African-American inflammatory bowel disease in a Southern U.S. health center.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) remain significant health problems in the US and worldwide. IBD is most often associated with eastern European ancestry, and is less frequently reported in other populations of African origin e.g. African Americans ('AAs'). Whether AAs represent an important population with IBD in the US remains unclear since few studies have investigated IBD in communities with a majority representation of AA patients. The Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport (LSUHSC-S) is a tertiary care medical center, with a patient base composed of 58% AA and 39% Caucasian (W), ideal for evaluating racial (AA vs. W) as well and gender (M vs. F) influences on IBD. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 951 visits to LSUHSC-S for IBD (between 2000 to 2008) using non-identified patient information based on ICD-9 medical record coding (Crohn's disease 'CD'-555.0- 555.9 and ulcerative colitis 'UC'-556.0-556.9). RESULTS: Overall, there were more cases of CD seen than UC. UC and CD affected similar ratios of AA and Caucasian males (M) and females (F) with a rank order of WF > WM > AAF > AAM. Interestingly, in CD, we found that annual visits per person was the highest in AA M (10.7 ± 1.7); significantly higher (* -p < 0.05) than in WM (6.3 ± 1.0). Further, in CD, the female to male (F: M) ratio in AA was significantly higher (*- p < 0.05) (1.9 ± 0.2) than in Caucasians (F:M = 1.3 ± 0.1) suggesting a female dominance in AACD; no differences were seen in UC F: M ratios. CONCLUSION: Although Caucasians still represent the greatest fraction of IBD (~64%), AAs with IBD made up >1/3 (36.4%) of annual IBD cases from 2000-2008 at LSUHSC-S. Further studies on genetic and environments risks for IBD risk in AAs are needed to understand differences in presentation and progression in AAs and other 'non-traditional' populations.

ED visits by older adults for ambulatory care-sensitive and supply-sensitive conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of advanced age on ED outcomes, including hospitalization for any reason, ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations (ACSHs), and supply-sensitive hospitalizations. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey was conducted. National estimates of patient visits were obtained using available sampling weights from National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey, and population estimates were calculated using estimates published by the US Census Bureau. RESULTS: Older adults made 48 million patient visits to ED between 2000 and 2002. Overall, 20.3% was for an ambulatory care-sensitive condition, yielding 5 million ACSH, whereas 62% was for a supply-sensitive condition, yielding 9.5 million supply-sensitive hospitalizations. Residents from nursing homes and patients aged 85 years or older were more likely to be hospitalized for any reason, for ACSH, and for supply-sensitive conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to understand how comorbidity contributes to increasing ED and hospital use among older adults.

The effect of direct-to-consumer advertising on prescription drug use by older adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although older adults are frequent consumers of prescription drugs and increasingly the intended audience of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) marketing efforts, little is known about the effect of DTCA on older adults' prescription drug-seeking behaviour. In response, the objective of this study is to examine factors associated with requesting a prescription drug from a physician following exposure to DTCA among older adults, and whether the drug or other medical treatment was prescribed during the encounter. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of the "Public Health Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs", a data set publicly available through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR 3687), was conducted. For the purposes of this study, only those respondents who indicated that they had been exposed to DTCA (n = 2601) were included in the study sample. Using a two-step weighted logistic regression approach, separate models were estimated to examine first, whether a request for the advertised drug was made following exposure to DTCA and secondly, the outcomes of any patient-physician encounters that occurred following exposure to DTCA. RESULTS: Descriptive analysis of the outcome variables revealed that, among respondents exposed to DTCA, 31% (n = 801) requested a prescription drug from their physician. Approximately 5% of those who made a request were > or =75 years of age. Among respondents requesting a prescription drug, 69% (n = 556) received a prescription in response to their request, of whom, approximately 5% were > or =75 years of age. Multivariate findings suggest that although adults > or =75 years of age are less likely to request a prescription drug following exposure to DTCA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; p = 0.032), when they do approach their physicians, they are more likely to receive recommendations for further treatment, with ORs indicating a 250% (OR = 3.507; p = 0.002) increase in the odds of further referral among adults > or =75 years of age. CONCLUSION: Overall, results from the study suggest that DTCA influences the patient-doctor relationship and prescription drug acquisition behaviour of patients; however, the nature of the effect of DTCA on older adults is complex. Because future cohorts of older adults may be more comfortable about requesting prescription drugs and the consumer-driven approach to obtaining medical care, understanding the impact of DTCA on older consumers represents an important area for further inquiry.