The Cost of Foodborne Illness and Its Sequelae in Australia Circa 2019.

Foodborne illnesses cause a significant health burden, with Campylobacter and norovirus the most common causes of illness and Salmonella a common cause of hospitalization and occasional cause of death. Estimating the cost of illness can assist in quantifying this health burden, with pathogen-specific costs informing prioritization of interventions. We used a simulation-based approach to cost foodborne disease in Australia, capturing the cost of premature mortality, direct costs of nonfatal illness (including health care costs, medications, and tests), indirect costs of illness due to lost productivity, and costs associated with pain and suffering. In Australia circa 2019, the cost in Australian Dollars (AUD) of foodborne illness and its sequelae was 2.44 billion (90% uncertainty interval 1.65-3.68) each year, with the highest pathogen-specific costs for Campylobacter, non-typhoidal Salmonella, non-Shiga toxin-producing pathogenic Escherichia coli, and norovirus. The highest cost per case was for Listeria monocytogenes (AUD 776,000). Lost productivity was the largest component cost for foodborne illness due to all causes and for most individual pathogens; the exceptions were pathogens causing more severe illness such as Salmonella and L. monocytogenes, where premature mortality was the largest component cost. Foodborne illness results in a substantial cost to Australia; interventions to improve food safety across industry, retail, and consumers are needed to maintain public health safety.

Levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) in fillets of farmed Southern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus maccoyii).

Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) (Thunnus maccoyii) is the only farmed tuna species in the southern hemisphere, with production centred offshore of Port Lincoln, South Australia. SBT farming is a quota-based fishery where farmers fatten wild-caught stock for subsequent sale as fresh-chilled or frozen product, mainly to Japanese markets. Fillets from wild-caught and farmed SBT were analysed and the concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) are reported for the first time. Time of farming was separated into two periods: a typical farming period of approximately five months and an experimental scenario that involved holding (farming) these fish for an additional 12 months. WHO-PCB and WHO-PCDD/F TEQ concentrations in fillets on a fresh weight basis at the same times and over the same periods were, 0.67-1.18pg-TEQg(-1) and 0.16-0.29pg-TEQg(-1), respectively. All WHO-PCB congeners, and only three WHO-PCDD/F congeners, were found to biomagnify during farming, after blank correction. Caution should be exercised when extrapolating these results to SBT farming as a whole because of the use of varying husbandry and feeding practices employed by different companies.

Dioxins, PCBs, metals, metalloids, pesticides and antimicrobial residues in wild and farmed Australian southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii).

Data concerning the concentration of dioxins (PCDD/PCDFs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals, metalloids, pesticides and antimicrobials residues are reported for the edible portion of Australian wild and farmed southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii). In 2004 wild caught (n=5) and farmed (n=26) southern bluefin tuna (SBT) were collected. The mean concentration of total mercury on a fresh weight (fw) basis was 0.34 mg/kg in wild SBT and 0.31 mg/kg in farmed SBT. Concentrations of dioxins (PCDD/PCDFs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) found in wild SBT were extremely low. The mean concentration (fw) of the sum of PCDD/PCDFs and the dioxin-like PCBs was 0.27 pg TEQ/g in wild SBT and 0.61 pg TEQ/g in farmed SBT. Mean PCB total concentration (fw basis) was 0.47 ng/g in wild SBT and 6.60 ng/g in farmed SBT. No detectable residues of any pesticide or antimicrobial compounds were found. All residues detected were within regulatory limits set by the Japanese Competent Authority, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and the Australian Competent Authority, Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). The need for harmonisation of international product integrity procedures for bluefin tunas in international trade is highlighted.