[PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING DUAL PROPHYLAXIS AND LOW DOSE NEURAXIAL MORPHINE FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY].

BACKGROUND: Spinal morphine provides the optimal treatment for post-cesarean analgesia, despite frequent nausea and vomiting. We investigated the incidence of nausea and vomiting 24 hours after cesarean delivery in women receiving intrathecal morphine 100 µcg and intravenous prophylactic dexamethasone and ondansetron. METHODS: In a prospective, observational, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study of women undergoing cesarean delivery according to a standardized anesthetic protocol, the subjects were approached preoperatively and underwent standardized interviews regarding prior anesthesia experience and history of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In the post anesthesia care unit and 24 hours postoperatively, the women were interviewed regarding the incidence of nausea and vomiting, Women with and without nausea at 24 hours were compared for potential associated risk factors. RESULTS: Among 201 women recruited, 29 (14.5%) had nausea and 7 (3.5%) vomited in the postoperative care unit. During the first 24 hours, 36 (17.9%) had experienced nausea and 19 (9.5%) had vomited when interviewed at the 24-hours postoperatively. Women who had nausea 24 hours postoperatively were more likely to have nausea in the post anesthesia care unit than women without nausea during 24 hours after cesarean delivery (41.7% versus 1.2%, p<0.001). We did not find preoperative risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: We report that almost 20% of the women managed with prophylactic dual therapy of ondansetron and dexamethasone had nausea during the 24 hours after administration of low dose intrathecal morphine. Our findings suggested that women who experience nausea or vomiting in the immediate postoperative period are at increased risk of nausea and vomiting in the 24-hour postoperative period.

The Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in a Mixed-Parity Cohort.

BACKGROUND: The effect of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on successful breastfeeding has been evaluated in several studies with divergent results. We hypothesized that LEA would not influence breastfeeding status 6 weeks postpartum in women who intended to breastfeed in an environment that encourages breastfeeding. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, a total of 1204 women intending to breastfeed, delivering vaginally with or without LEA, were included; breastfeeding was recorded at 3 days and 6 weeks postpartum. Primary outcome was breastfeeding at 6 weeks, and the χ test was used for comparisons between women delivering with and without LEA, according to parity status and previous breastfeeding experience. Total epidural fentanyl dose and oxytocin use (yes/no) were recorded. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors affecting breastfeeding at 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall breastfeeding rate at 6 weeks was 76.9%; it was significantly lower among women delivering with LEA (74.0%) compared with women delivering without LEA (83.4%; P < .001). Among 398 nulliparous women, 84.9% delivered with LEA, compared with 61.8% of multiparous women (P < .001). Multiparous women (N = 806) were more likely to breastfeed at 6 weeks (80.0% vs 70.6% nullipara; P < .001). Using multivariable logistic regression that accounted for 14 covariates including parity, and an interaction term between parity and LEA use, LEA was significantly associated with reduced breastfeeding at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.90; P = .015). In a modified multivariable logistic regression where parity was replaced with previous breastfeeding experience, both as a covariate and in the interaction term, only previous breastfeeding experience was associated with increased breastfeeding at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.80; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In our mixed-parity cohort, delivering with LEA was associated with reduced likelihood of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. However, integrating women's previous breastfeeding experience, the breastfeeding rate was not different between women delivering with and without LEA among the subset of multiparous women with previous breastfeeding experience. Therefore, our findings suggest that offering lactation support to the subset of women with no previous breastfeeding experience may be a simple approach to improve breastfeeding success. This concept subscribes to the notion that women at risk for an undesired outcome be offered tailored interventions with a personalized approach.

Anesthetic management of amniotic fluid embolism -- a multi-center, retrospective, cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare and potentially lethal obstetric complication, commonly occurring during labor, delivery, or immediately postpartum. There is a paucity of data regarding incidence, risk factors, and clinical management. Our primary objective in this study was to evaluate clinical presentation of AFE and delineate anesthesia management of these cases. METHODS: This 10 years retrospective multi-center cohort study was performed in five tertiary university-affiliated medical centers, between the years 2005 and 2015. All documented cases of AFE identified according to the ICD guidelines were reviewed manually to determine eligibility for AFE according to Clark's criteria. All cases confirming Clark's diagnosis were included in the cohort. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, 20 cases of AFE were identified, with an incidence of 4.1 per 100,000 births. Average age at presentation was 35 ± 5 years. Seventy percent of cases presented during vaginal delivery, 20% occurred throughout a cesarean delivery, and 10% occurred during a dilation and evacuation procedure. The most common presenting symptom was sudden loss of consciousness in 12 parturients (66.7%), fetal bradycardia in 11 parturients (55%), and shortness of breath in 10 parturients (50%). Perimortem cesarean section was performed in 55% of cases, although only one case was performed in the delivery suite, while all others were performed in the operating room. Echocardiography was performed in 60% of the cases and all were pathological. Furthermore, 20% of cases were connected to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machine. There was a 15% mortality rate of 15%. A further 15% suffered major neurological disability, 25% suffered minor neurological morbidity, and 45% survived without severe complications. CONCLUSION: AFE is associated with significant maternal morbidity. This study highlights the importance of providing advanced training for the delivery suite staff for cases of maternal cardiovascular collapse secondary to AFE and increasing awareness for this rare and devastating obstetric condition.

Perioperative noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and prophylactic phenylephrine drip: a prospective observational cohort study.

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with high incidence of hypotension and is most often prevented by a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion (PPI). In this study, we aimed to identify maternal hemodynamic changes both intraoperatively and postoperatively with the use of the NICaS noninvasive cardiac output monitor in healthy singleton parturients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) with spinal anesthesia and PPI. Methods: Healthy term women undergoing spinal anesthesia for singleton CD were enrolled. The following data were collected - cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), stroke volume (SV), and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Measurements were measured at five time points: (1) before arrival in OR, (2) after spinal anesthesia with pi, (3) after delivery of baby and beginning of oxytocin infusion, (4) in post anesthesia care room (5) 24 hours postoperatively, and (6) 48 hours postoperatively. All parturients received standardized spinal solution consisting of 12 mg hyperbaric, 20 µg fentanyl, and 100-µg preservative-free morphine. PPI was titrated to preserve blood pressure to 20% of baseline and stopped at the end of surgery. Oxytocin was administered as a continuous infusion (20-units/1000 cc Ringer lactate) at a rate of 100 cc/h. Results: One hundred thirty-seven women completed the study. Average age was 34.9 ± 5.7 and average BMI was 30.1 ± 5.1. One hour after delivery in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), there were significant decreases in stroke volume, heart rate, blood pressure, and CO with a concomitant increase in TPR. Within 48 hours the TPR decreased, and CO and stroke volume increased. Conclusions: Significant hemodynamic changes were documented at all time points both intraoperatively and postoperatively with the most significant changes occurring 1 hour postoperatively. Further studies need to be performed to discover hemodynamic changes of spinal anesthesia and PPI in different parturient populations.

The Relationship Between Women's Intention to Request a Labor Epidural Analgesia, Actually Delivering With Labor Epidural Analgesia, and Postpartum Depression at 6 Weeks: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is associated with pain during and after delivery, with studies showing reduced rates among women delivering with labor epidural analgesia (LEA). We hypothesized that women who intend to deliver with LEA but do not receive it are at higher risk for PPD at 6 weeks due to the combined experience of untreated labor pain and unmatched expectations during labor, and evaluated the interaction between labor plans related to LEA, satisfaction with pain control when actually delivering with LEA, and PPD at 6 weeks after delivery. METHODS: A total of 1497 women with a vaginal delivery were enrolled into this prospective longitudinal study. Women's initial intention to deliver with or without LEA, how they subsequently delivered, and satisfaction with pain relief were recorded on postpartum day 1. Primary aim was selected as PPD at 6 weeks among women intending to deliver with but subsequently delivering without LEA compared with the rest of the cohort. Primary outcome was PPD at 6 weeks using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; PPD was defined with a score ≥10 (scale from 0 to 30). Demographic and obstetric data were recorded. Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups. The interaction between intention and actual delivery with regard to LEA and PPD was tested. RESULTS: Overall, 87 of 1326 women completing the study at 6 weeks had PPD (6.6%). For the primary aim, 439 (29.3%) delivered without LEA, of which 193 (12.9%) had intended to deliver with LEA; the PPD rate among these women was 8.1%, which was not statistically different from the rest of the cohort (6.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-2.38; P = .41). A total of 1058 women (70.7%) delivered with LEA and 439 (29.3%) delivered without; therefore, 1169 (78.1%) delivered as intended and 328 (21.9%) did not (unmatched expectations). Evaluating the interaction between effects, there was a strong negative additive interaction between intending to deliver without LEA and actually delivering with LEA (risk difference = -8.6%, 95% CI, 16.2%-1.6%; P = .014) suggesting that unmatched intention effect is significantly associated with negative outcome. In multiple regression analysis, while intending to deliver with LEA (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = .029) and actually delivering with LEA (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .018) both increased the odds for PPD, the multiplicative interaction was protective (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99; P = .022), after adjusting for cofactors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results did not demonstrate a significant increase in the odds for PPD at 6 weeks among women who intended to deliver with LEA but subsequently delivered without. However, we identified a protective interaction between intended LEA use and actual use on the incidence of PPD. Our data suggest an increased risk when women do not deliver as intended, particularly when not initially intending to deliver with LEA. The relationship between unplanned LEA and PPD may be mediated by a physically difficult delivery rather than or in addition to negative emotions related to unmet expectations or a sense of personal failure; therefore, counseling women after delivery to address any negative perceptions may be useful.

A survey of physicians' attitudes toward uterotonic administration in parturients undergoing cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: Oxytocin is globally accepted as first-line treatment for prevention of post-partum hemorrhage. However, there is wide variability in its use in clinical practice. In this study, we aimed to evaluate obstetricians and anesthesiologists attitudes towards uterotonic practices in Israel. STUDY DESIGN: The current survey was designed to study the preferences of obstetricians and anesthesiologists in seven University hospitals regarding the type, dose, and mode of administration of uterotonic drugs, as well as their knowledge regarding the side effects of these drugs. RESULTS: A total of 429 anesthesiologists and obstetricians were approached for participation. Three hundred and ninety-one physicians responded: 48% obstetricians and 52% anesthesiologists. Variations in oxytocin practices were significantly different between obstetricians and anesthesiologists in primary CS (p < .01). Nonetheless, both cohorts reported using an aggressive approach, administering an IV bolus of 5 or 10 units. In repeat CS no significant difference was demonstrated (p = .065). Additionally, we found increased treatment with Methergine as a second-line uterotonic management. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed significant variability in attitudes towards uterotonic management amongst obstetricians and anesthesiologists. Our study highlights the importance of implementing national guidelines for oxytocin use, which will hopefully reduce the use of high bolus dosage usage, thereby increasing patient safety.