Identifying and Reducing Insulin Errors in the Simulated Military Critical Care Air Transport Environment: A Human Factors Approach.

INTRODUCTION: During high-fidelity simulations in the Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) Advanced course, we identified a high frequency of insulin medication errors and sought strategies to reduce them using a human factors approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 169 eligible CCAT simulations, 22 were randomly selected for retrospective audio-video review to establish a baseline frequency of insulin medication errors. Using the Human Factors Analysis Classification System, dosing errors, defined as a physician ordering an inappropriate dose, were categorized as decision-based; administration errors, defined as a clinician preparing and administering a dose different than ordered, were categorized as skill-based. Next, 3 a priori interventions were developed to decrease the frequency of insulin medication errors, and these were grouped into 2 study arms. Arm 1 included a didactic session reviewing a sliding-scale insulin (SSI) dosing protocol and a hands-on exercise requiring all CCAT teams to practice preparing 10 units of insulin including a 2-person check. Arm 2 contained arm 1 interventions and added an SSI cognitive aid available to students during simulation. Frequency and type of insulin medication errors were collected for both arms with 93 simulations for arm 1 (January-August 2021) and 139 for arm 2 (August 2021-July 2022). The frequency of decision-based and skill-based errors was compared across control and intervention arms. RESULTS: Baseline insulin medication error rates were as follows: decision-based error occurred in 6/22 (27.3%) simulations and skill-based error occurred in 6/22 (27.3%). Five of the 6 skill-based errors resulted in administration of a 10-fold higher dose than ordered. The post-intervention decision-based error rates were 9/93 (9.7%) and 23/139 (2.2%), respectively, for arms 1 and 2. Compared to baseline error rates, both arm 1 (P = .04) and arm 2 (P < .001) had a significantly lower rate of decision-based errors. Additionally, arm 2 had a significantly lower decision-based error rate compared to arm 1 (P = .015). For skill-based preparation errors, 1/93 (1.1%) occurred in arm 1 and 4/139 (2.9%) occurred in arm 2. Compared to baseline, this represents a significant decrease in skill-based error in both arm 1 (P < .001) and arm 2 (P < .001). There were no significant differences in skill-based error between arms 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of descriptive error analysis during high-fidelity simulation using audio-video review and effective risk mitigation using training and cognitive aids to reduce medication errors in CCAT. As demonstrated by post-intervention observations, a human factors approach successfully reduced decision-based error by using didactic training and cognitive aids and reduced skill-based error using hands-on training. We recommend the development of a Clinical Practice Guideline including an SSI protocol, guidelines for a 2-person check, and a cognitive aid for implementation with deployed CCAT teams. Furthermore, hands-on training for insulin preparation and administration should be incorporated into home station sustainment training to reduced medication errors in the operational environment.

Revolutionizing Combat Casualty Care: The Power of Digital Twins in Optimizing Casualty Care Through Passive Data Collection.

The potential impact of large-scale combat operations and multidomain operations against peer adversaries poses significant challenges to the Military Health System including large volumes of critically ill and injured casualties, prolonged care times in austere care contexts, limited movement, contested logistics, and denied communications. These challenges contribute to the probability of higher casualty mortality and risk that casualty care hinders commanders' forward momentum or opportunities for overmatch on the battlefield. Novel technical solutions and associated concepts of operation that fundamentally change the delivery of casualty care are necessary to achieve desired medical outcomes that include maximizing Warfighter battle-readiness, minimizing return-to-duty time, optimizing medical evacuation that clears casualties from the battlefield while minimizing casualty morbidity and mortality, and minimizing resource consumption across the care continuum. These novel solutions promise to "automate" certain aspects of casualty care at the level of the individual caregiver and the system level, to unburden our limited number of providers to do more and make better (data-driven) decisions. In this commentary, we describe concepts of casualty digital twins-virtual representations of a casualty's physical journey through the roles of care-and how they, combined with passive data collection about casualty status, caregiver actions, and real-time resource use, can lead to human-machine teaming and increasing automation of casualty care across the care continuum while maintaining or improving outcomes. Our path to combat casualty care automation starts with mapping and modeling the context of casualty care in realistic environments through passive data collection of large amounts of unstructured data to inform machine learning models. These context-aware models will be matched with patient physiology models to create casualty digital twins that better predict casualty needs and resources required and ultimately inform and accelerate decision-making across the continuum of care. We will draw from the experience of the automotive industry as an exemplar for achieving automation in health care and inculcate automation as a mechanism for optimizing the casualty care survival chain.

Efficacy of a Single Day Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Training Course for Critical Care Air Transport Team Eligible Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced medical technology that is used to treat respiratory and heart failure. The U.S. military has used ECMO in the care of combat casualties during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom as well as in the treatment of patients during the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. However, few Military Health System personnel have training and experience in the use of ECMO therapy. To address this dearth of expertise, we developed and evaluated an accelerated ECMO course for military medical personnel. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of an accelerated ECMO course for Military Health System critical care teams. METHODS: Seventeen teams, each consisting of a physician and nurse, underwent a 5-h accelerated ECMO course. Similar to our previous live-tissue ECMO training program (phases I and II), each team watched prerecorded ECMO training lectures. Subjects then practiced priming the ECMO circuit, cannulating ECMO, initiating ECMO, and correcting common complications on an ECMO simulation model. An added component to this phase III project included transportation and telemedicine consultation availability. Training success was evaluated via knowledge and confidence assessments, and observation of each team attempting to initiate ECMO on a Yorkshire swine patient model, transport the patient model, and troubleshoot complications with the support of telemedicine consultation when desired. RESULTS: Seventeen teams successfully completed the course. All seventeen teams (100%) successfully placed the swine on veno-arterial ECMO. Of those, 15 teams successfully transitioned to veno-arterial-venous ECMO. The knowledge assessments of physicians and nurses increased by 12.2% from pretest (mean of 62.1%, SD 10.4%) to posttest (mean of 74.4%, SD 8.2%), P < .0001; their confidence assessments increased by 41.1% from pretest (mean of 20.1%, SD 11.8%) to posttest (mean of 61.2%, SD 18.6%). CONCLUSIONS: An abbreviated 1-day lecture and hands-on task-trainer-based ECMO course resulted in a high rate of successful skill demonstration and improvement of physicians' and nurses' knowledge assessments and confidence levels, similar to our previous live-tissue training program. When compared to our previous studies, the addition of telemedicine and patient transportation to this study did not affect the duration or performance of procedures.

A prospective, pragmatic non-inferiority study of emergency intubation success with the single-use i-view versus standard reusable video laryngoscope.

INTRODUCTION: Video laryngoscope (VL) technology improves first-pass success. The novel i-view VL device is inexpensive and disposable. We sought to determine the first-pass intubation success with the i-view VL device versus the standard reusable VL systems in routine use at each site. METHODS: We performed a prospective, pragmatic study at two major emergency departments (EDs) when VL was used. We rotated i-view versus reusable VL as the preferred device of the month based on an a priori schedule. An investigator-initiated interim analysis was performed. Our primary outcome was a first-pass success with a non-inferiority margin of 10% based on the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: There were 93 intubations using the reusable VL devices and 81 intubations using the i-view. Our study was stopped early due to futility in reaching our predetermined non-inferiority margin. Operator and patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The first-pass success rate for the i-view group was 69.1% compared to 84.3% for the reusable VL group. A non-inferiority analysis indicated that the difference (-15.1%) and corresponding 90% confidence limits (-25.3% to -5.0%) did not fall within the predetermined 10% non-inferiority margin. CONCLUSIONS: The i-view device failed to meet our predetermined non-inferiority margin when compared to the reusable VL systems with the study stopping early due to futility. Significant crossover occurred at the discretion of the intubating operator during the i-view month.

Interventions associated with survival after prehospital intubation in the deployed combat setting.

INTRODUCTION: Airway compromise is the second leading cause of potentially preventable death on the battlefield. Prehospital airway management is often unavoidable in a kinetic combat environment and expected to increase in future wars where timely evacuation will be unreliable and air superiority not guaranteed. We compared characteristics of survivors to non-survivors among combat casualties undergoing prehospital airway intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We requested all Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) encounters during 2007-2023 with documentation of any airway intervention or assessment within the first 72-h after injury. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all casualties with intubation documented in the prehospital setting. We used descriptive and inferential statistical analysis to compare survivors through 7 days post injury versus non-survivors. We constructed 3 multivariable logistic regression models to test for associations between interventions and 7-day survival after adjusting for injury severity score, mechanism of injury, and receipt of sedatives, paralytics, and blood products. RESULTS: There were 1377 of 48,301 patients with documentation of prehospital intubation in a combat setting. Of these, 1028 (75%) survived through 7 days post injury. Higher proportions of survivors received ketamine, paralytic agents, parenteral opioids, and parenteral benzodiazepines; there was no difference in the proportions of survivors versus non-survivors receiving etomidate. The multivariable models consistently demonstrated positive associations between 7-day survival and receipt of non-depolarizing paralytics and opioid analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between non-depolarizing paralytic and opioid receipt with 7-day survival among patients undergoing prehospital intubation. The literature would benefit from future multi-center randomized controlled trials to establish optimal pharmacologic strategies for trauma patients undergoing prehospital intubation.

Management of Combat Casualties during Aeromedical Evacuation from a Role 2 to a Role 3 Medical Facility.

INTRODUCTION: Emergent clinical care and patient movements through the military evacuation system improves survival. Patient management differs when transporting from the point-of-injury (POI) to the first medical treatment facility (MTF) versus transporting from the Role 2 to the Role 3 MTF secondary to care rendered within the MTF, including surgery and advanced resuscitation. The objective of this study was to describe care provided to patients during theater inter-facility transports and compare with pre-hospital transports (POI to first MTF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with the Role 2 to the Role 3 transports in Afghanistan and Iraq from 2007 to 2016. Data collected included procedures and events at the MTF and during transport. We compared the intra-theater transport data (Role 2 to Role 3) to data from a previous study evaluating pre-hospiital transports (POI to first MTF). RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 869 Role 2 to Role 3 transport patients. Role 2 to Role 3 transports were longer in duration compared to POI transports (39 minutes vs. 23 minutes) and were more likely to be staffed by advanced personnel (nurses, physician assistants, and physicians) (57% vs. 3%). The sample primarily consisted of military-aged males (mean age 27 years) who suffered from explosive or blunt force injuries. Procedures performed during each phase of care reflected the capabilities of the teams and locations. Pain and cardiac events were more common in POI evacuations compared to the Role 2 to Role 3 transports, but documentation of respiratory events, hemodynamic events, neurologic events, and equipment failure was more common during the Role 2 to Role 3 transports. Survival rates were slightly higher among the Role 2 to Role 3 cohort (98% vs. 95%, difference 3% [95% confidence interval of the difference 1-5%]). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-facility transports (Role 2 to Role 3) are longer in duration, transport more complex patients, and are staffed by more advanced level provider types compared to transports from POI.

Utilization of the En Route Aeromedical Patient Movement Form by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding usage patterns of current paper-based documentation can inform the development of electronic documentation forms for en route care. The primary objective was to analyze the frequency of use of each field within the 3899 L Patient Movement Record documented by en route Critical Care Air Transport Teams. Secondary objectives were to identify rarely utilized form fields and to analyze the proportion of verifiable major events documented within the 3899 L form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3899 L patient movement records for patients transported via Critical Care Air Transport Teams from January 2019 to December 2019. Scanned 3899 L forms were manually transcribed into a Microsoft Access database for evaluation and analysis. Proportions were calculated for completed fields. Major vital sign event frequency was compared for checkbox fields versus the vital sign flow sheet for each patient. We performed descriptive analyses for the proportion of charts with completed documentation in each evaluated field and the proportion of flow sheet events documented in major event fields. RESULTS: We analyzed 130 records. Fourteen of 18 (77.8%) demographic fields had a 75% or greater completion ratio. Sections with the largest proportion of rarely or never utilized fields (<1.5% completed) were procedures (77.8% of fields) and major events (63.9% of fields). Major event checkboxes had low sensitivity for documented events in the flow sheet: Change in heart rate greater than 20% (1 of 28 patients); increase in the fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of greater than 10% (6 of 23 patients); decrease in mean arterial pressure of greater than 20% (1 in 12 patients); and temperature less than 35.6°C (1 in 13 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the current 3899 L fields are highly utilized, but some 3899 L sections contain high proportions of rarely utilized fields. Major event checkboxes did not consistently capture events documented within the in-flight vital sign flow sheet.

A Descriptive Study of Casualties Evacuated Out of Afghanistan by Critical Care Air Transport Teams During the Withdrawal of U.S. Troops.

INTRODUCTION: The War in Afghanistan ended in August 2021. Evacuation from the country was a large effort during the last days of the conflict. During evacuation efforts at Kabul Hamid Karzai International Airport, a suicide bombing occurred necessitating emergent medical care for many injured troops and civilians. The U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) played a role in the medical care provided during the operations in Afghanistan. We report on in-flight events and interventions that took place during the final days of the Afghanistan withdrawal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients requiring aeromedical evacuation from the Afghanistan theater of operations by CCATT from July 1 to August 30, 2021. From the CCATT patient care record, data abstractors collected patient characteristics, flight information, vital signs, laboratory values, in-flight interventions, and in-flight events in a study-specific electronic database. We performed descriptive analyses of patient characteristics and in-flight interventions. This study was approved by the San Antonio Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this analysis. Seven out of nine patients were foreign nationals; the remaining two were U.S. Marines. Five patients suffered penetrating injuries from gunshot wounds and four suffered blast injuries. Six received intravenous narcotic analgesia. Four received intravenous sedatives, and four received antibiotics in flight. Two patients required chest tube management. One patient received blood. Three patients were in acute respiratory distress. CONCLUSIONS: Severe injuries were sustained during the withdrawal efforts at the end of the War in Afghanistan. Critical Care Air Transport Teams played a role in the care and evacuation of patients out of theater during this unique and unprecedented time. Even given the limitations associated with retrospective studies and a small sample size, information reported in this study can help inform future decisions, and aid in preparatory efforts for future operations, that may require medical care by CCATT.

The Ability of Military Critical Care Air Transport Members to Visually Estimate Percent Systolic Pressure Variation.

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate fluid management during patient transport may lead to casualty morbidity. Percent systolic pressure variation (%SPV) is one of several technologies that perform a dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness (FT-DYN). Trained anesthesia providers can visually estimate and use %SPV to limit the incidence of erroneous volume management decisions to 1-4%. However, the accuracy of visually estimated %SPV by other specialties is unknown. The aim of this article is to determine the accuracy of estimated %SPV and the incidence of erroneous volume management decisions for Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) team members before and after training to visually estimate and utilize %SPV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In one sitting, CCAT team providers received didactics defining %SPV and indicators of fluid responsiveness and treatment with %SPV ≤7 and ≥14.5 defining a fluid nonresponsive and responsive patient, respectively; they were then shown ten 45-second training arterial waveforms on a simulated Propaq M portable monitor's screen. Study subjects were asked to visually estimate %SPV for each arterial waveform and queried whether they would treat with a fluid bolus. After each training simulation, they were told the true %SPV. Seven days post-training, the subjects were shown a different set of ten 45-second testing simulations and asked to estimate %SPV and choose to treat, or not. Nonparametric limits of agreement for differences between true and estimated %SPV were analyzed using Bland-Altman graphs. In addition, three errors were defined: (1) %SPV visual estimate errors that would label a volume responsive patient as nonresponsive, or vice versa; (2) incorrect treatment decisions based on estimated %SPV (algorithm application errors); and (3) incorrect treatment decisions based on true %SPV (clinically significant treatment errors). For the training and testing simulations, these error rates were compared between, and within, provider groups. RESULTS: Sixty-one physicians (MDs), 64 registered nurses (RNs), and 53 respiratory technicians (RTs) participated in the study. For testing simulations, the incidence and 95% CI for %SPV estimate errors with sufficient magnitude to result in a treatment error were 1.4% (0.5%, 3.2%), 1.6% (0.6%, 3.4%), and 4.1% (2.2%, 6.9%) for MDs, RNs, and RTs, respectively. However, clinically significant treatment errors were statistically more common for all provider types, occurring at a rate of 7%, 10%, and 23% (all P < .05). Finally, students did not show clinically relevant reductions in their errors between training and testing simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Although most practitioners correctly visually estimated %SPV and all students completed the training in interpreting and applying %SPV, all groups persisted in making clinically significant treatment errors with moderate to high frequency. This suggests that the treatment errors were more often driven by misapplying FT-DYN algorithms rather than by inaccurate visual estimation of %SPV. Furthermore, these errors were not responsive to training, suggesting that a decision-making cognitive aid may improve CCAT teams' ability to apply FT-DYN technologies.

Expert Consensus Panel Recommendations for Selection of the Optimal Supraglottic Airway Device for Inclusion to the Medic's Aid Bag.

INTRODUCTION: Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag. METHODS: We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations. RESULTS: The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport. CONCLUSIONS: A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.

Descriptive Analysis of Intratheater Critical Care Air Transport Team Patient Movements During Troop Drawdown: Afghanistan (2017-2019).

BACKGROUND: The majority of critical care air transport (CCAT) flights are regulated, meaning that a theater-validating flight surgeon has confirmed that the patient is medically cleared for flight and that evacuation is appropriate. If the conditions on the ground do not allow for this process, the flight is unregulated. Published data are limited regarding CCAT unregulated missions to include the period of troop drawdown at the end of the Afghanistan conflict. The objective of our study was to characterize the unregulated missions within Afghanistan during troop drawdown and compare them to regulated missions during the same timeframe. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of all CCAT medical records of patients transported via CCAT within Afghanistan between January 2017 and December 2019. We abstracted data from the records, including mission characteristics, patient demographics, injury descriptors, preflight military treatment facility procedures, CCAT procedures, in-flight CCAT treatments, in-flight events, and equipment issues. Following descriptive and comparative analysis, a Cochran-Armitage test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the trend in categorical data over time. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between vasopressors and preflight massive transfusions, preflight surgical procedures, injury patterns, and age. RESULTS: We reviewed 147 records of patients transported via CCAT: 68 patients were transported in a regulated fashion and 79 on an unregulated flight. The number of patients evacuated increased year-over-year (n = 22 in 2017, n = 57 in 2018, and n = 68 in 2019, P < .001), and the percentage of missions that were unregulated grew geometrically (14%, n = 3 in 2017; 37%, n = 21 in 2018; and 81%, n = 55 in 2019, P < .001). During the time studied, CCAT teams were being used more to decompress forward surgical teams (FST) and, therefore, they were transporting patients just hours following initial damage control surgery in an unregulated fashion. In 2 instances, CCAT decompressed an FST following a mass casualty, during which aeromedical evacuation (AE) crews assisted with patient care. For the regulated missions, the treatments that were statistically more common were intravenous fluids, propofol, norepinephrine, any vasopressors, and bicarbonate. During unregulated missions, the statistically more common treatments were ketamine, fentanyl, and 3% saline. Additional analysis of the mechanically ventilated patient subgroup revealed that vasopressors were used twice as often on regulated (38%) vs. unregulated (13%) flights. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that traumatic brain injury (TBI) was the only significant predictor of in-flight vasopressor use (odds ratio = 3.53, confidence interval [1.22, 10.22], P = .02). CONCLUSION: During the troop drawdown in Afghanistan, the number of unregulated missions increased geometrically because the medical footprint was decreasing. During unregulated missions, CCAT providers used ketamine more frequently, consistent with Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines. In addition, TBI was the only predictor of vasopressor use and may reflect an attempt to adhere to unmonitored TBI clinical guidelines. Interoperability between CCAT and AE teams is critical to meet mass casualty needs in unregulated mission environments and highlights a need for joint training. It remains imperative to evaluate changes in mission requirements to inform en route combat casualty care training.

Improved Adherence to Best Practice Ventilation Management After Implementation of Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for United States Military Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs).

BACKGROUND: Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) play a vital role in the transport and care of critically ill and injured patients in the combat theater to include mechanically ventilated patients. Previous research has demonstrated improved morbidity and mortality when lung protective ventilation strategies are used. Our previous study of CCATT trauma patients demonstrated frequent non-adherence to the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet) protocol and a corresponding association with increased mortality. The goals of our study were to examine CCATT adherence with ARDSNet guidelines in non-trauma patients, compare the findings to our previous publication of CCATT trauma patients, and evaluate adherence before and after the publication of the CCATT Ventilator Management Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of ventilated non-trauma patients who were evacuated out of theater by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) between January 2007 and April 2015. Data abstractors collected flight information, oxygenation status, ventilator settings, procedures, and in-flight assessments. We calculated descriptive statistics to determine the frequency of compliance with the ARDSNet protocol before and after the CCATT Ventilator CPG publication and the association between ARDSNet protocol adherence and in-flight events. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 124 mechanically ventilated patients transported out of theater via CCATT on volume control settings. Seventy percent (n = 87/124) of records were determined to be Non-Adherent to ARDSNet recommendations predominately due to excessive tidal volume settings and/or high FiO2 settings relative to the patient's positive end-expiratory pressure setting. The Non-Adherent group had a higher proportion of in-flight respiratory events. Compared to our previous study of ventilation guideline adherence in the trauma population, the Non-Trauma population had a higher rate of non-adherence to tidal volume and ARDSNet table recommendations (75.6% vs. 61.5%). After the CPG was rolled out, adherence improved from 24% to 41% (P = 0.0496). CONCLUSIONS: CCATTs had low adherence with the ARDSNet guidelines in non-trauma patients transported out of the combat theater, but implementation of a Ventilator Management CPG was associated with improved adherence.

Efficacy of a single-day task trainer-based extracorporeal membrane oxygenation training course.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced medical technology used to treat respiratory and heart failure. The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in significantly more ECMO patients worldwide. However, the number of hospitals with ECMO capabilities and ECMO-trained staff are limited. Training of personnel in ECMO could supplement this demand. Objective: To evaluate our previously developed ECMO course using a task trainer-based training, as opposed to an existing live tissue-training model, and determine if such a program was adequate and could be expanded to other facilities. Methods: Seventeen teams, each consisting of a physician and nurse, underwent a 5 hour accelerated ECMO course in which they watched prerecorded ECMO training lectures, primed circuit, cannulated, initiated ECMO, and corrected common complications. Training success was evaluated via knowledge and confidence assessments and observation of each team attempting to initiate ECMO while troubleshooting complications on a Yorkshire swine. Results: Seventeen teams successfully completed the course. Sixteen teams (94%, 95% CI = 71%-100%) successfully placed the swine on veno-arterial ECMO. Of those 16 teams, 15 successfully transitioned to veno-arterial-venous ECMO. The knowledge assessments and confidence levels of physicians and nurses increased by 24.3% from pretest (mean of 65.3%, SD 14.4%) to posttest (mean of 89.6%, SD 10.3%), p < 0.0001. Conclusions: An abbreviated one day lecture and hands-on task trainer-based ECMO course resulted in a high rate of successful skill demonstration and improvement of physicians' and nurses' knowledge assessments and confidence levels, similar to our previous live tissue training program.

Imaging characteristics and CT sensitivity for pyogenic spinal infections.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing pyogenic spinal infection (PSI), but it is not always available. Our objective was to describe pyogenic spinal infection imaging characteristics in patients presenting to a community emergency department (ED) and estimate the computed tomography (CT) sensitivity for these infections. METHODS: We examined the MRI reports from a cohort of 88 PSI patients whom we enrolled in a prospective cohort study and report the prevalence of each PSI type (spinal epidural abscess/infection, vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis, septic facet, and paravertebral abscess/infection) according to contemporary nomenclature. In a 14 patient subcohort who underwent both CT and MRI studies, we report the sensitivity for each PSI from a post hoc blinded overread of the CT imaging by a single neuroradiologist. RESULTS: Of the 88 PSI patients, the median age was 55 years, and 31% were female. The PSI prevalence included: spinal epidural abscess/infection (SEA) in 61(69%), vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis (VO/D) in 54 (61%), septic facet (SF) in 15 (17%), and paravertebral abscess/infection (PVA) in 53 (60%). Of the SEAs, 82% (50/61) were associated with other spinal infections, while 18% (11/61) were isolated SEAs. The overall CT sensitivity in a masked overread was 79% (11/14) for any PSI, 83% (10/12) for any infection outside the spinal canal, and only 18% (2/11) for SEA. CONCLUSION: Patients found to have vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis, septic facet, and paravertebral infections frequently had a SEA coinfection. CT interpretation by a neuroradiologist had moderate sensitivity for infections outside the spinal canal but had low sensitivity for SEA.

Relevance of Deployment Experience and Clinical Practice Characteristics on Military Critical Care Air Transport Team Readiness: A Study of Simulation Construct Validity.

INTRODUCTION: The Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) Advanced course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to train CCATT personnel and assess their readiness for deployment. This study aims to (1) determine whether these simulations correctly discriminate between students with previous deployment experience ("experienced") and no deployment experience ("novices") and (2) examine the effects of students' clinical practice environment on their performance during training simulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Critical Care Air Transport Team Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/no pass) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students' specialty, previous exposure to the CCATT Advanced course, previous CCATT deployment experience, years in clinical practice (<5, 5-15, and >15 years), and daily practice of critical care (yes/no), as well as a description of the students' hospital to include the total number of hospital (<100, 100-200, 201-400, and >400) and intensive care unit (0, 1-10, 11-20, and >20) beds. Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCATT Advanced course. RESULTS: A total of 2,723 surveys were analyzed: 841 (31%) were physicians (MDs), 1,035 (38%) were registered nurses, and 847 (31%) were respiratory therapists (RTs); 641 (24%) of the students were repeating the course for sustainment training and 664 (24%) had previous deployment experience. Grouped by student specialty, the MDs', registered nurses', and RTs' pass rates were 92.7%, 90.6%, and 85.6%, respectively. Multivariable regression results demonstrated that deployment experience was a robust predictor of passing. In addition, the >15 years in practice group had a 47% decrease in the odds of passing as compared to the 5 to 15 years in practice group. Finally, using MDs as the reference, the RTs had a 61% decrease in their odds of passing. The daily practice of critical care provided a borderline but nonsignificant passing advantage, whereas previous CCATT course exposure had no effect. CONCLUSION: Our primary result was that the CCATT Advanced simulations that are used to evaluate whether the students are mission ready successfully differentiated "novice" from "experienced" students; this is consistent with valid simulation constructs. Finally, novice CCATT students do not sustain their readiness skills during the period between mandated refresher training.

Hemodynamic events during en route critical care for patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to stressors of flight may increase risk of secondary insults among critically injured combat casualties wounded with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of hemodynamic events by phase of transport among patients with TBI transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 477 adults with moderate to severe TBI, who required transport by CCATT to Germany from multiple hospitals in the Middle East between January 2007 and May 2014. We abstracted clinical data from handwritten CCATT medical records. Hemodynamic events included systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg and cerebral perfusion pressure <60 mm Hg. We calculated the proportion of patients experiencing hemodynamic events for each phase of flight. RESULTS: We analyzed 404 subjects after exclusions for catastrophic brain injury (n = 39) and missing timestamps (n = 34). Subjects had high Injury Severity Scores (median, 29; interquartile range [IQR], 21-35) and a median flight time of 423 minutes (IQR, 392.5-442.5 minutes). The median of documented in-flight vital signs was 8 measurements (IQR, 6.5-8 measurements). Documented systolic blood pressure in-flight events occurred in 3% of subjects during ascent, 7.9% during early flight, 7.7% during late flight, and 2.2% during descent, with an overall in-flight prevalence of 13.9%. Among patients with intracranial pressure monitoring (n = 120), documented cerebral perfusion pressure events occurred in 5% of subjects during ascent, 23% during early flight, 17% during late flight, and 5.8% during descent, with an overall in-flight prevalence of 30.8%. CONCLUSION: Documented hemodynamic events occurred during each phase of flight in severely injured combat casualties wounded with TBI, and episodic documentation likely underestimated the actual in-flight frequency of secondary insults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological; Level IV.

En Route Critical Care Evacuations From Rarely Utilized Partner Medical Treatment Facilities: A Case Series With Lessons Learned.

Retaining lessons learned from Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) missions is essential given the recent decrease in operational currency among CCAT personnel. The objective of this case series was to identify and analyze logistical lessons learned from recent critical care transports involving foreign medical treatment facilities with sufficient detail for the CCAT community to incorporate these lessons into future readiness and sustainment training. The provider from each mission submitted a mission narrative with lessons learned. A qualitative analysis of lessons learned described themes from the lessons, as well as similarities and differences from included missions. Three missions were reviewed and four distinct mission stages were identified: (1) pre-mission, (2) at U.S. aircraft, (3) away from U.S. aircraft, and (4) post-mission. Pre-mission lessons learned included the need for professional civilian attire for deployed CCAT teams and the limited availability of pre-mission clinical information. Lessons learned at the aircraft included the following: the need for flexible mission timelines, coordinate and pre-plan transitions with foreign medical teams when possible, and plan for difficult environmental conditions if flight line transfer is required. Lessons learned away from the aircraft included communication challenges between CCAT and the aircraft, contingency planning for narcotic transports, and equipment interoperability issues. Post-mission lessons learned included the need for written communication to disseminate information to the CCAT community. This case series described logistical challenges that present during transport missions involving foreign hospitals. This published series will enable dissemination to the en route care community for possible incorporation into future training.

Association of Hypocalcemia With Mortality of Combat Casualties With Brain Injury and Polytrauma Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Hypocalcemia at hospital presentation is associated with increased mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. The 2019 updates to the Joint Trauma System Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) Clinical Practice Guideline recommend calcium supplementation for ionized calcium (iCa) measurements <1.2 mmol/L. Ionized calcium goals for en route critical care (ERCC) following DCR are less defined, and the impact of in-flight hypocalcemia events among critically injured combat wounded is unknown. This study aimed to describe the association between hypocalcemia and mortality for combat-wounded with brain injury and polytrauma requiring transport by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury transported by CCATT out of combat theater between January 2007 and May 2014. Additional inclusion criteria included polytrauma and at least one documented in-flight iCa measurement. We categorized exposures based on the minimum in-flight iCa measurement as severe hypocalcemia (iCa <0.9 mmol/L), hypocalcemia (iCa 0.9-1.11 mmol/L), and never hypocalcemic (iCa ≥1.12 mmol/L). The primary outcome measure was mortality. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between hypocalcemia and mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 190 subjects, with a median age of 24 years (interquartile range [IQR] 21 to 29 years) and 97.7% male gender. Explosive injuries (82.1%) and gunshot wounds (6.3%) were the most common mechanisms of injury. The median injury severity score was 34 (IQR 27 to 43). During the flight, 11.6% of patients had severe hypocalcemia, and 39.5% had hypocalcemia. Among patients with any hypocalcemia measurement in-flight (n = 97), 41.2% had hypocalcemia on pre-flight iCa, 28.9% received blood products in-flight, and 23.7% received in-flight calcium supplementation. Only 32.4% of patients with hypocalcemia or severe hypocalcemia in the setting of vasopressor administration received in-flight calcium supplementation. There was no significant difference in mortality between severe hypocalcemia (9.1%), hypocalcemia (5.3%), and never hypocalcemic (3.2%) patients even after controlling for pre-flight variables. CONCLUSION: In-flight hypocalcemia events were common among critically ill combat-wounded polytrauma patients transported by CCATT but were not associated with differences in mortality. Future training should emphasize the need for calcium correction among ERCC patients requiring vasopressors. Future studies with larger sample sizes of patients receiving ERCC are needed to assess the association between in-flight calcium supplementation with clinical outcomes.

Evacuation Strategies for U.S. Casualties with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with and without Polytrauma.

INTRODUCTION: According to the Military Health System Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Center of Excellence, 51,261 service members suffered moderate to severe TBI in the last 21 years. Moderate to severe TBI in service members is usually related to blast injury in combat operations, which necessitates medical evacuation to higher levels of care. Prevention of secondary insult, and mitigation of the unique challenges associated with the transport of TBI patients in a combat setting are important in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this injury. The primary goal of this study was a secondary analysis comparing the impact of time to transport on clinical outcomes for TBI patients without polytrauma versus TBI patients with polytrauma transported out of the combat theater via Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). Our secondary objective was to describe the occurrence of in-flight events and interventions for TBI patients without polytrauma versus TBI with polytrauma to assist with mission planning for future transports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 438 patients with TBI who were evacuated out of theater by CCATT from January 2007 to May 2014. Polytrauma was defined as abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of at least three to another region in addition to head/neck. Time to transport was defined as the time (in days) from injury to CCATT evacuation out of combat theater. We calculated descriptive statistics and examined the associations between time to transport and preflight characteristics, in-flight interventions and events, and clinical outcomes for TBI patients with and without polytrauma. RESULTS: We categorized patients into two groups, those who had a TBI without polytrauma (n = 179) and those with polytrauma (n = 259). Within each group, we further divided those that were transported within 1 day of injury, in 2 days, and 3 or more days. Patients with TBI without polytrauma transported in 1 or 2 days were more likely to have a penetrating injury, an open head injury, a preflight Glascow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or lower, and be mechanically ventilated compared to those transported later. Patients without polytrauma who were evacuated in 1 or 2 days required more in-flight interventions compared to patients without polytrauma evacuated later. Patients with polytrauma who were transported in 2 days were more likely to receive blood products, and patients with polytrauma who were evacuated within 1 day were more likely to have had at least one episode of hypotension en route. Polytrauma patients who were evacuated in 2-3 days had higher hospital days compared to polytrauma with earlier evacuations. There was no significant difference in mortality between any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe TBI transported via CCATT, early evacuation was associated with a higher rate of in-flight hypotension in polytrauma patients. Furthermore, those who had TBI without polytrauma that were evacuated in 1-2 days received more in-flight supplementary oxygen, blood products, sedatives, and paralytics. Given the importance of minimizing secondary insults in patients with TBI, recognizing this in this subset of the population may help systematize ways to minimize such events. Traumatic Brain Injury patients with polytrauma may benefit from further treatment and stabilization in theater prior to CCATT evacuation.