Women and vaccinations: From smallpox to the future, a tribute to a partnership benefiting humanity for over 200 years.

Vaccines were first developed in England over 200 years ago and have made a significant positive impact on human society since. Not often realized is the intimate relationship shared between vaccines and women. Women were key to the initial development of vaccines; some were even advocating the concept of protection against infectious disease through prior asymptomatic infection (by variolation) before the publication of the report of the first successful smallpox vaccination in 1798. Since that milestone, women have been important partners in the development of vaccines and advocates for their widespread introduction. Modern vaccine development would not be possible without the altruistic informed consent granted by many women for the participation of themselves or their children in vaccine clinical trials all over the world. Vaccines have rewarded women handsomely in return. Individual women benefit in many ways ranging from safer pregnancies to preventing cancers to attractive, unblemished skin. Some vaccines are even specifically designed to prevent diseases primarily affecting women such as cervical cancer. Vaccines also have offered societal benefits to women. These include better maternal health and fostering an environment more amenable to effective family planning. With these advances, women become more empowered and have access to better economic opportunities. The challenge of meeting the millennium development goals specifically targeted for women will be facilitated by vaccines. A better realization by women of the benefits of this partnership secured over the past 200 years will enable them to reap fully the rewards of the future.

Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of human rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) in Indian infants.

AIM: This study was undertaken to assess the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of two doses of an oral live-attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, strain RIX4414 (Rotarix()) in an Indian setting. RESULTS: The seroconversion rate observed one month post-dose 2 in the RIX4414 group 58.3% [95% CI: 48.7; 67.4] was significantly higher when compared to the placebo group 6.3%; [95% CI: 2.5; 12.5]. The reactogenicity and safety profile was similar for both groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy infants (N = 363), approximately eight weeks of age were enrolled to receive two doses of RIX4414 vaccine (n = 182) or placebo (n = 181) separated by one month. To assess the immune response, blood samples were taken before vaccination and one month post-dose 2 of RIX4414/placebo. Solicited symptoms were collected for eight-days post each dose and safety data was collected throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of RIX4414 (Rotarix()) were immunogenic, had a good safety profile and were well-tolerated when administered to healthy Indian infants. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00289172; eTrack 103792.

Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in a placebo-controlled rotavirus vaccine study.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, acellular pertussis combination vaccines have facilitated compliance with and coverage of the national immunisation programme in Singapore. This phase-II study (Rota-007) evaluated the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of a DTPa-IPV/Hib combined vaccine when co-administered with a rotavirus vaccine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2464 children aged 3 months were vaccinated with DTPa-IPV/Hib together with a randomised 1:3 ratio of either placebo (n=653) or 1 of 3 different formulations of a rotavirus vaccine. Blood samples were collected for immunogenicity analysis 1 month after the third DTPa-IPV/Hib vaccine dose in a subset of subjects (n = 640). Local and general reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events were recorded during the follow-up after each vaccination. RESULTS: Serological analysis showed >95% response for all antigens in the co-administered DTPa-IPV/Hib vaccine, with no difference between the rotavirus vaccine and placebo groups. No differences in adverse events and reactogenicity were reported in the rotavirus vaccine and placebo groups. Only 0.2% of the subjects reported Grade 3 adverse events. Three subjects (from the vaccine groups) died during the study, which were assessed by the investigators as unrelated to vaccination. No deaths were reported in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: The combined DTPa- IPV/Hib vaccine is safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic when given alone or coadministered with the rotavirus vaccine for infants in Singapore.