The impact of early CD4+ lymphocyte recovery on the outcome of patients who undergo allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Different factors influence the clinical outcome of allogeneic transplants, the foremost being good immune recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different factors, such as stem cell source, type of donor, conditioning regimen and acute graft-versus-host disease, on early lymphocyte recovery after transplantation. We then analyzed the impact of early CD4+ cell count on overall survival, transplant-related mortality and disease-related mortality. RESULTS: Univariate analysis with Spearman's rho showed a significant correlation between early CD4+ cell recovery and overall survival, transplant-related mortality, stem cell source and type of donor. In multivariate analysis CD4+ cell count was significantly associated with (i) stem cell source, being higher in patients whose haematopoietic progenitor cells were obtained by apheresis than in those whose source of grafted cells was bone marrow, and (ii) type of donor, being higher in patients transplanted from sibling donors than in those whose graft was from an alternative donor. The ROC curve of CD4+ cell count indicated that a cut-off of 115 CD4+ cells/mL could differentiate groups with different outcomes. At 2 years follow-up, patients achieving this CD4+ cell count had significantly lower cumulative transplant-related mortality compared to patients who did not have this count (10%±4% versus 40%±8%, p=0.0026). At the 5-year follow-up, the overall survival rates were 77.5%±0.6% and 36%±7% (p=0.000) in patients with a CD4+ cell count ≥115/mL and in patients with CD4+ cell count ≤ 115/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early CD4+ cell recovery after allogeneic transplantation has a relevant impact on overall survival and transplant-related mortality and is influenced by two factors: stem cell source and type of donor.

Predictive factors that affect the mobilization of CD34(+) cells in healthy donors treated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

No specific characteristics have been identified as predictors of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization in healthy donors. In this study, clinical characteristics and laboratory data for 122 healthy donors who underwent apheresis on day 5 of treatment with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were retrospectively analyzed for correlations with CD34(+) cell mobilization. The variables that were analyzed included age, sex, body weight, basal complete blood count, and maximum white blood count (WBC) before apheresis, G-CSF type, and dosage. Median age and body weight were 42.5 years (range 16-65) and 72.5 kg (range 47-121), respectively. By univariate analysis, male sex (P = 0.007), body weight (< or = 70 vs. >70 kg, P = 0.04), and donor's age (< or = 50 vs. > 50 years; P = 0.015) were correlated with the number of CD34(+) cells mobilized. By multivariate analysis, donor's age and male sex were the only two variables that significantly predicted a high CD34(+) cell level. In conclusion, our data suggest that male sex and younger age are the only factors that significantly affect CD34(+) mobilization in healthy donors.

Harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors: retrospective comparison of filgrastim and lenograstim.

Mobilization of CD34+ into peripheral blood is attained by either glycosylated (lenograstim) or non-glycosylated recombinant G-CSF (filgrastim). 101 donors, 57 males, median age 42 years (range 16-63) entered this retrospective study. Group I (55 cases) received filgrastim and group II lenograstim subcutaneously for 5-6 days. The peak number of CD34+ cells/microl blood observed on day 4 and 5 was not significantly different in the two groups. No differences were shown in terms of both circulating CFU-GM at the time of harvesting and CD34+ target of collection. The most frequent side effects were bone pain (18.2% grade I; 36.4% grade II, 7.3% grade III), headache (18.2%), nausea (9.1%), fever (5.5%) and a mild splenomegaly (> 2 cm) (5.5%) in filgrastim group, and bone pain (37.0% grade I, 26.1% grade II, 2.2% grade III), headache (17.4%), nausea (15.2%), fever (4.4%) and a mild splenomegaly (4.3%) in lenograstim group, respectively. CD34+ collection was associated with thrombocytopenia, which was not significantly different between the two groups. No donor in either group developed long-term adverse effects. We conclude that both G-CSFs are comparable in terms of CD34+ cell collection, safety and tolerability.

High-dose chemotherapy with mitoxantrone + melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in metastatic breast cancer patients: a study of feasibility and tolerability.

Hematological and extra-hematological toxicity of mitoxantrone-containing regimens with autologous stem cell rescue was evaluated in 32 metastatic breast cancer patients. The schedule was the final part of two high-dose chemotherapy programs, including an induction phase with three courses of conventional chemotherapy with epirubicin (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus three courses of docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and a first high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) or melphalan (160 mg/m2) plus thiotepa (600 mg/m2). The final second autograft phase included mitoxantrone (60 mg/m2) associated with melphalan (160 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell rescue infusion. The median duration of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 9 (range, 7-13) and 11.5 (range, 9-29) days. The median number of units of erythrocytes and platelets transfused was 1 (0-11) and 4 (1-9), respectively. Fever for a median of 2 (0-8) days developed in 71.8% of the patients. Mucositis was observed in 81.2% (WHO grade 3-4 in 25%). No acute or late cardiac toxicity was observed. One patient died because of a transplant-unrelated cause. The response according to the program phase showed an increased rate of complete response, from 12.5% at the end of conventional chemotherapy to 21.9% after the first high-dose chemotherapy course, to increase to 43.9% after the treatment with mitoxantrone-melphalan. We conclude that a conditioning regimen with high dose mitoxantrone-melphalan fits well within the high-dose chemotherapy program.