Do healthcare disparities play a role in pediatric testicular torsion? - Analysis of a single large pediatric center.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare disparities have been shown to impact outcomes of various acute pediatric conditions. We sought to examine the impact of race, ethnicity and insurance status on the presentation, management and outcome of testicular torsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained testicular torsion database was performed. Patients ≤18 years of age evaluated in our pediatric institution's emergency room between April 2016-April 2020 with US diagnosed and OR confirmed testicular torsion were included. Basic demographics, timing of presentation, referral rate, time to OR and orchiectomy rate were extracted and compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients were included. 114 (56.2%) were Black or African American (Black/AA), 43 were (21.2%) Hispanic/Latino, 22 (10.8%) were Caucasian, and 24 (11.8%) were designated as Other races. Ninety-eight (48.3%) patients had Medicaid, 90 (44.3%) had private insurance, and 15 (7.4%) patients were uninsured. Sixty-eight (33.0%) presented in a delayed fashion (>24 h). Compared to the Caucasian patients, Black/AA patients were 2.1 years (95% CI: 0.5, 3.8; P = 0.010) older at the time of presentation. When compared to those with Medicaid insurance, uninsured patients had 6.26 times (95% CI: 1.58, 41.88; P = 0.021) higher odds to be referred from an outside hospital for management. In those patients presenting acutely (<24 h, N = 138), there were no significant differences in the odds of orchiectomy for Black/AA or Hispanic/Latino patients when compared to Caucasian patients, however, the odds of orchiectomy in Other races (non-Caucasian, non-Black/AA, non-Hispanic/Latino) was significantly higher (OR: 10.38; 95% CI: 1.13, 246.96; P = 0.049). While the mean time in minutes from ED to OR was longer in those with Medicaid insurance (141 vs 125.4 private vs 115 uninsured, p = 0.042), this did not impact orchiectomy rate (39.8% vs 40.9% vs 46.7%, p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in the orchiectomy rates by race with the exception of a higher rate in the diverse and heterogeneous Other race (non-Caucasian, non-Black/AA, non-Hispanic/Latino) group. Those uninsured had a higher referral rate highlighting the potential existence of disparities for those uninsured and the need for further investigation.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, management and outcome of testicular torsion in the pediatric population - an analysis of a large pediatric center.

INTRODUCTION To examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, management and outcome of testicular torsion at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained testicular torsion database was performed. Patients ≤ 18 years of age evaluated in our emergency room between 3/11/2020 to 10/1/2020 (during-COVID-19) and the same period in 2018 and 2019 (pre-COVID-19) with US diagnosed and OR confirmed testicular torsion were included. Basic demographics, timing of presentation, referral rate, time to OR and orchiectomy rate were extracted and compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 82 torsions were included in the study; 55 pre-COVID-19 and 27 during-COVID-19. The incidence of testicular torsion remained the same; 3.93 cases/month pre-COVID-19 versus 3.86 cases/month during-COVID-19 (p = 0.791). However, there were significantly fewer delayed (> 24 hours) presentations (11.1% versus 45.5% , p = 0.003), shorter time from onset of symptoms to presentation (median 15.5 hours versus 8 hours, p = 0.001), and a lower but not statistically significant overall orchiectomy rate (33.3% versus 50.9% p = 0.1608) during-COVID-19. Among those presenting acutely with torsion (< 24 hours from onset), no statistical differences were found in the median time from US diagnosis to OR, from ED to OR, referral rate, or orchiectomy rate between the two groups. Lastly, SARS-CoV2 testing did not delay median time from ED to OR. CONCLUSIONS: There was a notably less delayed presentation of testicular torsion and shorter ischemia time on presentation during-COVID, however, no significant change of time to OR or orchiectomy rate in those with acute testicular torsion were observed.

Single-incision percutaneous pericardial ICD lead placement in a piglet model.

INTRODUCTION: Our group has demonstrated the feasibility of percutaneous pericardial ICD lead placement in a piglet model utilizing direct visualization from a lateral thoracoscopic approach. Development of a novel delivery tool that incorporates visualization allows for the procedure to be performed with a 1 cm subxiphoid incision. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 1 cm incision is made in the subxiphoid area and a novel self-anchoring delivery tool is inserted. A rigid thoracoscope and needle are inserted into two crossed working channels of the tool. After needle visualization, pericardial needle access, followed by sheath access is obtained. A modified side-biting ICD lead is inserted and fixated to the ventricular epicardial surface. The lead is connected to an ICD generator and lead testing followed by defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) is performed. Single-incision ICD lead placement was performed in 6 piglets without acute complications. Median time from subxiphoid incision to DFT testing was 64 minutes; median time from thoracoscope insertion to lead fixation was 16.5 minutes (range 9-30). All had adequate ventricular sensing and pacing at implant and underwent successful defibrillation (range 3-5 J). Survival period ranged from 1 to 16 weeks. Two piglets had survival periods of 12 and 16 weeks with mean weight gain of 7 kg; both had successful repeat DFT at 10 J. All survival animals had stable lead impedances and R-wave amplitudes throughout the survival period. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous pericardial placement of an ICD lead using our novel access tool can be safely performed through a 1 cm incision without complications.

Factors Associated with Delayed Presentation and Misdiagnosis of Testicular Torsion: A Case-Control Study.

We identified factors associated with delay in presentation and misdiagnosis of testicular torsion. Compared with acute cases, delayed presentations were more likely to report isolated abdominal pain, developmental disorders, and history of recent genital trauma. Failure to perform a genitourinary examination or scrotal imaging was associated with misdiagnosis.

Testicular Torsion Presentation Trends before and after Pediatric Urology Subspecialty Certification.

PURPOSE: We examined testicular torsion presentation and referral trends at our institution before and after pediatric urology subspecialty certification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients with testicular torsion presenting directly to our pediatric hospital emergency department ("direct") or transferred urgently from an outside institution ("referred") who underwent detorsion and orchiopexy or orchiectomy between 2005 and 2015. Presentations were considered acute (less than 24 hours) or delayed (24 hours or greater) based on time from symptom onset. Primary outcomes were case volume and presentation trends through time. Secondary outcomes were effect of presenting location and transport variables on orchiectomy rate. RESULTS: Incidence of testicular torsion increased from 15 cases in 2005 to 32 in 2015. Annual incidence of direct cases increased slightly during the study period from 12 to 17, whereas incidence of referred cases increased from 3 in 2005 to 15 in 2015. Proportion of referred acute cases markedly increased from precertification (4 of 63, 6.3%) to postcertification period (42 of 155, 27.1%; p <0.01). The majority of referred cases (59 of 83, 71.1%) presented during weekday nights or weekends compared to a minority of direct cases (59 of 135, 43.7%; p <0.01). Orchiectomy rates were similar between direct and referred cases across all study periods and were not significantly impacted by presentation location, transport distance or transport modality (all p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with testicular torsion have been increasingly referred to our institution, with the majority presenting on weekday nights and weekends. Our data do not support routinely transferring these patients to dedicated pediatric hospitals.

Minimally invasive percutaneous pericardial ICD placement in an infant piglet model: Head-to-head comparison with an open surgical thoracotomy approach.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in infants, children, and patients with complex cardiac anatomy requires an open surgical thoracotomy and is associated with increased pain, longer length of stay, and higher cost. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare an open surgical epicardial placement approach with percutaneous pericardial placement of an ICD lead system in an infant piglet model. METHODS: Animals underwent either epicardial placement by direct suture fixation through a left thoracotomy or minimally invasive pericardial placement with thoracoscopic visualization. Initial lead testing and defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) were performed. After the 2-week survival period, repeat lead testing and DFT were performed before euthanasia. RESULTS: Minimally invasive placement was performed in 8 piglets and open surgical placement in 7 piglets without procedural morbidity or mortality. The mean initial DFT value was 10.5 J (range 3-28 J) in the minimally invasive group and 10.0 J (range 5-35 J) in the open surgical group (P = .90). After the survival period, the mean DFT value was 12.0 J (range 3-20 J) in the minimally invasive group and 12.3 J (range 3-35 J) in the open surgical group (P = .95). All lead and shock impedances, R-wave amplitudes, and ventricular pacing thresholds remained stable throughout the survival period. CONCLUSION: Compared with open surgical epicardial ICD lead placement, minimally invasive pericardial placement demonstrates an equivalent ability to effectively defibrillate the heart and has demonstrated similar lead stability. With continued technical development and operator experience, the minimally invasive method may provide a viable alternative to epicardial ICD lead placement in infants, children, and adults at risk of sudden cardiac death.

Initial experience with ketamine-based analgesia in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy and diversion.

INTRODUCTION: We instituted a ketamine-predominant analgesic regimen in the peri- and postoperative periods to limit the effects of narcotic analgesia on bowel function in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The primary end points of interest were time to return of bowel function, time to discharge, and efficacy of the analgesic regimen. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy (RARC) with urinary diversion by a single surgeon at our institution from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. Patients receiving the opioid-minimizing ketamine protocol were compared to a cohort of patients undergoing RARC with an opioid-predominant analgesic regimen. RESULTS: In total, 15 patients (Group A) were included in the ketamine-predominant regimen and 25 patients (Group B) in the opioid-predominant control group. Three patients (19%) in Group A discontinued the protocol due to ketamine side effects. The mean time to bowel movement and length of stay in Group A versus Group B was 3 versus 6 days (p < 0.001), and 4 versus 8 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Group A patients received an average of 13.0 mg of morphine versus 97.5 mg in Group B (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received our ketamine pain control regimen had a shorter time to return of bowel function and length of hospitalization after RARC. Our study has its limitations as a retrospective, single surgeon, single institution study and the non-randomization of patients. Notwithstanding these limitations, this study was not designed to show inferiority of one approach, but instead to show that our protocol is safe and efficacious, warranting further study in a prospective fashion.

Tonsillectomy does not improve bedwetting: results of a prospective controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Sleep disordered breathing caused by tonsillar hypertrophy has been implicated as a cause of primary and secondary nocturnal enuresis in children. We prospectively studied the preoperative and postoperative rates of nocturnal and daytime incontinence in a group of children with tonsillar hypertrophy undergoing tonsillectomy compared to a matched control group undergoing surgery unrelated to the airway or urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 326 toilet trained children 3 to 15 years old were included, with 257 in the tonsillectomy group and 69 in the control group. Severity of tonsillar hypertrophy was graded preoperatively on a scale of 1 to 4. A voiding questionnaire regarding number of bedwetting and daytime incontinence episodes per week, voids per day, bowel movements per week, secondary or primary enuresis and family history was completed by parents preoperatively, and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively the respective rates of nocturnal enuresis and daytime incontinence were 33% and 17% in the tonsillectomy group (p=0.89), and 35% and 14% in the control group (p=0.3). The respective cure rates for bedwetting at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were 40% and 50% in the tonsillectomy group (p=0.60), and 35% and 48% in the control group (p=0.61). Similarly no difference was seen in improvement or cure of daytime incontinence at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between tonsillar hypertrophy and urinary incontinence before or after tonsillectomy.