[Impact of animal-assisted therapy on well-being in patients with Alzheimer's disease (ELIAUT study)]. / Impact de la thérapie assistée par l'animal sur le bien être chez des patients présentant une maladie d'Alzheimer (étude ELIAUT).

The development of non-pharmacological interventions, including animal-assisted therapy (AAT), is an encouraging method for the care of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). A single-center, randomized, single-blind, controlled intervention study was proposed to compare immediate well-being measured by a visual analog scale (EVIBE) as primary outcome between the intervention group (AAT combined with cognitive stimulation) and the control group (cognitive stimulation only) in AD patients. Secondary outcomes were explored, such as well-being after intervention (also with the EVIBE), cognitive performance (measured by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive part GRECO version), behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Behavioral Scale-Nursing Home Version), current depressive symptomatology (with the 30 items Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS 30]) and anxiety (by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Forty-two patients were included, 22 in the intervention group and 20 in the control group. The mean age was 82.5 years and mean MMSE score 19.2 in the control group and 81.4 years and mean MMSE score 18.4 in the TAA group. The results show a significant effect of the intervention on well-being after four weeks (p = 0.048), but no significant effect on cognitive functioning, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. This study shows a small effect of TAA on well-being four weeks after the end of the intervention. The assessment of well-being by another measurement tool and the collection of observations made by the care team could be explored in future studies, which could require a larger sample and a longer follow-up.

Economic and caregiver impact of Alzheimer's disease across the disease spectrum: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) substantially increases health-related costs. This study investigates direct medical costs and characterizes the caregiver burden across AD stages. METHODS: This study analyzed data from the French Primary Health Insurance Fund claims database and reflected this public payer perspective. Outpatients (N = 1998) visiting a memory clinic at Lyon University Hospital in France between 2014 and 2019 were included. Real healthcare costs (ie, ambulatory medicine, paramedical care, pharmaceutical treatment, public and private hospital stays, and medical transportation) were collected for patients 1 year prior to the date of the first memory visit and 2 years following the first visit (reference year: 2019). Patients were grouped based on a clinical diagnosis of cognitively normal with a subjective cognitive complaint (SCC), all-cause mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or AD dementia. The severity of AD dementia was defined by the Mini-Mental State Examination score. Caregiver burden was measured using the mini Zarit Burden Interview. A generalized linear model was used for statistical analyses. Other patient nonmedical and indirect costs and caregiver costs were not included. RESULTS: The study sample included patients with SCC (n = 640), MCI (n = 630), mild (n = 212), moderate (n = 256), or moderately severe/severe AD dementia (n = 260). One year after the first consultation, mean total costs were higher with progressive cognitive deficit, with little difference between dementia groups (SCC = €8028; MCI = €9758; mild AD dementia = €10,558; moderate AD dementia = €10,544; moderately severe/severe AD dementia = €10,345; P < .001). Public hospital stays comprised the majority of direct medical costs during the first semester following the visit (49.4% of the total costs), regardless of the severity of cognitive deficit. Caregiver burden increased with the severity of cognitive deficit (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Direct medical costs and caregiver burden rose from SCC to AD dementia; in patients with AD dementia, the direct medical costs increased over the 2 years after the first consultation. These results, in conjunction with data from other care components, will be critical to elucidate the potential economic value of a therapeutic intervention that slows AD progression.

Exposure to Anticholinergic and Sedative Drugs and Healthcare Costs in Older Patients with Neurocognitive Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Literature supports an increasing number of older patients living with neurocognitive disorders alongside with their annual worldwide costs. Therapeutic management of behavioral and psychological symptoms includes the use of anticholinergic and sedative drugs for which significant exposure is negatively associated with clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the healthcare costs differences related to an increase in the exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs in older patients with neurocognitive disorder. METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted during 3 years on 1,604 participants of the MEMORA cohort linked with both regional public health insurance and hospital discharge databases between 2012 and 2017. Direct medical and non-medical costs were included. Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs was measured by the drug burden index (DBI). RESULTS: Costs difference associated with a DBI≥0.5 were + 338€ (p < 0.001). After adjustment on comorbidities, NCD stage, cognitive impairment, functional limitation, polypharmacy, and sociodemographic characteristics, a DBI≥0.5 was found to be an independent predictor of an increase of total healthcare costs by 22%(p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic and sedative drugs have a substantial economic burden among older patients with neurocognitive disorder. More studies are required to assess the clinical and economic impact of an efficient strategy based on the reduction of the exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs and the promotion of non-pharmacological interventions.

Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to propose a correction of the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) score to take into account the possibility to have never done some activities, and measured its agreement and reliability with the usual IADL score. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients attending French memory clinics between 2014 and 2017. Lawton IADL, cognitive performance, diagnosis, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics characteristics were collected. A corrected IADL was calculated and its agreement with the usual IADL was assessed. RESULTS: The study included of 2391 patients (79.9 years old, 61.7% female). Based on the usual IADL, 36.9% of patients had never carried out at least one of the activities. This proportion reached 68.8% for men and 17.7% for women. Women had a mean IADL higher than men: 4.72 vs 3.49, this difference decreased when considering the corrected IADL: 4.82 vs 4.26 respectively. Based on Bland-Altman method, 93.5% of observations lied within the limits agreement. The ICC between the 2 scores was 0.98. The relationships between patients' characteristics and the IADL scores were similar, regardless the usual or corrected version. CONCLUSIONS: This corrected IADL score had an excellent degree of agreement with the usual version based the ICC. This simple correction could benefit both for the clinical practice by providing a more accurate description of the real clinical state of the patients allowing to manage them more precisely, and for research involving the evaluation of the functional abilities of patients.

Subjective cognitive and non-cognitive complaints and brain MRI biomarkers in the MEMENTO cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Subjective cognitive complaints may be a signature of preclinical stage Alzheimer's disease. However, the link between subjective cognitive and non-cognitive complaints and brain alterations remains unclear. METHODS: The relationship between cognitive and non-cognitive complaints and brain biomarkers, measured by structural magnetic resonance imaging, was investigated in 2056 participants of the MEMENTO cohort of outpatients, who were dementia-free at baseline. We assessed whether the cognitive status at inclusion or the presence of the apolipoprotein E gene variant (APOE) ε4 could modulate the association between the intensity of complaints and brain lesions. RESULTS: Smaller hippocampal volume was associated with higher memory complaints and discomfort in daily life. In APOE ε4 carriers, smaller whole-brain white matter and gray matter volumes and gyrification indices in several regions of interest of the parietal and temporal lobes, in the entorhinal and the para-hippocampal gyrus, were associated with higher memory complaint score. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of subjective complaints in not only memory but discomfort in daily life was associated with brain degeneration markers. The presence of APOE ε4 modulated the relationships between subjective memory complaints and brain alterations.

What Could Be the Main Levers to Promote a Timely Diagnosis of Neurocognitive Disorders?

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive disorders (NCD) are a growing health issue and the importance of diagnosis is still debated despite the benefits of making a diagnosis appearing to be greater than the risks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to explore the perception of the main benefits and risks to perform a diagnosis workup of NCD in a population of general practitioners (GPs), specialized physicians (SPs), other healthcare professionals (OHPs), and informal caregivers (ICs), and to identify the lowest perceived benefits and the highest perceived risks that could be levers to promote a diagnosis of NCD. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was submitted to GPs, SPs, OHPs, and ICs aiming to evaluate the importance of eight benefits and eight risks related to NCD diagnosis (selected from the literature) for four prototypical clinical cases at different stages of the disease: subjective cognitive impairment/mild NCD, major NCD at mild/moderate stage, moderate stage with behavioral and psychotic symptoms, and severe stage. RESULTS: The lowest perceived benefits of making an NCD diagnosis were "access to medical research", "patient's right to know", and "initiation of symptomatic drug treatment". The highest perceived risks of making an NCD diagnosis were "negative psychological impact for the patient", "absence of disease-modifying treatment", and "absence of suitable institution". CONCLUSION: This study highlights the lowest perceived benefits and the highest perceived risks of making an NCD diagnosis. These benefits and risks could be modified to become levers to promote a personalized diagnosis of NCD.

Medication exposure and frailty in older community-dwelling patients: a cross-sectional study.

Objective To investigate the association between the medication exposure, measured by the polypharmacy/excessive polypharmacy and the anticholinergic and/or sedative drug exposure, on frailty status among French older community-dwelling patients. Setting day-care unit in France (Lyon), with retrospective data from July, 2017 to March, 2018. Method This monocentric cross-sectional study included community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and over and admitted at the day-care unit for a geriatric evaluation. Frailty was assessed according to the frailty phenotype, described by Fried et al. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and 10 or more drugs, respectively. The cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure was measured using the drug burden index (DBI). The DBI score was presented in 4 differentiated scores: a null score (DBI = 0), a combined score (anticholinergic and sedative score), an anticholinergic score, and a sedative score. The association between medication and frailty was assessed by logistic regression models controlled for multiple potential confounders. Main outcome measure Association between medication exposure (polypharmacy, anticholinergic and sedative exposure) and frailty. Results In this study, 403 patients were included: 44.7% were frail and 40.7% were pre-frail. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy affected 44.7% and 17.1% of the population respectively. The mean DBI was 0.33 ± 0.43, with 16.4% of patients with only sedative exposure, 9.7% with only anticholinergic exposure and 33.0% with both exposures. After adjustment, polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.18 (1.03-4.22) and 2.72 (1.01-7.37) respectively. The cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs (combined score) was significantly associated to an increased risk for frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.54 (1.47-8.57). Conclusion The study showed that polypharmacy and cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure are associated with frailty. Further research should address the potential benefit of collaborative medication review for preventing medication-associated frailty.

Comparison of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment by face-to-face or telephone interviews: a randomized, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: The functional autonomy assessment is essential to manage patients with a neurodegenerative disease, but its evaluation is not always possible during a consultation. To optimize ambulatory autonomy assessment, we compared the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire collected by telephone and face-to-face interviews. METHODS: A randomized, crossover study was carried out among patients attending a memory clinic (MC). The IADL questionnaire was collected for patients during telephone and face-to-face interviews between nurses and patients' caregivers. The agreement between the two methods was measured using the proportion of participants giving the same response, Cohen's kappa, intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient, and Bland and Altman method. The associations between patients' characteristics, events occurring between the two assessments, and agreement were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 292 patients (means ± SD age 81.5 ± 7, MMSE 19.6 ± 6, 39.7% with major neurocognitive disorders) analyzed, the proportion of agreement between the two modes was 89.4% for the total IADL score. Weighted kappa coefficient was 0.66 and ICC score was 0.91 for total IADL score. The mean difference between the IADL score by telephone or face-to-face was 0.32. Overall, 96.9% of measures lay within the 95% limits of agreement. The occurrence of fall was less likely associated with the probability to lie within the 95% limits of agreement (OR = 0.07 [0.02-0.27]). CONCLUSION: The administration of IADL by telephone with the caregiver appears to be an acceptable method of assessment for MC patients compared to face-to-face interview. The events such as falls which could occur in a time close to the evaluation should be reported. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654574. Retrospectively registered: 13 January 2016.

A multicenter cohort study to investigate the factors associated with functional autonomy change in patients with cognitive complaint or neurocognitive disorders: the MEMORA study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The identification of factors associated with functional impairment, in particular those which are potentially modifiable, may help to delay the advanced stages of functional dependence in patients with neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. The objectives of the MEMORA cohort are to investigate the factors associated, first with functional autonomy change over time, and secondarily with the cognitive performance and behavioral disorders changes over time. METHODS: The MEMORA study is a multicenter prospective cohort study carried out throughout the patient's care pathway, in Memory centers of Lyon (France). The study will include 6780 patients at all stages of memory disorders in 6 years. The follow-up for each patient is planned for 3 years. The main outcome is the functional autonomy level change as assessed by the instrumental abilities of daily living (IADL) score. Patient characteristics include sociodemographic and clinical features, neuropsychological performance, pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical therapy. DISCUSSION: This study conducted in a context of routine care may help to identify the factors associated with functional impairment related to progressive neurocognitive disorders. Subsequently, interventions on potentially modifiable factors could be proposed to the patients to improve their management and delay functional dependence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02302482 , registered 27 November 2014.

Impact of Cognitive, Functional, Behavioral Disorders, and Caregiver Burden on the Risk of Nursing Home Placement.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the attributable fraction of nursing home placement associated with cognitive impairment, neuropsychiatric symptoms, behavioral disorders, functional limitations, and caregiver burden. DESIGN: Longitudinal study conducted on the "MEMORA cohort" linked with both regional public health insurance and hospital discharge databases. SETTING: Memory center at the University Hospital of Lyon, France. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 2456 outpatients attending the memory center between 2012 and 2017. MEASURES: Cognitive impairment, functional limitations, neuropsychiatric symptoms/behavioral disorders, and caregiver burden were measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and a short version of the Zarit Burden Inventory, respectively. Sociodemographics characteristics were collected during the first visit. Comorbidities were gathered from the hospital discharge database. Dates of nursing home placement were obtained from the public health insurance database. RESULTS: More than 38% of nursing home placements were attributable to caregiver burden, and the attributable fraction associated with functional limitations exceeded 35%. Between 20% and 25% of nursing home placements were due to cognitive impairment whereas less than 16% were attributable to neuropsychiatric symptoms or behavioral disorders. The associations between anxiety or agitation and nursing home placement were mediated by caregiver burden. Apathy or aberrant motor behaviors were associated with a higher risk of nursing home placement independently of caregiver burden. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that a high proportion of nursing home placements are attributable to caregiver burden and functional limitations in outpatients attending a memory center. Cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms or behavioral disorders contribute less to nursing home placements. Interventions directed to delay nursing home placement should emphasize actions toward reducing caregiver burden and functional limitations of patients.

Perception of Benefits and Risks of Neurocognitive Disorders Diagnosis: A French National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive disorders (NCD) are underdiagnosed in primary care, mainly because of the misunderstanding of benefits associated with timely diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and risks of diagnosis in a population of general practitioners (GPs), specialized physicians (SPs), other healthcare professionals (HPs), and informal caregivers (ICs). METHODS: A questionnaire was submitted to GPs, SPs, HPs. and ICs. It aimed at evaluating benefits and risks related to NCD diagnosis associated with four prototypical clinical cases at different stages: isolated cognitive complaint/mild NCD, major NCD at mild/moderate stage, moderate stage with behavioral and psychotic symptoms, and severe stage. The concepts of early, timely, and personalized diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 719 completed surveys were collected from 183 GPs, 176 SPs, 281 HPs, and 79 ICs. More than 90% of the participants considered initiating a diagnosis as relevant except at the severe stage. Benefits were superior to risks for all groups and all four cases alike (p < 0.001). Benefits were lower according to GPs and higher for SPs than the other groups at the first two stages (p < 0.001). At the moderate stage, there were few differences between groups. At the severe stage, GPs and SPs claimed it was less relevant to carry out a diagnosis than the other groups (p < 0.001). Risks were higher for ICs and lower for SPs (p < 0.001). The best diagnosis concept was the personalized diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Benefits appeared more relevant than risks with differences according to the stage of the disease and type of respondents.

The Scale of instantaneous wellbeing: validity in a population with major neurocognitive disorders.

The quality of life (QoL) of people with a neurodegenerative pathology is a major issue in the absence of curative treatment. However, validated tools, suitable for patients with major neurocognitive disorders at a severe stage are rare and time-consuming in routine. The aim of this study is to analyze the validity of convergence and the reliability over time of a visual analog scale of well-being named EVIBE (Échelle d'évaluation instantanée de bien-être). The correlation between the EVIBE and another quality of life scale, the Qol-Ad was studied. The correlation with other scales expected to vary with QoL was also studied with the EQ-5D for the measurement of the state of health felt and the NPI-ES for the measurement of behavioral disorders. The EVIBE was administered twice, a few minutes apart, to measure its reliability over time. One hundred and thirty-five patients with Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder were recruited. The results indicated a significant correlation with Qol-AD (r=0.54, p< 0.001). The correlation remained significant when the Mini mental state examination was less than 10 (r=0.39, p=0.05). Correlations between EVIBE and EQ-5D and NPI-ES indicated more mixed results with significant correlation only for the analog part of the EQ-5D (r=0.34, p=0.007). The comparison between the two EVIBEs a few minutes apart showed a satisfactory agreement (r=0.52, p> 0.001). This study shows that EVIBE present a good convergence validity and a good reliability over time to measure the QoL of patients with neurodegenerative pathology even at severe stages of the disease. The scale allows a direct and rapid assessment of the QoL of patients in routine.

Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medicines as indicators of high-risk prescriptions in the elderly.

Background There are several assessment scales to evaluate the risk of falls or the adverse drug reaction risk. Few are sufficiently specific to assess the impact of drug prescriptions on falls in geriatric populations. Objective To define the risk of anticholinergic and sedation-related ADRs in an elderly hospitalized patient population using the Drug Burden Index (DBI), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), and Sedative Load Model (SLM). Setting Five geriatric university hospital centers in France. Method Multicenter prospective cohort study from 2011 to 2013. Drug prescriptions were compiled to estimate anticholinergic and sedative exposure. Any associations between the drug scales and falls were assessed. Main outcome measure Drug exposure estimated with the DBI, ADS, and SLM scales. Results 315 patients, with a mean age of 87 years and 117 documented falls, were included from 5 geriatric hospitals. Sixty-one percent of these patients had a DBI > 0, 20.3% had an ADS ≥ 3, 56.2% a SLM > 0. No association was detected between the scores and the risk of a fall (p > 0.05). Factors significantly associated with a risk of a fall were: a prior history of a fall in the previous 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.24, 4.06-12.89), orthostatic hypotension ([aOR] = 2.84; 1.39-5.79), or prescription of antidepressants ([aOR] = 2.12; 1.17-3.84). Conclusion A specific scale to identify high-risk prescriptions would help clinicians and pharmacists to optimize therapeutic treatments for the elderly. In light of the multifactorial characteristics of falls, predicting their risk should be based on a well-defined set of factors.

Can Musical or Painting Interventions Improve Chronic Pain, Mood, Quality of Life, and Cognition in Patients with Mild Alzheimer's Disease? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Among non-pharmacological therapies, musical intervention is often used for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and patients presenting chronic pain. However, their efficacy is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of choral singing versus painting sessions on chronic pain, mood, quality of life, and cognition in AD patients. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 59 mild AD patients were randomized to a 12-week singing (SG; n = 31) or painting group (PG; n = 28). Chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and quality of life were assessed before, after, and 1 month after the sessions. Cognitive abilities were assessed before and after interventions. The evolution of these different measures was assessed with mixed linear models. The primary data analysis was by intention-to-treat, and completed by a 'per protocol' approach. RESULTS: Both singing and painting interventions led to significant pain reduction (Time effect: F = 4.71; p = 0.01), reduced anxiety (Time effect: F = 10.74; p < 0.0001), improved Quality of Life (Time effect: F = 6.79; p = 0.002), improved digit span (F = 12.93; p = 0.001), and inhibitory processes (Time effect: F = 4.93; p = 0.03). Depression was reduced over time in PG only (Time x Group effect: F = 4.53; p = 0.01). Verbal Memory performance remained stable over time in SG, but decreased in PG (Time x group effect: F = 9.29; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that singing and painting interventions may reduce pain and improve mood, quality of life, and cognition in patients with mild AD, with differential effects of painting for depression and singing for memory performance.

A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of optimization of drug prescribing in an elderly population, at 18 months of follow-up, in the evolution of functional autonomy: the OPTIM study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is necessary for the management of many diseases which number increased with aging. However, potentially inappropriate prescriptions and polymedication increases iatrogenic risks and can lead to adverse events. To limit the consequences of potentially harmful prescriptions, optimization of drug prescribing is a major stake of improving quality and safety of care in the elderly. The purpose of the OPTIM study is to study the impact of the optimization of drug prescribing on the evolution of functional autonomy at 18 months of follow-up. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial was designed to assess the impact of an optimization program of drug prescribing consisting in a clinical medication review by a pharmacist, in collaboration with specialist physician of the geriatric/memory center and the referent physician, on the evolution of functional autonomy level, measured during 18 months of follow-up. The study will include 302 elderly outpatients visiting geriatric and memory centers, randomly distributed in one of the two parallel groups. One group will benefit of the intervention, while the other will be considered as control group. The effect of the intervention on evolution of the level of autonomy function, defined with repeated measures, will be estimated in a generalized linear mixed model. The intervention will be considered significant if the interaction between time and the study group is significant. Secondary analysis will be conducted to assess the impact of the intervention on secondary clinical outcomes. DISCUSSION: The "OPTIM" program should enable optimization of drug prescribing in elderly patients and therefore slow or prevent progression to loss of functional autonomy. It should also help to strengthen collaboration between the hospital team of geriatric/neurologist, the pharmacist and the private practice who are all involved in caring for the patient's health. The benefits for the patient are thus optimizing its medical management by linking health professionals met during his care pathway. In addition, pharmaceutical recommendations sent to referent physicians should help raise awareness of the prescription of drugs in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CLINICALTRIALS: NCT02740764.

Anticholinergic drugs and functional, cognitive impairment and behavioral disturbances in patients from a memory clinic with subjective cognitive decline or neurocognitive disorders.

BACKGROUND: Drugs with anticholinergic properties may be associated with various adverse clinical effects. The relationship between the anticholinergic (AC) burden and functional, global cognitive performance and behavior disturbances was assessed among elderly patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2012 and June 2014 in a memory clinic among outpatients living at home and with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or neurocognitive disorders (NCD). The AC burden was measured using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB), Chew's score, Han's score, and the number of drugs with AC activity. Functional, cognitive performance and behavior disturbances were assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale (IADL), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). RESULTS: Among 473 included patients, 46.3% were at major NCD. Patients took on average 5.3 ± 2.6 drugs. MMSE was lower when Han's score (p = 0.04) and number of AC drugs were higher (p < 0.001). IADL was lower when AC burden was higher, whatever the AC measurement. NPI was higher when ACB, Han's score, and number of AC drugs were higher. After adjustment, all AC scores remained associated with IADL, while Han's score and number of drugs with AC remained associated with the MMSE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SCD or NCD, AC burden is associated with lower functional score, whereas the cross-sectional association between AC burden and cognitive performance or behavioral disturbance varies according to AC scores. Particular attention should be paid when prescribing drugs with AC properties, especially among patients with memory complaints.

Risk Factors of Caregiver Burden Evolution, for Patients With Subjective Cognitive Decline or Neurocognitive Disorders: A Longitudinal Analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The identification of factors used to predict caregiver burden may help preventive care. This study aimed to assess the relationship between evolution of patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or progressive neurocognitive disorder (NCD) and evolution of caregiver burden. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal study. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Clinical and Research Memory Center of the University Hospital of Lyon (France), between the November 1, 2011 and the June 30, 2014, with a maximum follow-up of 30 months. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included outpatients with SCD or NCD at all stages, and their informal caregiver. MEASUREMENTS: The caregiver burden was assessed during 2 visits of the patients and their caregiver, with the short version of the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI). Functional, cognitive performance, and behavioral and psychological symptoms were measured twice, concomitantly with the ZBI, using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), respectively. Etiology and stage of the cognitive impairment were collected. RESULTS: The population study included 222 patients (mean age at inclusion: 80 years old, 62.9% females), with an average follow-up 12.6 ± 6 months. Proportion of patients with major NCD at the second visit (62.2%) increased compared with inclusion (50.0%). MMSE and IADL decreased between the 2 visits (P < .001), whereas ZBI increased (mean ZBI: 3.2 ± 2 at baseline, mean ZBI: 3.8 ± 2 at follow-up, P < .001). In unadjusted analyses, ZBI tended to be higher for patients whose MMSE decreased of at least 3 points between the visits. ZBI increased over time when IADL decreased (P value for within-patient effect <.001), while it remained stable when the IADL increased. ZBI increased when NPI increased. After mutual adjustment for change of MMSE, IADL, NPI, and etiologies, increase of ZBI over time remained significant when MMSE decreased at least 3 points between baseline and follow-up, when IADL decreased, and when NPI increased of at least 4 points. CONCLUSIONS: In a study population of patients with SCD or NCD at all stages, concomitant decrease of cognitive performance, increase of functional impairment, and increase neuropsychiatric symptoms over time were independently associated with increased caregiver burden. The identification of risk factors associated with an increased caregiver burden over time may allow a better evaluation of the impact of specific interventions on cognitive, behavioral, and functional dimensions of NCD on caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02825732.

Relationship Between Comorbidities in Patients With Cognitive Complaint and Caregiver Burden: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Informal caregivers of patients with a cognitive impairment may face exhaustion while taking care of their relatives, and are themselves at higher risk of disease. The objective was to assess the relationship between patients' comorbidities evaluated with the Charlson index, and the caregiver burden, independently of health disorders related to cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Memory clinic at the University Hospital of Lyon. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients with cognitive complaint and consulting a Clinical and Research Memory Centre of Lyon (n = 1300). MEASUREMENTS: Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index related to age (CCI). The caregiver burden was measured with the short version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). The relationship was assessed between the CCI and the mini-Zarit and other patients' characteristics: behavior, cognition, autonomy as assessed respectively by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), etiology, and stage of the cognitive impairment. RESULTS: The study included 1300 outpatients: mean age: 80.8 ± 7 years. The mean CCI was 4.8 ± 1.7. The mini-Zarit score: 3.1 ± 2.0. The caregiver burden increased by 0.22 per unit of CCI (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.28, P < .001) in unadjusted analysis. The caregiver burden remained significantly associated with CCI, after adjustment for the MMSE, IADL, and NPI. CONCLUSION: The caregiver burden is higher when patients' comorbidities increase, independently of behavioral and psychological symptoms, level of functional autonomy, and the stage of the cognitive disease. However, dementia may be the comorbidity that contributes the most to caregiver burden.

Preoperative skin antiseptics for prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: a historical-controlled interventional trial comparing aqueous against alcoholic povidone-iodine solutions.

AIMS: Local skin antiseptic prevention against cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections is not yet fully understood. This monocentre historical-controlled study sought to (i) conduct a prospective observational analysis comparing two antiseptic skin preparations over two similar consecutive periods of time, one conducted over a 1-year period using an aqueous povidone-iodine solution (Group I) and the other over the following with an alcoholic povidone-iodine solution (Group II); (ii) determine the predictive factors of CIED infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation was performed in 1326 patients (pts). A total of 32 pts (2.4%) developed a CIED infection. Long-term follow-up (26 ± 3 months) revealed no significant difference between the groups: infections were observed in 14 of the 648 pts (2.2%) in Group I vs. 18 of the 678 pts (2.7%) in Group II (P = 0.9). Single- and multiple-variable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The occurrence of infection was positively correlated with re-intervention (aOR, 7.16; 95% CI, 2.56-19.99; P < 0.0001), number of generator replacements, mean (aOR, 3.47; 95% CI, 2.22-5.44; P < 0.001), and haematoma (aOR, 48.4; 95% CI, 13.45-174.25; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study found that aqueous and alcoholic povidone-iodine solutions displayed similar antiseptic effects regarding CIED infection prevention. Independent predictive factors of CIED infection were re-intervention, haematoma, and number of generator replacements.