RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) after kidney transplant leads to significant morbidity and potentially earlier allograft loss. To date however, reported rates, risk factors and treatment outcomes have varied widely. METHODS: We applied computational phenotypes to a multicenter aggregation of electronic health records data from 7 large pediatric health systems in the USA, to identify recurrence rates, risk factors, and treatment outcomes. We refined the data collection by chart review. RESULTS: From > 7 million patients, we compared children with primary FSGS/SRNS who received a kidney transplant between 2009 and 2020 and who either developed recurrence (n = 67/165; 40.6%) or did not (n = 98/165). Serum albumin level at time of transplant was significantly lower and recipient HLA DR7 presence was significantly higher in the recurrence group. By 36 months post-transplant, complete remission occurred in 58.2% and partial remission in 17.9%. Through 6 years post-transplant, no remission after recurrence was associated with an increased risk of allograft loss over time (p < 0.0001), but any remission showed similar allograft survival and function decline to those with no recurrence. Since treatments were used in non-random fashion, using spline curves and multivariable non-linear analyses, complete + partial remission chance was significantly higher with greater plasmapheresis sessions, CTLA4-Ig doses or LDL-apheresis sessions. Only treatment with anti-CD20, CTLA4-Ig agents, or LDL-apheresis sessions were associated with complete remission. Excluding 25 patients with mutations did not significantly change our results. CONCLUSIONS: Our contemporary high-risk cohort had higher favorable response rates than most prior reports, from combinations of agents.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) body mass index (BMI) z-scores are inaccurate for BMIs of ≥97th percentile. We, therefore, considered 5 alternatives that can be used across the entire BMI distribution: modified BMI-for-age z-score (BMIz), BMI expressed as a percentage of the 95th percentile (%CDC95th percentile), extended BMIz, BMI expressed as a percentage of the median (%median), and %median adjusted for the dispersion of BMIs. STUDY DESIGN: We illustrate the behavior of the metrics among children of different ages and BMIs. We then compared the longitudinal tracking of the BMI metrics in electronic health record data from 1.17 million children in PEDSnet using the intraclass correlation coefficient to determine if 1 metric was superior. RESULTS: Our examples show that using CDC BMIz for high BMIs can result in nonsensical results. All alternative metrics showed higher tracking than CDC BMIz among children with obesity. Of the alternatives, modified BMIz performed poorly among children with severe obesity, and %median performed poorly among children who did not have obesity at their first visit. The highest intraclass correlation coefficients were generally seen for extended BMIz, adjusted %median, and %CDC95th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the examples of differences in the BMI metrics, the longitudinal tracking results and current familiarity BMI z-scores and percentiles. Both extended BMIz and extended BMI percentiles may be suitable replacements for the current z-scores and percentiles. These metrics are identical to those in the CDC growth charts for BMIs of <95th percentile and are superior for very high BMIs. Researchers' familiarity with the current CDC z-scores and clinicians with the CDC percentiles may ease the transition to the extended BMI scale.
