CRF1 Receptor Signaling via the ERK1/2-MAP and Akt Kinase Cascades: Roles of Src, EGF Receptor, and PI3-Kinase Mechanisms.

In the present study, we determined the cellular regulators of ERK1/2 and Akt signaling pathways in response to human CRF1 receptor (CRF1R) activation in transfected COS-7 cells. We found that Pertussis Toxin (PTX) treatment or sequestering Gßγ reduced CRF1R-mediated activation of ERK1/2, suggesting the involvement of a Gi-linked cascade. Neither Gs/PKA nor Gq/PKC were associated with ERK1/2 activation. Besides, CRF induced EGF receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation at Tyr1068, and selective inhibition of EGFR kinase activity by AG1478 strongly inhibited the CRF1R-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2, indicating the participation of EGFR transactivation. Furthermore, CRF-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not altered by pretreatment with batimastat, GM6001, or an HB-EGF antibody indicating that metalloproteinase processing of HB-EGF ligands is not required for the CRF-mediated EGFR transactivation. We also observed that CRF induced Src and PYK2 phosphorylation in a Gßγ-dependent manner. Additionally, using the specific Src kinase inhibitor PP2 and the dominant-negative-SrcYF-KM, it was revealed that CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation depends on Src activation. PP2 also blocked the effect of CRF on Src and EGFR (Tyr845) phosphorylation, further demonstrating the centrality of Src. We identified the formation of a protein complex consisting of CRF1R, Src, and EGFR facilitates EGFR transactivation and CRF1R-mediated signaling. CRF stimulated Akt phosphorylation, which was dependent on Gi/ßγ subunits, and Src activation, however, was only slightly dependent on EGFR transactivation. Moreover, PI3K inhibitors were able to inhibit not only the CRF-induced phosphorylation of Akt, as expected, but also ERK1/2 activation by CRF suggesting a PI3K dependency in the CRF1R ERK signaling. Finally, CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 activation was similar in the wild-type CRF1R and the phosphorylation-deficient CRF1R-Δ386 mutant, which has impaired agonist-dependent ß-arrestin-2 recruitment; however, this situation may have resulted from the low ß-arrestin expression in the COS-7 cells. When ß-arrestin-2 was overexpressed in COS-7 cells, CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was markedly upregulated. These findings indicate that on the base of a constitutive CRF1R/EGFR interaction, the Gi/ßγ subunits upstream activation of Src, PYK2, PI3K, and transactivation of the EGFR are required for CRF1R signaling via the ERK1/2-MAP kinase pathway. In contrast, Akt activation via CRF1R is mediated by the Src/PI3K pathway with little contribution of EGFR transactivation.

Desensitization of human CRF2(a) receptor signaling governed by agonist potency and ßarrestin2 recruitment.

The primary goal was to determine agonist-specific regulation of CRF2(a) receptor function. Exposure of human retinoblastoma Y79 cells to selective (UCN2, UCN3 or stresscopins) and non-selective (UCN1 or sauvagine) agonists prominently desensitized CRF2(a) receptors in a rapid, concentration-dependent manner. A considerably slower rate and smaller magnitude of desensitization developed in response to the weak agonist CRF. CRF1 receptor desensitization stimulated by CRF, cortagine or stressin1-A had no effect on CRF2(a) receptor cyclic AMP signaling. Conversely, desensitization of CRF2(a) receptors by UCN2 or UCN3 did not cross-desensitize Gs-coupled CRF1 receptor signaling. In transfected HEK293 cells, activation of CRF2(a) receptors by UCN2, UCN3 or CRF resulted in receptor phosphorylation and internalization proportional to agonist potency. Neither protein kinase A nor casein kinases mediated CRF2(a) receptor phosphorylation or desensitization. Exposure of HEK293 or U2OS cells to UCN2 or UCN3 (100nM) produced strong ßarrestin2 translocation and colocalization with membrane CRF2(a) receptors while CRF (1µM) generated only weak ßarrestin2 recruitment. ßarrestin2 did not internalize with the receptor, however, indicating that transient CRF2(a) receptor-arrestin complexes dissociate at or near the cell membrane. Since deletion of the ßarrestin2 gene upregulated Gs-coupled CRF2(a) receptor signaling in MEF cells, a ßarrestin2 mechanism restrains Gs-coupled CRF2(a) receptor signaling activated by urocortins. We further conclude that the rate and extent of homologous CRF2(a) receptor desensitization are governed by agonist-specific mechanisms affecting GRK phosphorylation, ßarrestin2 recruitment, and internalization thereby producing unique signal transduction profiles that differentially affect the stress response.

Pharmacological characterization of JNJ-40068782, a new potent, selective, and systemically active positive allosteric modulator of the mGlu2 receptor and its radioligand [3H]JNJ-40068782.

Modulation of the metabotropic glutamate type 2 (mGlu2) receptor is considered a promising target for the treatment of central nervous system diseases such as schizophrenia. Here, we describe the pharmacological properties of the novel mGlu2 receptor positive allosteric modulator (PAM) 3-cyano-1-cyclopropylmethyl-4-(4-phenyl-piperidin-1-yl)-pyridine-2(1H)-one (JNJ-40068782) and its radioligand [(3)H]JNJ-40068782. In guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding, JNJ-40068782 produced a leftward and upward shift in the glutamate concentration-effect curve at human recombinant mGlu2 receptors. The EC50 of JNJ-40068782 for potentiation of an EC20-equivalent concentration of glutamate was 143 nM. Although JNJ-40068782 did not affect binding of the orthosteric antagonist [(3)H]2S-2-amino-2-(1S,2S-2-carboxycyclopropyl-1-yl)-3-(xanth-9-yl)propanoic acid (LY-341495), it did potentiate the binding of the agonist [(3)H](2S,2'R,3'R)-2-(2',3'-dicarboxylcyclopropyl)glycine (DCG-IV), demonstrating that it can allosterically affect binding at the agonist recognition site. The binding of [(3)H]JNJ-40068782 to human recombinant mGlu2 receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells and rat brain receptors was saturable with a KD of ∼10 nM. In rat brain, the anatomic distribution of [(3)H]JNJ-40068782 was consistent with mGlu2 expression previously described and was most abundant in cortex and hippocampus. The ability of structurally unrelated PAMs to displace [(3)H]JNJ-40068782 suggests that PAMs may bind to common determinants within the same site. It is noteworthy that agonists also increased the binding affinity of [(3)H]JNJ-40068782. JNJ-40068782 influenced rat sleep-wake organization by decreasing rapid eye movement sleep with a lowest active dose of 3 mg/kg PO. In mice, JNJ-40068782 reversed phencyclidine-induced hyperlocomotion with an ED50 of 5.7 mg/kg s.c. Collectively, the present data demonstrate that JNJ-40068782 has utility in investigating the potential of mGlu2 modulation for the treatment of diseases characterized by disturbed glutamatergic signaling and highlight the value of [(3)H]JNJ-40068782 in exploring allosteric binding.

Structure-activity relationships of 2-arylamido-5,7-dihydro-4H-thieno[2,3-c]pyran-3-carboxamide derivatives as cannabinoid receptor agonists and their analgesic action.

SAR studies were performed on a series of 2-arylamido-5,7-dihydro-4H-thieno[2,3-c]pyran-3-carboxamide derivatives as cannabinoid receptor agonists. Starting from a HTS hit both potency and selectivity could be improved. Modifications to the thiophene fusion and C-3 amides were studied. A representative compound 3t produced analgesia when dosed orally in inflammatory pain models of writhing and carrageenan-induced allodynia.

Molecular and cell signaling targets for PTSD pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy.

The reasons for differences in vulnerability or resilience to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are unclear. Here we review key genetic diatheses and molecular targets especially signaling pathways that mediate responses to trauma and severe stress and their potential contribution to the etiology of PTSD. Sensitization of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling and dysregulation of GR modulators FKBP5, STAT5B, Bcl-2, and Bax have been implicated in PTSD pathophysiology. Furthermore, Akt, NFκB, MKP-1, and p11, which are G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathway molecules, can promote or prevent sustained high anxiety- and depressive-like behavior following severe stress. Agonist-induced activation of the corticotropin releasing factor CRF(1) receptor is crucial for survival in the context of serious danger or trauma, but persistent CRF(1) receptor hypersignaling when a threatening or traumatic situation is no longer present is maladaptive. CRF(1) receptor single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can confer susceptibility or resilience to childhood trauma while a SNP for the PAC1 receptor, another class B1 GPCR, has been linked genetically to PTSD. GRK3 phosphorylation of the CRF(1) receptor protein and subsequent binding of ßarrestin2 rapidly terminate Gs-coupled CRF(1) receptor signaling by homologous desensitization. A deficient GRK-ßarrestin2 mechanism would result in excessive CRF(1) receptor signaling thereby contributing to PTSD and co-morbid posttraumatic depression. Clinical trials are needed to assess if small molecule CRF(1) receptor antagonists are effective prophylactic agents when administered immediately after trauma. ßarrestin2-biased agonists for CRF receptors and possibly other GPCRs implicated in PTSD, however, may prove to be novel pharmacotherapy with greater selectivity and therapeutic efficacy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors induce calcium mobilization through cross-talk with Gq-coupled receptors.

The cross-talk between corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and muscarinic receptors was investigated by measuring evoked transient increases in cytosolic calcium concentration. HEK293 cells stably expressing human CRF type 1 (hCRF(1)) and type 2(a) (hCRF(2(a))) receptors were stimulated with the muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol and shortly after by a CRF agonist. Unexpectedly, this second response was enhanced when compared to stimulating naive cells either with carbachol or CRF agonist only. Priming with 100 microM carbachol increased the maximal CRF agonist response and shifted its concentration-response curve to the left to attain almost the same potency as for stimulating the production of the natural second messenger cyclic AMP. Yet, priming did not affect CRF agonist-stimulated cyclic AMP production itself. Carbachol priming was not restricted to recombinant CRF receptors only since endogenously expressed beta(2)-adrenoceptors also started to produce a robust calcium signal. Without priming no such signal was observed. Similar findings were made in the human retinoblastoma cell line Y79 for endogenously expressed CRF(1) receptors and the type 1 pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptors but not for the CRF(2(a)) receptors. This differentiation between CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptors was further supported by use of selective agonists and antagonists. The results suggest that stimulating a Gq-coupled receptor shortly before stimulating a Gs-coupled receptor may result in a parallel signaling event on top of the classical cyclic AMP pathway.

Corticotropin releasing factor-induced ERK phosphorylation in AtT20 cells occurs via a cAMP-dependent mechanism requiring EPAC2.

CRF-induced ERK phosphorylation has been shown to be an important mechanism underlying expression of pro-opiomelanocortin, a key precursor molecule in the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis. In AtT20 cells, CRF signalling has been investigated but the mechanism behind CRF-induced ERK activity is not fully understood. This paper elucidates the signalling cascade involved in this phenomenon. Involvement of CRF(1) receptor on ERK phosphorylation was shown by using CRF and urocortin 1. The lack of inhibitory effect of pertussis toxin and BAPTA-AM excluded involvement of G(i)-coupling and calcium mobilization respectively. In contrast, the process is suggested to be driven by cAMP since treatment of AtT20 cells with forskolin triggered strong ERK phosphorylation. Treatment with PKA inhibitors had a minor effect on CRF-induced ERK signalling while phosphorylation of CREB was completely abolished. This ruled out involvement of PKA and suggested a role for exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC). Moreover, an activator of EPACs 8-(4-methoxyphenylthio)-2'-O-methyladenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate mimicked CRF-induced ERK phosphorylation. Gene expression analysis showed high levels of EPAC2 mRNA and protein but low levels of EPAC1. Knockdown of EPAC2 expression by the use of specific siRNAs abolished CRF- and forskolin-induced ERK phosphorylation. The current study demonstrates a clear cAMP-dependent but PKA-independent mechanism underlying CRF-induced ERK activity that proceeds via EPAC2 signalling. Further research will provide more insight in the role of EPAC2 in CRF signalling.

Role of CRF receptor signaling in stress vulnerability, anxiety, and depression.

Markers of hyperactive central corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) systems and CRF-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders. Designing more effective antagonists may now be guided by data showing that small molecules bind to transmembrane domains. Specifically, CRF(1) receptor antagonists have been developed as novel anxiolytic and antidepressant treatments. Because CRF(1) receptors become rapidly desensitized by G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) and beta-arrestin mechanisms in the presence of high agonist concentrations, neuronal hypersecretion of synaptic CRF alone may be insufficient to account for excessive central CRF neurotransmission in stress-induced affective pathophysiology. In addition to desensitizing receptor function, GRK phosphorylation and beta-arrestin binding can shift a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to signal selectively via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK-MAPK) or Akt pathways independent of G proteins. Also, Epac-dependent CRF(1) receptor signaling via the ERK-MAPK pathway has been found to potentiate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-stimulated TrkB signaling. Thus, genetic or acquired abnormalities in GRK and beta-arrestin function may be involved in the pathophysiology of stress-induced anxiety and depression.

Molecular mechanisms of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-induced calcium signaling.

The molecular mechanisms governing calcium signal transduction of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors CRF(1) and CRF(2(a)) stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were investigated. Calcium signaling strictly depended on intracellular calcium sources, and this is the first study to establish a prominent contribution of the three major G-protein families to CRF receptor-mediated calcium signaling. Overexpression of Galpha(q/11) and Galpha(16) led to leftward shifts of the agonist concentration-response curves. Blockade of Galpha(q/11) proteins by the small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology partially reduced agonist-mediated calcium responses in CRF(1)- and CRF(2(a))-expressing HEK293 cells, thereby proving a contribution of the G(q) protein family. A small but significant inhibition of calcium signaling was recorded by pharmacological inhibition of G(i/o) proteins with pertussis toxin treatment. This effect was mediated by direct binding of Gbetagamma subunits to phospholipase C. G(i/o) inhibition also elevated cAMP responses in CRF receptor-overexpressing HEK293 cells and in Y79 retinoblastoma cells endogenously expressing human CRF(1) and CRF(2(a)) receptors, thereby demonstrating natural coupling of G(i) proteins to both CRF receptors. The strongest reduction of CRF receptor-mediated calcium mobilization was noted when blocking the G(s) signaling protein either by cholera toxin or by siRNA. It is noteworthy that simultaneous inhibition of two G-proteins shed light on the additive effects of G(s) and G(q) on the calcium signaling and, hence, that they act in parallel. On the other hand, G(i) coupling required prior G(s) activation.

Modulation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGlu2) elicits common changes in rat and mice sleep-wake architecture.

Compiling pharmacological evidence implicates metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2) receptors in the regulation of emotional states and suggests positive modulators as a novel therapeutic approach of Anxiety/Depression and Schizophrenia. Here, we investigated subcutaneous effects of the metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2/3) agonist (LY354740) on sleep-wake architecture in rat. To confirm the specific effects on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were mediated via metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2) receptors, we characterized the sleep-wake cycles in metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2) receptor deficient mice (mGlu(2)R(-/-)) and their arousal response to LY354740. We furthermore examined effects on sleep behavior in rats of the positive allosteric modulator, biphenyl-indanone A (BINA) alone and in combination with LY354740 at sub-effective doses. LY354740 (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) dose-dependently suppressed REM sleep and prolonged its onset latency. Metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2)R(-/-) and their wild type (WT) littermates exhibited similar spontaneous sleep-wake phenotype, while LY354740 (10 mg/kg) significantly affected REM sleep variables in WT but not in the mutant. In rats, BINA (1, 3, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg) dose-dependently suppressed REM sleep, lengthened its onset latency and slightly enhanced passive waking. Additionally, combined treatment elicited a synergistic action on REM sleep variables. Our findings show common changes of REM sleep variables following modulation of metabotropic glutamate mGlu(2) receptor and support an active role of this receptor in the regulation of REM sleep. The synergistic action of BINA on LY354740's effects on sleep pattern implies that positive modulators would tune the endogenous glutamate tone suggesting potential benefit in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, in which REM sleep overdrive is manifested.

Therapeutic potential of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors have received much attention, driven by a strong belief in the potential of these modulatory glutamate receptors as drug targets. So far, major drug discovery programs have largely focused on group I (mGlu1 and 5) and II (mGlu2 and 3) mGlu receptors, which have been implicated in neuropathological and various psychiatric disorders. The four group III representatives (mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8) are less understood, mainly due to the paucity of specific compounds. Recent advances in the identification of selective or specific compounds, and the generation of transgenic animals have, however, revealed important insights into the potential role of group III receptors in the pathophysiology of neurological and mood disorders. Activation of the mGlu4 receptor seems to be beneficial for treating Parkinson-like symptoms and a potential role in the treatment of mood disorders is slowly growing. Similarly, genetic inactivation studies and usage of relatively selective agonists strongly support the involvement of the mGlu8 receptor for anxiety disorders. In contrast, controversial data have been obtained for the mGlu7 receptor. While mGlu7 receptor-deficient animals show an anxiolytic profile in several in vivo readouts, the first selective allosteric agonist AMN082 has also been reported to improve anxiety-like behaviour despite activating the stress axis. The least investigated receptor remains the mGlu6 receptor, which is mostly based on its predominant expression in the retina.

Blocking melanin-concentrating hormone MCH1 receptor affects rat sleep-wake architecture.

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a hypothalamic peptide that centrally regulates food intake, energy balance and emotion. Interestingly, MCH and melanin-concentrating hormone MCH(1) receptors are distributed in brain areas known to regulate vigilance states. Effects of subcutaneous administration of two selective melanin-concentrating hormone MCH(1) receptor antagonists, labeled A and B were examined over a broad dose range (1, 3, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg) on rat sleep-wake architecture. Both compounds have a nanomolar antagonist activity at recombinant human melanin-concentrating hormone MCH(1) receptor (IC(50)=44.1+/-6.1 nM and 26.6+/-5.4 nM, respectively) and potently inhibited the MCH-induced mobilization of [Ca(2+)] (IC(50) 29.1+/-8.1 nM and 10.5+/-4.1 nM, respectively). The selectivity of both compounds was further confirmed on a panel of receptors, transporters and channels. In vivo, both compounds dose-dependently decreased deep sleep primarily by decreasing the mean duration of episodes during the first 4 h post-administration. In parallel, REM sleep and intermediate stage sleep were decreased while active and passive waking increased. Deep sleep and REM sleep onset latencies were significantly prolonged at higher doses. No homeostatic rebound of deep sleep was observed, while a tendency for recovery of REM sleep was found during subsequent dark phase. Together, the results support a role of the melanin-concentrating hormone MCH(1) receptor in the regulation of deep slow-wave sleep-REM sleep cycle. Therapeutic application of melanin-concentrating hormone MCH(1) receptor-inhibiting agents should take into account the significant decreases in deep sleep without recovery as these may interfere with sleep dependent memory consolidation.

Nociceptive and behavioural sensitisation by protein kinase Cepsilon signalling in the CNS.

Despite the apparent homology in the protein kinase C (PKC) family, it has become clear that slight structural differences are sufficient to have unique signalling properties for each individual isoform. For PKCepsilon in depth investigation of these aspects revealed unique actions in the CNS and lead to development of specific modulators with clinical perspective. In this review, we describe to which extent PKCepsilon is distinct from other isoforms on the level of tissue expression and protein structure. As this kinase is highly expressed in the brain, we outline three main aspects of PKCepsilon signalling in the CNS. First, its ability to alter the permeability of N-type Ca2+ channels in dorsal root ganglia has been shown to enhance nociception. Secondly, PKCepsilon increases anxiety by diminishing GABA(A)R-induced inhibitory post-synaptic currents in the prefrontal cortex. Another important aspect of the latter inhibition is the reduced sensitivity of GABA(A) receptors to ethanol, a mechanism potentially contributing to abuse. A third signalling cascade improves cognitive functions by facilitating cholinergic signalling in the hippocampus. Collectively, these findings point to a physical and behavioural sensitising role for this kinase.

Expression, binding, and signaling properties of CRF2(a) receptors endogenously expressed in human retinoblastoma Y79 cells: passage-dependent regulation of functional receptors.

Endogenous expression of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 2a receptor [CRF2(a)] but not CRF2(b) and CRF2(c) was observed in higher passage cultures of human Y79 retinoblastoma cells. Functional studies further demonstrated an increase in CRF2(a) mRNA and protein levels with higher passage numbers (> 20 passages). Although the CRF1 receptor was expressed at higher levels than the CRF2(a) receptor, both receptors were easily distinguishable from one another by selective receptor ligands. CRF(1)-preferring or non-selective agonists such as CRF, urocortin 1 (UCN1), and sauvagine stimulated cAMP production in Y79 to maximal responses of approximately 100 pmoles/10(5) cells, whereas the exclusive CRF2 receptor-selective agonists UCN2 and 3 stimulated cAMP production to maximal responses of approximately 25-30 pmoles/10(5) cells. UCN2 and 3-mediated cAMP stimulation was potently blocked by the approximately 300-fold selective CRF2 antagonist antisauvagine (IC50 = 6.5 +/- 1.6 nmol/L), whereas the CRF(1)-selective antagonist NBI27914 only blocked cAMP responses at concentrations > 10 microL. When the CRF(1)-preferring agonist ovine CRF was used to activate cAMP signaling, NBI27914 (IC50 = 38.4 +/- 3.6 nmol/L) was a more potent inhibitor than antisauvagine (IC50 = 2.04 +/- 0.2 microL). Finally, UCN2 and 3 treatment potently and rapidly desensitized the CRF2 receptor responses in Y79 cells. These data demonstrate that Y79 cells express functional CRF1 and CRF2a receptors and that the CRF2(a) receptor protein is up-regulated during prolonged culture.

Carboxyl-terminal and intracellular loop sites for CRF1 receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin-2 recruitment: a mechanism regulating stress and anxiety responses.

The primary goal was to test the hypothesis that agonist-induced corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF(1)) receptor phosphorylation is required for beta-arrestins to translocate from cytosol to the cell membrane. We also sought to determine the relative importance to beta-arrestin recruitment of motifs in the CRF(1) receptor carboxyl terminus and third intracellular loop. beta-Arrestin-2 translocated significantly more rapidly than beta-arrestin-1 to agonist-activated membrane CRF(1) receptors in multiple cell lines. Although CRF(1) receptors internalized with agonist treatment, neither arrestin isoform trafficked with the receptor inside the cell, indicating that CRF(1) receptor-arrestin complexes dissociate at or near the cell membrane. Both arrestin and clathrin-dependent mechanisms were involved in CRF(1) receptor internalization. To investigate molecular determinants mediating the robust beta-arrestin-2-CRF(1) receptor interaction, mutagenesis was performed to remove potential G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation sites. Truncating the CRF(1) receptor carboxyl terminus at serine-386 greatly reduced agonist-dependent phosphorylation but only partially impaired beta-arrestin-2 recruitment. Removal of a serine/threonine cluster in the third intracellular loop also significantly reduced CRF(1) receptor phosphorylation but did not alter beta-arrestin-2 recruitment. Phosphorylation was abolished in a CRF(1) receptor possessing both mutations. Surprisingly, this mutant still recruited beta-arrestin-2. These mutations did not alter membrane expression or cAMP signaling of CRF(1) receptors. Our data reveal the involvement of at least the following two distinct receptor regions in beta-arrestin-2 recruitment: 1) a carboxyl-terminal motif in which serine/threonine residues must be phosphorylated and 2) an intracellular loop motif configured by agonist-induced changes in CRF(1) receptor conformation. Deficient beta-arrestin-2-CRF(1) receptor interactions could contribute to the pathophysiology of affective disorders by inducing excessive CRF(1) receptor signaling.

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor signaling in the central nervous system: new molecular targets.

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and the related urocortin peptides mediate behavioral, cognitive, autonomic, neuroendocrine and immunologic responses to aversive stimuli by activating CRF(1) or CRF(2) receptors in the central nervous system and anterior pituitary. Markers of hyperactive central CRF systems, including CRF hypersecretion and abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning, have been identified in subpopulations of patients with anxiety, stress and depressive disorders. Because CRF receptors are rapidly desensitized in the presence of high agonist concentrations, CRF hypersecretion alone may be insufficient to account for the enhanced CRF neurotransmission observed in these patients. Concomitant dysregulation of mechanisms stringently controlling magnitude and duration of CRF receptor signaling also may contribute to this phenomenon. While it is well established that the CRF(1) receptor mediates many anxiety- and depression-like behaviors as well as HPA axis stress responses, CRF(2) receptor functions are not well understood at present. One hypothesis holds that CRF(1) receptor activation initiates fear and anxiety-like responses, while CRF(2) receptor activation re-establishes homeostasis by counteracting the aversive effects of CRF(1) receptor signaling. An alternative hypothesis posits that CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptors contribute to opposite defensive modes, with CRF(1) receptors mediating active defensive responses triggered by escapable stressors, and CRF(2) receptors mediating anxiety- and depression-like responses induced by inescapable, uncontrollable stressors. CRF(1) receptor antagonists are being developed as novel treatments for affective and stress disorders. If it is confirmed that the CRF(2) receptor contributes importantly to anxiety and depression, the development of small molecule CRF(2) receptor antagonists would be therapeutically useful.

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor antagonists in affective disorders and drug dependence-- an update.

Dysfunctioning of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its receptors (CRF(1) and CRF(2)) has been linked to the development of stress-related disorders, such as affective disorders and drug abuse. The molecular characterization of CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptors and their splice variants has generated detailed information on their pharmacology, tissue distribution and physiology. In addition, the recent development of a small molecule CRF(1) antagonist has provided important information on the contribution of this receptor to the development of stress-related diseases. Despite the high homology to the CRF(1) receptor and the generation of peptide-based research tools, the physiological role of the CRF(2) receptor is largely unclear. This is due to different expression patterns in rodents and primates and the lack of brain-penetrant CRF(2)-selective small molecule antagonists. However, the CRF(2) receptor may be important for motivational types of behavior essential for survival, such as feeding and defense and impacts on cardiovascular function.

Urocortins of the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis: conservation of structure and function in tetrapod evolution.

Several corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family genes have been identified in vertebrates. Mammals have four paralogous genes that encode CRF or the urocortins 1, 2, and 3. In teleost fishes, a CRF, urotensin I (a fish ortholog of mammalian urocortin 1) and urocortin 3 have been identified, suggesting that at least three of the four mammalian lineages arose in a common ancestor of modern bony fishes and tetrapods. Here we report the isolation of genes orthologous to mammalian urocortin 1 and urocortin 3 from the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. We characterize the pharmacology of the frog peptides and show that X. laevis urocortin 1 binds to and activates the frog CRF1 and CRF2 receptors at picomolar concentrations. Similar to mammals, frog urocortin 3 is selective for the CRF2 receptor. Only frog urocortin 1 binds to the CRF-binding protein, although with significantly lower affinity than frog CRF. Both urocortin genes are expressed in brain, pituitary, heart, and kidney of juvenile frogs; urocortin 1 is also expressed in skin. We also identified novel urocortin sequences in the genomes of pufferfish, zebrafish, chicken, and dog. Phylogenetic analysis supports the view that four paralogous lineages of CRF-like peptides arose before the divergence of the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian fishes. Our findings show that the functional relationships among CRF ligands and binding proteins, and their anorexigenic actions mediated by the CRF2 receptor, arose early in vertebrate evolution.

Irreversible binding kinetics of neuropeptide Y ligands to Y2 but not to Y1 and Y5 receptors.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors type 1 (Y1), type 2 Y2) and type 5 (Y5) were tested for their kinetic properties to bind radiolabeled NPY or PYY. Rapid association and dissociation was observed with recombinant (HEK293 cells) and endogenous (SK-N-MC cells) human Y1 and recombinant mouse Y5 receptors. Recombinant (HEK293) and endogenous (SMS-KAN) human Y2 receptors bound both radiolabels comparable to the Y1 receptors, but only minimal ( approximately 20%) dissociation of both radiolabels was observed after long incubation time (>8 h). Furthermore, neither peptide nor small molecule Y2 ligands efficiently competed for binding to Y2 receptors once association binding had been initiated. The Y2-selective antagonist BIIE0246 behaved as an insurmountable antagonist in functional assays when pre-incubated for 30 min before agonist addition, but was a competitive antagonist when co-applied with the agonist. These data show that Y2 receptors in contrast to Y1 and Y5 receptors bind their ligands in an irreversible manner.

Stimulation of neuropeptide Y-mediated calcium responses in human SMS-KAN neuroblastoma cells endogenously expressing Y2 receptors by co-expression of chimeric G proteins.

Human SMS-KAN neuroblastoma cells endogenously express the neuropeptide Y (NPY) type 2 (Y(2)) receptor. Although ligand binding and GTPgammaS binding studies supported high functional Y(2) receptor expression, only weak coupling to the natural second messenger cyclic AMP was observed. The main reason was the low responsiveness of SMS-KAN cells to forskolin, a direct activator of adenylyl cyclases. In order to obtain a cell-based functional assay for the Y(2) receptor in SMS-KAN cells, the transient calcium (Ca(2+)) mobilization assay in the fluorimetric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) format was established by stably expressing a chimeric G protein Gq(i9). This manipulation resulted in robust mobilization of Ca(2+) after challenge with various NPY-related agonists in a 384-well format. The sensitivity of the FLIPR readout was in the low nanomolar range for NPY agonists and comparable to that of the recombinant Y(2) receptor. The selective Y(2) antagonist BIIE0246 competitively inhibited NPY-mediated Ca(2+) transients in SMS-KAN/Gq(i9) cells with a pA(2) value of 7.39+/-0.1. This is the first evidence that an endogenously expressed G protein-coupled receptor couples to an overexpressed chimeric G protein, thereby functionally responding in the FLIPR readout.