The influence of testing angle on the biomechanical properties of the rat supraspinatus tendon.

Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder pathology. The rat supraspinatus tendon model is commonly employed for preclinical assessment of rotator cuff pathology or regeneration. However, there is a lack of a standardized biomechanical testing protocol; previous studies have tested the tendon at abduction angles ranging from -15° to 90°. This study aimed to assess the effect of abduction/testing angle on the biomechanical properties of the rat supraspinatus tendon. Fourty-eight shoulders (n=12/group) from healthy Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to 4 testing angle groups: 0° (corresponding to 90° abduction), 30°, 60°, and 90° (0° abduction). Biomechanical testing of the supraspinatus was performed, consisting of stress-relaxation and load-to-failure. Mechanical properties were calculated, and nonlinear tensile modeling was performed via the Quasilinear Viscoelastic (QLV) and Structurally Based Elastic (SBE) models. Results indicate that testing angle significantly affects supraspinatus tendon biomechanics. Stiffness and modulus significantly decreased with increasing testing angle (stiffness: 20.93±5.8N/mm at 0° vs. 6.12±1.0N/mm at 90°, P<.001; modulus: 59.51±34.0MPa at 0° vs. 22.37±7.4MPa at 90°, P=.002). Testing angle correlated significantly to ultimate strain, yield strain, and all coefficients of the SBE and QLV models, implying differences in collagen fiber crimp patterns and viscoelastic behavior as a function of testing angle. These results suggest that differences in testing methodology, in particular testing angle, significantly affect the measured mechanical properties of the supraspinatus tendon. Future studies may consider utilizing testing angles of 0°-30°, at which tendon stiffness is maximized, and full standardization of rat rotator cuff testing protocols is necessary.

Retropharyngeal Steroids and Dysphagia Following Multilevel Anterior Cervical Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of retropharyngeal steroids on postoperative dysphagia scores and clinical outcomes following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dysphagia is a well-known complication following ACDF surgery and increased rates of dysphagia are seen with increased levels of surgery. Retropharyngeal steroids have been shown to decrease painful swallowing and prevertebral soft tissue (PSTS) swelling in 1- and 2-level anterior cervical surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of 44 patients undergoing multilevel (2-, 3-, 4-level) ACDF. Twenty-two patients who received retropharyngeal steroids (methylprednisone) placed on a collagen sponge at the time of surgery were compared with a matched cohort of controls who did not receive local steroids. Postoperative day 1 and 6-week radiographs were analyzed for differences in PSTS. Clinical outcomes were measured pre-operatively, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively utilizing the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Bazaz-Yoo Dysphagia Scoring System, and Eat Assessment Tool (EAT-10). RESULTS: Significant improvement in dysphagia scores were seen utilizing both outcome measures. Bazaz-Yoo scores were significantly better at both 6 weeks and 3 months in patients receiving local steroids compared with controls (P = 0.008 and P = 0.022, respectively). EAT-10 showed similar improvement of the steroid group versus control at 6 weeks and 3 months (P = 0.067 and P = 0.012, respectively). A trend toward decreased PSTS was found with locally delivered steroids on initial postoperative radiographs (P = 0.07), but was no longer evident at 6 weeks. NDI, although improved from pre-operative scores, failed to demonstrate significant differences between groups. No differences in length of stay or complications were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of retropharyngeal steroids resulted in decreased rates of dysphagia following multilevel ACDF. Locally delivered methylprednisone did not result in increased rates of short-term postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Biomechanical Characterization of a Model of Noninvasive, Traumatic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in the Rat.

The onset of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) remains prevalent following traumatic joint injury such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, and animal models are important for studying the pathomechanisms of PTOA. Noninvasive ACL injury using the tibial compression model in the rat has not been characterized, and it may represent a more clinically relevant model than the common surgical ACL transection model. This study employed four loading profiles to induce ACL injury, in which motion capture analysis was performed, followed by quantitative joint laxity testing. High-speed, high-displacement loading repeatedly induces complete ACL injury, which causes significant increases in anterior-posterior and varus laxity. No loading protocol induced valgus laxity. Tibial internal rotation and anterior subluxation occurs up to the point of ACL failure, after which the tibia rotates externally as it subluxes over the femoral condyles. High displacement was more determinative of ACL injury compared to high speed. Low-speed protocols induced ACL avulsion from the femoral footprint whereas high-speed protocols caused either midsubstance rupture, avulsion, or a combination injury of avulsion and midsubstance rupture. This repeatable, noninvasive ACL injury protocol can be utilized in studies assessing PTOA or ACL reconstruction in the rat.

The GraftLink ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison with the docking technique in both kinematics and failure tests.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction aims to restore valgus stability, and numerous techniques have been described in the literature. HYPOTHESIS/ PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the GraftLink (GL) technique with traditional bone tunnels used in the docking (DO) technique. It is hypothesized that the GL method will offer a stiffer, less lax construct compared with the DO. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Native and reconstructed states were tested in 7 matched pairs of cadaveric arms. To test kinematics, a 1.5-N·m valgus torque was applied and the resultant displacement at 15° to 90° of flexion was measured. Dissipated energy and the torque at the peak of the 10th cycle of preconditioning were analyzed during kinematic tests. Failure testing was performed by internal rotation of the humerus at 4.5 deg/s in 70° of flexion. Ulnotrochlear joint (UTJ) gapping was quantified during failure tests by use of video tracking. RESULTS: Kinematics testing revealed no differences between the native state and the reconstructed state in either the DO or the GL group at any flexion angle. Stiffness was lower in the reconstructed specimens in both the DO (39.92 N·m/rad) and GL (50.74 N·m/rad) groups compared with their matched native states (DO Native, 71.41 N·m/rad, P = .005; GL Native, 86.36 N·m/rad, P = .002). There was no difference in stiffness between DO and GL. Reconstructed specimens in the GL group had lower torque at failure compared with native specimens (17.404 N·m vs 24.63 N·m, P = .038), but there was no difference in the DO group at failure. There was no difference in torque at failure between DO and GL. The DO exhibited higher angular displacement at failure compared with the native state (34.21° vs 21.79°, P = .010) and compared with the GL when normalized (1.58-fold vs 1.19-fold, P = .039). Compared with their native states, both DO and GL had significantly higher UTJ gapping at 3 N·m and at failure. The DO had significantly higher normalized UTJ gapping than the GL at 3 N·m (P = .037) and at failure (P = .043). CONCLUSION: The DO and GL both restored joint kinematics under low loading conditions. Although less stiff, the GL exhibited lower joint gapping and laxity than did the DO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the biomechanics of UCL reconstruction has significant implications for postoperative management as it relates to early rehabilitation. Biomechanically inferior constructs could risk graft failure or early loosening during rehabilitation, and comparing the biomechanics of new techniques to established, widely used procedures such as the docking technique can provide important information about the immediate postoperative performance.

Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.

BACKGROUND: Numerous variations of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction have been described since the original technique by Jobe et al. Purpose/ HYPOTHESIS: To biomechanically compare the new TightRope technique and the traditional ulnar bone tunnels as used in the docking technique. The hypothesis was that the TightRope technique would exhibit improved kinematics and comparable failure properties. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Seven matched pairs of cadaveric arms (mean age, 44.71 years) were tested in both the native state and reconstructed state. Kinematics were assessed at 15° to 90° of flexion by applying a 1.5-N·m valgus torque and measuring the resultant angular displacement. Failure testing was performed by loading to failure at 4.5 deg/s in 70° of flexion. Sides of a matched pair were randomized to the TightRope (TR) and docking (DO) techniques after testing the native state. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in kinematic results between the native state and reconstructed state in either the TR or DO group at 15° to 75° of flexion. At 90°, the TR group had significantly higher angular displacement (2.23° ± 1.0°) compared with the native state (1.31° ± 0.7°) (P = .020). The TR-reconstructed specimens had significantly lower initial stiffness (49.34 ± 19.3 N·m/rad vs 82.47 ± 36.0 N·m/rad, respectively; P = .007) and total stiffness (53.81 ± 27.8 N·m/rad vs 101.06 ± 34.4 N·m/rad, respectively; P < .001) than did the paired native specimens. In addition, the TR-reconstructed specimens had significantly lower torsional torque at 5° of valgus rotation (mean, 4.61 ± 2.2 N·m vs 7.62 ± 3.7 N·m, respectively; P = .010), at 15° of valgus rotation (12.24 ± 4.4 N·m vs 20.65 ± 6.8 N·m, respectively; P = .002), and at ultimate failure (19.18 ± 7.5 N·m vs 25.42 ± 7.1 N·m, respectively; P = .025) than did the paired native specimens. There was no significant difference in torsional torque between the TR and DO groups at 5° of valgus rotation (4.61 ± 2.2 N·m vs 4.09 ± 1.7 N·m, respectively; P = .644), at 15° of valgus rotation (12.24 ± 4.4 N·m vs 17.94 ± 7.23 N·m, respectively; P = .178), or at failure (19.18 ± 7.5 N·m vs 23.19 ± 10.6 N·m, respectively; P = .444). The DO group exhibited significantly higher angular displacement at failure than did the native state (28.12° ± 8.5° vs 18.04° ± 4.8°, respectively; P = .009), but there was no difference at 3 N·m of loading. There was no significant difference in angular displacement either at 3 N·m or at failure between the native state and reconstructed state in the TR group. CONCLUSION: Both the TR and DO techniques restored native joint kinematics from 15° to 75° of flexion under low loading conditions. While the TR technique exhibited inferior failure torque compared with the native state, the DO technique did not differ from the native state. No differences were found between the TR and DO groups when compared directly. The DO technique restored valgus stability under high loading to a greater extent than did the TR technique but also failed at higher angular displacement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strong postoperative UCL reconstruction fixation is important to restore ulnotrochlear joint stability. Our study demonstrates that the new TR technique has comparable kinematic and failure properties to the traditional DO technique.