RESUMO
Background Accurate interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is one of the most crucial functions of the microbiology laboratory. However, its performance depends on a number of critical factors. We conducted a status survey to understand the existing practices in Indian laboratories that have a potential to influence performance of AST. Method We developed a 22-point online survey questionnaire on information about respondent's specifications, use of AST consumables, existing quality control protocols, and matters of contention in AST practices, and sent it by Google forms to 362 clinical microbiologists (holding MD or DNB certification). Participation was voluntary. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Among 362, a total of 103 returned the questionnaire. The first 100 responses that were complete (all 22 questions answered) were analyzed. Respondents were from medical colleges (61%), private hospitals (26%), and stand-alone laboratories (13%). Analysis revealed that the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were followed by all. Overall, 54% used disc diffusion as the primary method for performing AST. For the internal quality control testing of media and AST, 24% and 16% had adequate testing components and frequency, respectively. For performing AST of colistin, broth microdilution was used by 19%. Also, 86% participated in external quality control programs, and 54% respondents were dissatisfied or unsure about the development of competencies in AST methodology during their postgraduate training. Conclusion This survey reveals that potential gaps exist in the performance parameters and internal quality control of AST. There is an urgent need for harmonization in AST performance and postgraduate training in clinical microbiology in India.
RESUMO
Background: There was evidence that antibiotic usage increased in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the early days of the pandemic. Objective: We assessed the impact of stewardship interventions on antibiotic usage in these patients. Methods: We designed a quasi-experimental study using an interrupted time series. Patients were stratified according to the severity category of the illness - mild and moderate-to-severe (O2 saturation ≥94% and <93% respectively). Baseline antibiotic usage data was collected in the pre-intervention phase. Intervention was given in the form of focus group discussion (FGD) and followed up with feedback-audit during the post-intervention phase. Primary outcome was the change in days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Results: 361 adult patients were recruited in both phases during July to December, 2020. In the post-intervention phase, DOT per 1000 patient-days reduced from 589 to 523 (P=0.013) and from 843 to 585 (P <0.0001) in mild and moderate-to-severe categories, respectively. De-escalations at 48 hours increased significantly from 21% to 41% (P=0.0079) and from 31% to 62% (P=0.0006), respectively. No difference in mortality was observed. Conclusion: We found high usage of empirical antibiotics in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. FGD and feedback audits can successfully reduce antibiotic overuse in these patients.
