorielle, il existe des atteintes quantitatives et qualitatives. Les troubles quantitatifs sont mieux connus et pris en charge mais les troubles qualitatifs restent méconnus. Cet article traite des troubles de l'odorat qualitatifs, notamment de la parosmie et de la fantosmie, ainsi que de leur prise en charge.

How to Manage Taste Disorders.

Purpose of the Review: This study aims to summarize the current state of the art of how taste disorders are clinically best managed. Recent Findings: Taste disorders are distressing for the concerned patients since eating and drinking become bothersome or impossible. Apart from nutritional problems, quality of life is impaired. Still, diagnosis and treatment of taste disorders are elusive, and general knowledge about taste and its affection is little within the population and the medical community. This review stresses the importance of accurate workup and diagnosis of taste disorders in order to offer an effective treatment. Yet unclear aspects of taste disorders are discussed, and interesting findings regarding the treatment of taste disorders are reviewed. A special focus is given to current pharmacological options on how to treat taste disorders. Summary: Despite impressive insights into the gustatory function and molecular logic of taste receptor cells, there is currently poor clinical knowledge on the pathophysiology of taste disorders in humans. Diagnosing, measuring, and treating gustatory disorders remain restricted to a handful of specialized smell and taste centers worldwide. Despite interesting work on potential drugs treating taste disorders, many of the reported medications lack controlled and randomized trials confirming their efficacy in taste dysfunction. Future efforts need to be focused on the treatment of taste disorders.

Mechanically evoked tinnitus after cochlear implantation with preservation of residual hearing.

In the recent past, inclusion criteria for cochlear implant surgery expanded to patients with ever more residual acoustic hearing in the low frequencies. By applying the meticulous hearing preservation surgical strategy and specifically designed atraumatic electrode arrays, residual hearing can be preserved to a meaningful extent in a large majority of patients. In this paper, we describe two female patients suffering from mechanically evoked tinnitus after hearing preservation cochlear implantation surgery with MEDEL flex electrodes. The occurrence of audible perceptions through mechanical stimulation in the region of the external ear is believed to be due to the direct transmission of movements via the electrode array to the basilar membrane of the inner ear. In both cases, the mechanically evoked tinnitus led to revision surgery with immobilization of the array in the mastoid cavity. Despite eliminating the tinnitus, the revision surgery led to a loss of residual hearing in one patient, whereas the relatively poor residual hearing in the other revision case remained unchanged. The presence of mechanically evoked tinnitus seems to be associated with increased fragility of inner ear structures and hearing function, possibly due to direct mechanical contact of the electrode array with the basilar membrane. Consequently, the electrode array needs to be carefully immobilized in the mastoid cavity at a distance from soft tissue to prevent mechanical damage of inner ear structures, particularly in female patients with fine muscular tissue.

[Treatment of single-sided deafness by cochlear implantation]. / Traitement de la surdité unilatérale par l'implant cochléaire.

Single sided deafness diminishes speech understanding in noise and sound localization and thereby globally auditory performance. Most patients also suffer from tinnitus and indicate reduced quality of life. Patients have the choice to adapt to the new situation without treatment, to restore pseudostereophonic hearing by contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aids or to restore binaural hearing using a cochlear implant in the deaf ear. This article summarizes the physiological base of binaural hearing and treatment options for single sided deafness with a special emphasis on the cochlear implant.

La surdité unilatérale diminue la compréhension dans le bruit et la capacité de localiser les sources sonores affectant ainsi globalement la performance auditive. De plus, la qualité de vie est souvent impactée par la présence d'un acouphène dérangeant. Les patients ont le choix de s'adapter à la situation sans traitement ou de reconstituer une pseudo-stéréophonie à l'aide d'un appareillage qui transmet l'information auditive arrivant sur l'oreille sourde à l'oreille saine (Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)). L'implant cochléaire est une alternative récente qui permet de « réactiver ¼ l'oreille atteinte et de redonner ainsi une audition binaurale. Les différentes options de réhabilitation auditive en cas de surdité unilatérale en mettant l'accent sur l'implant cochléaire sont discutées à l'aide d'un cas clinique.

Olfactory Fluctuation Revisited.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients complain about olfactory fluctuation (OF), which is a symptom commonly attributed to sinonasal disease. Data-based evidence for its association with sinonasal disease is scarce. The aim of the study is to identify explanatory variables associated with OF and to analyze its predictive value regarding sinonasal disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study based on patients with olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed data from 482 patients attending the smell and taste outpatient clinic with full psychophysical workup and structured questions regarding their symptoms. The questionnaire included items on OF and chronic nasal symptoms. Clinical investigators filled out the second part of this questionnaire that included information about nasal endoscopy, psychophysical tests of orthonasal olfaction (Sniffin' Sticks), retronasal olfaction, and putative etiology of olfactory dysfunction. RESULTS: OF was more prevalent in sinonasal disease (42.4%) compared to other putative etiologies of olfactory dysfunction such as postinfectious (28%) or posttraumatic (11.7%) (X2 [5, n = 440] = 24.98; P < .0001). OF was strongly associated with Sniffin' Sticks score categories (anosmia, hyposmia, normosmia) (X2 [2, n = 424] = 39.21; P < .0001; Cramer's V = 0.30; P < .0001) and presence of "chronic nasal symptoms" (X2 [1, n = 437] = 22.71; P < .0001; Cramer's V = 0.23; P < .0001). The accuracy in predicting putative sinonasal disease etiology when OF was present depended strongly on the clinical context. CONCLUSION: Olfactory fluctuation is a symptom mostly but not exclusively associated with sinonasal disease, elevated Sniffin' Sticks test scores, and is frequently accompanied by other nasal complaints. Its presence is valuable information for clinicians to be integrated into the clinical context when doing patients' workup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2442-2447, 2020.