Efficacy and safety of an inactivated whole-virion vaccine against COVID-19, QazCovid-in®, in healthy adults: A multicentre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial with a 6-month follow-up.

Background: Vaccination remains the primary measure to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, further necessitating the use of effective licensed vaccines. Methods: From Dec 25, 2020, to July 11, 2021, we conducted a multicenter, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 efficacy trial of the QazCovid-in® vaccine with a 180-day follow-up period in three clinical centres in Kazakhstan. A total of 3000 eligible participants aged 18 years or older were randomly assigned (4:1) to receive two doses of the vaccine (5 µg each, 21 days apart) or placebo administered intramuscularly. QazCovid-in® is a whole-virion formaldehyde-inactivated anti-COVID-19 vaccine, adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. The primary endpoint was the incidence of symptomatic cases of the SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR starting from day 14 after the first immunisation. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04691908. Findings: The QazCovid-in® vaccine was safe over the 6-month monitoring period after two intramuscular immunisations inducing only local short-lived adverse events. The concomitant diseases of participants did not affect the vaccine safety. Out of 2400 vaccinated participants, 31 were diagnosed with COVID-19; 43 COVID-19 cases were recorded in 600 placebo participants with onset of 14 days after the first dose within the 180-day observation period. Only one severe COVID-19 case was identified in a vaccine recipient with a comorbid chronic heart failure. The protective efficacy of the QazCovid-in® vaccine reached 82·0% (95% CI 71.1-88.5) within the 180-day observation period. Interpretation: Two immunisations with the inactivated QazCovid-in® vaccine achieved 82·0% (95% CI 71.1-88.5) protective efficacy against COVID-19 within a 180-day follow-up period. Funding: The work was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan within the framework of the Scientific and Technical Program "Development of a vaccine against coronavirus infection COVID-19". State registration number 0.0927.

Safety and immunogenicity of a QazCovid-in® inactivated whole-virion vaccine against COVID-19 in healthy adults: A single-centre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and an open-label phase 2 clinical trials with a 6 months follow-up in Kazakhstan.

BACKGROUND: A new inactivated whole-virion QazCovid-in® vaccine against COVID-19 was developed from SARS-CoV-2 isolated in Kazakhstan, inactivated by formaldehyde, and adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials aimed at assessing the vaccine's safety, immunogenicity, and the duration of immunity induced by the QazCovid-in® vaccine after one or two immunisations. METHODS: From 23.09.2020 to 19.03.2021 we performed a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trial and from 18.10.2020 to 17.04.2021 an open-label phase 2 clinical trials of the QazCovid-in® vaccine with a 6 months follow-up at a single centre in Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan. Eligible healthy adults aged 18 years and older with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomly assigned to the treatment groups using a computerised randomisation scheme generator. In the phase 1 clinical trial, two doses of the vaccine (5 µg each) or placebo (0·9% NaCl) were administered intramuscularly to 44 subjects aged 18-50 years, 21 days apart. In the phase 2 trial, 200 healthy participants were randomised into four equal-sized groups according to the age (18-49 or ≥50 years) and either single (day 1) or double (day 1 and 21) vaccination protocol. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity. The cellular response was measured by a whole-blood cytokine release assay (phase 1 only). The trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04530357. FINDINGS: The QazCovid-in® vaccine was safe and well-tolerated and induced predominantly mild adverse events; no serious or severe adverse events were recorded in both trials. In the phase 1 trial, the percentage of subjects with a fourfold increase of antibody titres (sero conversion) in MNA was 59% after one vaccine dose and amounted to 100% after two doses. Neutralizing antibody titres reached the geometric mean titre (GMT) of 100 after administration of two doses. A statistically significant increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines after vaccination indicated the Th1-biased response. On day 180, 40% of placebo-treated subjects demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the levels of antibodies measured by both ELISA and MNA, which suggests the infection with SARS-CoV-2. In the phase 2 trial, 100% of subjects aged 18-49 years seroconverted for SARS-CoV-2 on day 21 after the first dose, as indicated by MNA yielding the GMTs of 32 or 30 in the one- and two-dose groups, respectively. Amongst ≥50-year-old subjects, the number of sero conversions in the two- and one-dose groups on day 21 was 94% and 92% with the respective GMTs of 25 and 24. After the second dose, the sero conversion rate reached 100%; however, the GMT was significantly lower when compared with the corresponding value measured in subjects aged 18-49 years (83 vs 143). In both trials, specific antibodies were detected in MNA and ELISA on study day 180, but the titres dropped in comparison to day 42. The results of this study serve as the rationale for the phase 3 study. INTERPRETATION: The QazCovid-in® vaccine is safe and well-tolerated and promotes pronounced humoral immunity which lasts for at least 6 months after double intramuscular immunisation. FUNDING: The work was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the framework of the Scientific and Technical Program "Development of a vaccine against coronavirus infection COVID-1900 . State registration number ?.0927.

Safety and immunogenicity of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults 60 years of age and older: a phase II, a randomized, comparative trial in Kazakhstan.

BACKGROUND: The study was aimed at comparative evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine RIBSP versus commercial vaccine VAXIGRIP® for immunogenicity and safety in the course of clinical trial phase II on healthy subjects up to 60 years. METHODS: The trial involved 150 subjects in randomized 2:1 groups that received either RIBSP vaccine or comparator vaccine VAXIGRIP®. One dose (0.5 ml) of either vaccine contained 15 µg of hemagglutinin of each influenza virus strain recommended by WHO for the Northern hemisphere in 2016-2017 flu season. The observation period lasted 21 days. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03016143. RESULTS: Assessment of immunogenic activity of the vaccine under study showed that in 21 days the portion of participants with 4-fold seroconversions was 80.0% to А/H1N1; 65.0% to А/H3N2 and 64.0% to B virus. Antibody titer increase factor in the group of subjects that received RIBSP vaccine was 13.4 for А/H1N1; 5.2 for А/H3N2 and 5.2 for B virus. The subjects that received RIBSP vaccine demonstrated 88% seroprotection rate against А/H1N1; 75% against А/H3N2 and 61% against B virus. In the course of evaluating the vaccine safety, no serious adverse events were recorded. All changes of laboratory data were slight and single in most cases. All recorded local reactions have been light in character and these have been predicted reactions observed at vaccination against influenza. CONCLUSION: Comparison vaccines RIBSP and VAXIGRIP®, showed similar immunogenic activity. The RIBSP vaccine is safe and immunogenic for the elderly and conforms to international criteria in CPMP/BWP/214/96.

Safety and immunogenicity of the novel seasonal preservative- and adjuvant-free influenza vaccine: Blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial.

The producers of influenza vaccines are not capable today to meet the global demand for an influenza vaccine in case of pandemic, so the World Health Organization recommends to develop the own influenza vaccine production in each country. A domestic preservative- and adjuvant-free trivalent split vaccine against seasonal influenza was developed at the Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems. The paper presents the results of assessing safety and immunogenicity of the influenza split vaccine after single immunization of healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years in the course of Phase I Clinical Trials. This study was randomized, blind, and placebo-controlled. The volunteers were intramuscularly vaccinated with a dose of split vaccine or placebo. The study has shown that all local and systemic reactions had low degree of manifestation and short-term character, so there was no need in medication. Serious side effects were not observed. On day 21 post vaccination the portion of vaccinated persons with fourfold seroconversions to influenza А/H1N1pdm09 virus was 100.0%, to influenza А/H3N2 virus-95.5%, to influenza B virus-81.8%, and in placebo group this index was 0%. Seroprotection rates against influenza А/H1N1pdm09, А/H3N2 and B viruses were 95.5, 86.3, and 72.7%, respectively. Geometric mean titers (GMT) of antibodies by day 21 post vaccination reached 175.7 for influenza А/H1N1pdm09 virus, 64.2 for influenza А/H3N2 virus, and 37.6 for influenza B virus; in placebo group GMT growth was not observed. So, the seasonal influenza split vaccine is well tolerated and fits all immunogenicity criteria for human influenza vaccines.

Immunogenicity and safety of a novel seasonal influenza preservative-free vaccine manufactured in Kazakhstan: Results of a randomized, comparative, phase II clinical trial in adults.

BACKGROUND: The study was aimed at comparative evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine RIBSP versus commercial vaccine VAXIGRIP® for immunogenicity and safety in the course of clinical trial phase II on healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years. METHODS: The trial involved 150 subjects in randomized 2:1 groups that received either RIBSP vaccine or comparator vaccine VAXIGRIP®. One dose (0.5 ml) of either vaccine contained 15 µg of hemagglutinin of each influenza virus strain recommended by WHO for the Northern hemisphere in 2016-2017 flu season. The observation period lasted 21 day. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 03016143. RESULTS: Assessment of immunogenic activity of the vaccine under study showed that in 21 day the portion of participants with 4-fold seroconversions was 87.0% to A/H1N1; 63.0% to A/H3N2 and 59.0% to B virus. Antibody titer increase factor in the group of subjects that received RIBSP vaccine was 23.3 for A/H1N1; 4.4 for A/H3N2 and 4.5 for B virus. The volunteers that received RIBSP vaccine demonstrated 95% seroprotection level against A/H1N1; 84% against A/H3N2 and 80% against B virus. RIBSP vaccine met the CHMP criteria of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CPMP/BWP/214/96). In the course of evaluating the vaccine safety no serious undesirable effects were recorded. All changes of laboratory data were slight and single in most cases. All recorded local reactions have been light in character and these have been predicted reactions observed at vaccination against influenza. CONCLUSION: Comparison of the allantoic inactivated split vaccine obtained in vaccines RIBSP and VAXIGRIP®, showed similar immunogenic activity. Both vaccines were safe for the study participants.