RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study reviews our use of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy over the last decade to track the trends in their usage in a middle-income country. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with intraoperative confirmed acute appendicitis from January 2013 to December 2019 at Grey's Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-one cases of AA were included. 724 (85%) patients underwent open surgery; 435 (60%) via a midline incision and 194 (27%) via a local incision. 127 (15%) patients underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy. A significant rend was noted for an increasing proportion of surgery performed by laparoscopy compared to open surgery (p = 0.02). Patients who underwent open surgery compared to laparoscopy presented with greater peritonism (48.5% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), delay from symptom onset (3 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001), more frequently from rural areas (94% vs. 86%, p = 0.002) and with higher AAST scores (46.7% AAST ≥ 4, vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001). This former group had significantly greater morbidity (42% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) with higher Clavien-Dindo scores, were more likely to require ICU admission (8.3% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001) and have longer hospital stay (4 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001); no statistically significant difference in mortality was observed (1.1% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a steady increase in the uptake of laparoscopic appendicectomy and decrease in open approaches in our centre. There is still a high rate of patients with advanced disease, and it is unlikely that this cohort will be suitable for laparoscopic surgery. If we hope to increase the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis even further, we must focus on identifying patients with early and low-grade disease.
