[Older patients and injectable anticancer drug: Feasibility study of the implementation of pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics in a hospital center]. / Patients âgés et anticancéreux injectables : étude de faisabilité de la mise en place d'entretiens pharmaceutiques d'oncogériatrie dans un centre hospitalier.

INTRODUCTION: In our establishment, pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics have been developed to reduce drug iatrogenesis. The target patients were older patients (≥65years) with polypharmacy and/or identified at risk of frailty (G8≤14), starting an injectable cancer protocol. METHODS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics over a period of six months. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients benefited from a pharmaceutical interview in oncogeriatrics (median age 76 years; 21 patients with G8≤14). Two-thirds of the patients met other interveners during patient care, 4 of whom after referral by the pharmacist. As for medication reviews: 93% of patients required pharmaceutical intervention (average of 3.5 per patient). The majority proposed therapeutic follow-ups and discontinuations of treatment. According to their evaluation by a pharmacist/oncologist pair, 97% of pharmaceutical interventions would have a positive clinical impact, of which 13 % a major clinical impact. The main drug classes concerned by the pharmaceutical interventions were analgesics, drugs used in diabetes and psycholeptics. Among the four pharmaceutical interventions with major clinical impact, nine proposed the optimization of analgesic treatment. DISCUSSION: The implementation of these interviews allowed us to initiate the creation of a care pathway dedicated to older patients identified as fragile. The pharmaceutical care offered appear to provide added value in the care of these patients. Organizational changes are necessary to promote multidisciplinarity and improve our practices in oncogeriatrics.

[Oral anticancer drug: Feedback from six years of tripartite consultations in a hospital center]. / Anticancéreux oraux : retour d'expérience après six années de consultations tripartites dans un centre hospitalier.

INTRODUCTION: Tripartite consultations with a coordination between hospital and community care givers were implemented within hospital center for patients who start an oral anticancer regimen. METHODS: Six years after the implementation, we wanted to assess this patient's pathway and describe how adjustments were necessary over the time. RESULTS: A total of 961 patients received tripartite consultations. The medication review process revealed that nearly half of patients had polypharmacy (≥5 drugs/day). A pharmaceutical intervention was formulated in 45 % of cases and they were all accepted. For 33 % of patients, a drug interaction was identified and required for 21 % of them, discontinuation of one drug of their personal treatment. Coordination with general practitioner and community pharmacists were achieved for all patients. 390 patients benefitted from nursing telephone follow-up which represents approximately 20 calls per day to assess tolerance and compliance with treatments. Over time, organisational adjustments were necessary to adapt to the increase in activity. The scheduling of consultations has been improved thanks to the creation of a shared agenda and consultation reports have been expanded. Finally, an hospital functional unit was created to facilitate the financial valuation of this activity. DISCUSSION: The feedback collected from the teams showed a real desire to perpetuate this activity even if it would seem that an improvement in human resources is still relevant as well as a better optimisation of the coordination between all the participants.

Severe rhabdomyolysis induced by possible drug-drug interaction between Ribociclib and Simvastatin.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-drug interactions with cyclin-dependent kinases inhibitors 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are known and should be taken into account. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old woman, on prior Simvastatin therapy, developed severe rhabdomyolysis after three weeks of Ribociclib initiation. She showed general weakness with mobility problems and was admitted to our hospital. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Ribociclib and Simvastatin were discontinued and the patient received intensive intravenous hydration. She finally recovered her mobility after two weeks. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that Simvastatin induced rhabdomyolysis by possible interaction with Ribociclib. Ribociclib is a strong inhibitor of CYP 3A4 and a potential inhibitor of OATP1B1 membrane transporter. Simvastatin plasma concentration may reach toxic levels due to Ribociclib inhibition. To assess the relevance of our hypothesis, we used the Drug Interaction Scale. With a total score of 7, the interaction is considered as "probable." Because of the high risk of severe rhabdomyolysis, the concomitant use of Simvastatin with Ribociclib should be avoided or otherwise careful monitoring of creatine kinase is warranted.

Cost savings of home bortezomib injection in patients with multiple myeloma treated by a combination care in Outpatient Hospital and Hospital care at Home.

At home injectable chemotherapy for patients receiving treatment for hematological diseases is still in debate. Given the expense of new innovative medicines, at home treatment has been proposed as a suitable option for improving patient quality of life and decreasing treatment costs. We decided to assess the cost of bortezomib administration in France among multiple myeloma patients from an economic standpoint. Patients in this study were treated within a regional hematological network combining outpatient hospital care and Hospital care at Home administration. To make the cost comparison, our team simulated outpatient hospital care expenses. Fifty-four consecutive multiple myeloma patients who received at least one injection of bortezomib in Hospital care at Home from January 2009 to December 2011 were included in the study. The median number of injections was 12 (range 1-44) at home and 6 (range 0-30) in the outpatient care unit. When compared with the cost simulation of outpatient hospital care alone, bortezomib administration with combined care was significantly less expensive for the National Health Insurance (NHI) budget. The mean total cost per patient and per injection was 954.20 € for combined outpatient and Hospital care at Home vs 1143.42 € for outpatient hospital care alone. This resulted in an estimated 16.5 % cost saving (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.0001). The greatest savings were observed in administration costs (37.5 % less) and transportation costs (68.1 % less). This study reflects results for a regionally implemented program for multiple myeloma patients treated with bortezomib in routine practice in a large rural area.