Do Hospitals Achieving "Leader in LGBTQ Healthcare Equality" Maintain Higher Patient Scores Compared To Nonleaders?

ABSTRACT: The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) population deals with complex medical and behavioral issues coupled with barriers in accessing both healthcare and health insurance leading to poorer health outcomes as compared with the general population. Because this community is often overlooked in efforts to improve minority health disparities, in 2007, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation introduced the Healthcare Equality Index (HEI) for evaluating healthcare facilities' policies and practices related to the equity and inclusion of their LGBTQ patients, visitors, and employees. This study's aim was to determine whether the LGBTQ Healthcare Equality Leader institution designation advantage found by DiLeo et al (2020) has a continuing positive effect on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) performance. We found that patient scores for both Overall Rating and Willingness to Recommend were higher with noted improvement for HEI Leader institutions as compared with non-HEI Leader institutions over this study's 3-year period. Based on the findings of this study, it can be implied that hospitals do receive a return on their investment for achieving or maintaining the HEI Leader designation and this investment benefits all populations served by the organization inferred by their maintained higher patient experience scores.

The Relationship Between "Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality" Designation and Hospitals' Patient Experience Scores.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An increasing number of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals openly acknowledge their identity; however, the fear of discrimination prevents many from seeking healthcare-an issue challenged by a lack of culturally competent LGBT healthcare providers. With more than 4% of American adults identifying as LGBT individuals, greater attention to their needs is imperative to improve care and access for this population. This study examined organizational and market factors associated with hospitals achieving the "Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality" (Healthcare Equality Index, HEI; HEI Leader) designation and reported patient experience scores. We found that system-affiliated hospitals have 4.16 greater odds and teaching hospitals have 2.86 greater odds of earning the HEI Leader designation compared to nonsystem and nonteaching hospitals, respectively. Governmental hospitals have 2.47 greater odds of achieving HEI Leader status, while for-profit hospitals have 86% lower odds of having HEI Leader status compared to not-for-profit hospitals. Hospitals located in a metropolitan area have 3.19 greater odds of being an HEI Leader. The percentage of minorities and per capita income in a county also demonstrated a positive association with being an HEI Leader, with odds ratios of 1.00 and 1.02, respectively, while lower education was associated with 4% lower odds of being an HEI Leader. The main finding of this study was that HEI Leader-designated hospitals reported significantly higher overall hospital rating patient experience scores (B = 1.785; p ≤ .001) as compared to non-HEI Leader hospitals. As such, participation in the HEI may be viewed as a motivation for hospitals attaining HEI Leader designation.

A Critical Review of Health, Social, and Prevention Outcomes Associated With Employment for People Living With HIV.

A growing need has emerged among HIV service providers, policymakers, and researchers to understand ways in which employment, as a key social determinant of health, can be leveraged toward improved health outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and the prevention of HIV transmission. This critical review summarizes and assesses current research related to (a) the employment needs and challenges among populations disproportionately impacted by HIV, (b) the relationship between employment and important health outcomes associated with the HIV Care Continuum, and (c) implications for policy, service provision, and future research. As a first step to deepening an understanding of these issues, this analysis identifies gaps in knowledge to underscore the need and direction for future research so that well-targeted interventions can be designed and evaluated and more responsive policies can be developed to address the public health implications of the vocational development and employment needs of PLHIV.

The unmet vocational rehabilitation needs of women with HIV/AIDS.

This article discusses the growing population of women with HIV/AIDS as an emergent disability group with unique needs for vocational rehabilitation services. Data from the National Working Positive Coalition Employment Needs Survey for people living with HIV/AIDS was used to describe the demographic, economic, health, and employment characteristics of a sample of 122 female respondents. Findings make several contributions to understanding this emerging population and their vocational development needs including limited knowledge of employment resources, incentives and barriers to employment, and unmet needs for vocational rehabilitation services. Implications for vocational rehabilitation professionals and future research are discussed.