Technical performance: relation between surgical dexterity and technical knowledge.

Technical performance consists of surgical knowledge, judgment, and dexterity. Although assessment of surgical dexterity is now possible, assessing technical knowledge and its relation to dexterity has not been elucidated. Surgeons of varying experience were recruited to the skills laboratory to undertake three assessments: simple surgical dexterity (at 14 stations scored by motion analysis), an operating room equipment examination, and a novel error analysis. The scores were correlated, and p < 0.05 was deemed to be significant. Thirty surgeons were recruited; and construct validity was exhibited in all areas. Correlations were shown to exist between the two knowledge examinations (Spearman's rho = 0.39). Correlations existed between all dexterity task parameters and the equipment examination, whereas they existed for only 15 of the 28 parameters of the error examination and were always weaker. The stronger correlations between dexterity and instrument and operating room (OR) equipment reflect greater surgical experience and time spent in the OR. The weaker correlations between the error analysis and dexterity suggest that these skills are learned at different times. The identification of common surgical errors should be more formally taught to ensure greater uniformity.

Laboratory-based validation of a novel suture technique for wound closure.

Wound closure in open surgery is a fundamental skill acquired early during the surgeon's career. Individual modifications are adopted frequently by the more experienced surgeon in an effort to increase efficiency. To date, there has been no objective measurement regarding whether these modifications significantly impact economy of movement or procedure time. The advent of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) allows standardized, objective evaluation of a novel suture technique for wound closure (study group) developed by one of the senior authors (DBH) and compares the technique to the current method taught by the Royal College of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (control group). Ten surgical registrars underwent both tasks in a standardized manner for five repetitions. Mean total movements and duration of procedure were decreased significantly for the study group (analysis of variance: = 0.018 and = 0.033 respectively) with an economy index (total movements/total time) of 0.79 movements per second for the control group vs. 0.67 for the study group. This study demonstrates ICSAD's usefulness in defining a novel suture technique as a more efficient method of cutaneous closure than the currently advocated technique.