Personalizing eating disorder treatment using idiographic models: An open series trial.

OBJECTIVE: Treatments for adults with eating disorders (EDs) only work in about 50% of individuals, and for some diagnoses (e.g., anorexia nervosa; atypical anorexia nervosa), there are no existing evidence-based treatments. Part of the reason that treatments may only work in a subset of individuals is because of the high heterogeneity present in the EDs, even within diagnoses. Manualized treatments delivered in a standard format may not always address the most relevant symptoms for a specific individual. METHOD: The current open series trial recruited participants with transdiagnostic ED diagnoses (N = 79) to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial clinical efficacy of a 10-session network-informed personalized treatment for eating disorders. This treatment uses idiographic (i.e., one-person) network models of ecological momentary assessment symptom data to match participants to evidence-based modules of treatment. RESULTS: We found that network-informed personalized treatment was highly feasible with low dropout rates, was rated as highly acceptable, and had strong initial clinical efficacy. ED severity decreased from pre- to posttreatment and at 1-year follow-up with a large effect size. ED cognitions, behaviors, clinical impairment, worry, and depression also decreased from pre- to posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that network-informed personalized treatment has high acceptability and feasibility and can decrease ED and related pathology, possibly serving as a feasible alternative to existing treatments. Future randomized controlled trials comparing network-informed personalized treatment for ED to existing gold standard treatments are needed. Additionally, more research is needed on this type of personalized treatment both in the EDs, as well as in additional forms of psychopathology, such as depression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Digital Mental Health Interventions: Differences in Diet Culture Intervention Framing.

Diet culture is a societal norm that ranks thin bodies as superior to other body types and has been associated with negative outcomes, such as eating disorders. Wellness has evolved into a term that is often used to promote diet culture messages. One possible way to combat diet culture is through single-session, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which allow for increased access to brief public health treatments. The framing of DMHIs is critical to ensure that the target population is reached. Participants (N = 397) were enrolled in a single-session DMHI, which was framed as either a Diet Culture Intervention (n = 201) or a Wellness Resource (n = 196). Baseline group differences in eating disorder pathology, body image, weight stigma concerns, fat acceptance, and demographic characteristics were analyzed. Across groups, participants reported moderately high eating disorder pathology, low-to-moderate levels of body dissatisfaction, moderate levels of fat acceptance, and either very low or very high weight stigma concerns. Participants in the Diet Culture Intervention group reported higher levels of fat acceptance than those in the Wellness Resource group (p < 0.001). No other framing group differences were identified, though post hoc analyses revealed differences based on recruitment source (i.e., social media versus undergraduate research portal). This study found that framing a DMHI as targeting diet culture or as a Wellness Resource can result in the successful recruitment of individuals at risk of disordered eating. Framing a DMHI as a Wellness Resource may increase recruitment of individuals with low levels of fat acceptance, which may be particularly important for dismantling diet culture, disordered eating, and weight stigma concerns. Future research should assess DMHI framing in other populations, such as men and adolescents.