RESUMO
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common mental health diagnosis observed in the primary care population and is associated with a variety of psychological and physical symptoms. BPD is a challenging disorder to recognize due to the limitations of accurate diagnosis and identification in primary care settings. It is also difficult to treat due to its complexity (e.g., interpersonal difficulties and patterns of unsafe behaviors, perceived stigma) and healthcare professionals often feel overwhelmed when treating this population. The aim of this article is to describe the impact of BPD in primary care, review current state of knowledge, and provide practical, evidence-based treatment approaches for these patients within this setting. Due to the lack of evidence-based pharmacological treatments, emphasis is placed on describing the framework for treatment, identifying psychotherapeutic opportunities, and managing responses to difficult clinical scenarios. Furthermore, we discuss BPD treatment as it relates to populations of special interest, including individuals facing societal discrimination and adolescents. Through this review, we aim to highlight gaps in current knowledge around managing BPD in primary care and provide direction for future study.
RESUMO
Importance: Suicide prevention implementation in primary care is needed due to the increasing rate of suicide in the past few decades, particularly for young and marginalized people. Primary care is the most likely point of contact for suicidal patients in the healthcare system. Attention to the level of medical integration with behavioral health is vital to suicide prevention and is applied throughout this review. Methods: A narrative review was performed. Observations: Many interventions help improve suicide prevention care. PCP education, screening, safety planning/lethal means reduction, care transitions, psychotherapy, and medication management are all evidence-based strategies. Additionally, the pragmatic topics of financing suicide prevention, supporting providers, enacting suicide postvention, and preparing for future directions in the field at each level of primary care/behavioral health integration are discussed. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings are clinically relevant for practices interested in implementing evidence-based suicide prevention strategies by attending to the behavioral health/medical interface. Leveraging the patient/provider relationship to allow for optimal suicide prevention care requires clinics to structure provider time to allow for emotionally present care. Defining clear roles for staff and giving attention to provider well being are also critical factors to supporting primary care-based suicide prevention efforts.
RESUMO
Importance: Individuals with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia have a higher risk of adverse outcomes from cardiovascular diseases. Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is needed for stroke prevention, but whether patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia face disparities in receiving this therapy is unknown. Objective: To assess whether bipolar disorder or schizophrenia is associated with a lower rate of OAT initiation in patients with incident AF and lower prevalence of OAT in those with prevalent AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nationwide cohort study of Danish patients with AF was conducted from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016, and data were analyzed from January 1 to June 15, 2020. Data from national registries included information on all redeemed prescriptions and all hospital contacts of all patients with incident or prevalent AF (age, 18-100 years) and increased risk status, defined by a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) risk score greater than or equal to 2. Exposures: Hospital diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted proportion differences for OAT initiation and OAT prevalence, comparing individuals with and without bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Results: Patients included with incident AF (n = 147â¯810) had a mean (SD) age of 76.9 (10.1) years, 78â¯577 (53.2%) were women, 1208 (0.8%) had bipolar disorder, and 572 (0.4%) had schizophrenia. Accounting for age, sex, and calendar time, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were associated with significantly lower frequency of OAT initiation within 90 days after incident AF (bipolar disorder: -12.7%; 95% CI, -15.3% to -10.0%; schizophrenia: -24.5%; 95% CI, -28.3% to -20.7%) and lower OAT prevalence in patients with prevalent AF (bipolar disorder: -11.6%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -9.3% schizophrenia: -21.6%; 95% CI, -24.8% to -18.4%). Adjusting for socioeconomic factors and other comorbid conditions attenuated these associations, particularly for patients with bipolar disorder. However, schizophrenia continued to be associated with a with a lower rate of OAT initiation (-15.5%, 95% CI, -19.3% to -11.7%) and a -12.8% (95% CI, -15.9% to -9.7%) lower OAT prevalence. These associations were also present after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonists (adjusted proportion difference in 2013-2016: -12.4%; 95% CI, -18.7% to -6.1% for initiation and -10.1%; 95% CI, -13.8% to -6.4% for prevalence). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia were less likely to receive OAT in the setting of AF. For patients with bipolar disorder, this deficit was largely associated with socioeconomic factors and comorbidities, especially toward the end of the study period. For patients with schizophrenia, disparities in this stroke prevention therapy persistently exceeded what could be explained by other patient characteristics.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/induzido quimicamente , Comorbidade , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia/induzido quimicamente , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Background Stress has been reported to trigger stroke, and the death of a loved one is a potentially extremely stressful experience. Yet, previous studies have yielded conflicting findings of whether bereavement is associated with stroke risk, possibly because of insufficient distinction between ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We therefore examined the associations between bereavement and IS and ICH separately in contemporary care settings using nationwide high-quality register resources. Methods and Results The study cohort included all Danish individuals whose partner died between 2002 and 2016 and a reference group of cohabiting individuals matched 1:2 on sex, age, and calendar time. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and corresponding 95% CIs during up to 5 years follow-up. During the study period, 278 758 individuals experienced partner bereavement, of whom 7684 had an IS within the subsequent 5 years (aHR, 1.11; CI, 1.08-1.14 when compared with nonbereaved referents) and 1139 experienced an ICH (aHR, 1.13; CI, 1.04-1.23). For ICH, the estimated association tended to be stronger within the initial 30 days after partner death (aHR, 1.66; CI, 1.06-2.61), especially in women (aHR, 1.99; CI, 1.06-3.75), but the statistical precision was low. In absolute numbers, the cumulative incidence of IS at 30 days was 0.73 per 1000 in bereaved individuals versus 0.63 in their referents, and the corresponding figures for ICH were 0.13 versus 0.08. Conclusions Statistically significant positive associations with partner bereavement were documented for both IS and ICH risk, for ICH particularly in the short term. However, absolute risk differences were small.
Assuntos
Luto , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , AVC Isquêmico/epidemiologia , Cônjuges/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly important preventive intervention, perhaps especially in those with comorbid depression, who have a worse prognosis. However, OAT may pose particular challenges in depressed patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether AF patients with depression have lower OAT uptake. METHODS: This nationwide register-based 2005-2016 cohort study of all Danes with AF and OAT indication (CHA2DS2VASc stroke risk score ≥2) assessed OAT initiation within 90 days in those with incident AF (N=147,162) and OAT prevalence in those with prevalent AF (N=192,656). The associations of depression with both outcomes were estimated in regression analyses with successive adjustment for socioeconomic characteristics and somatic and psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Comorbid depression was significantly associated with lower frequency of OAT initiation in incident AF patients {adjusted proportion differences (aPDs): -6.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), -7.4 to -5.9]} and lower prevalence of OAT [aPD: -4.2% (95% CI, -4.7 to -3.8)] in prevalent AF patients. Yet, the OAT uptake increased substantially during the period, particularly in depressed patients [aPD for OAT prevalence in 2016: -0.8% (95% CI, -1.6 to -0.0)]. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid depression was associated with a significantly lower OAT uptake in patients with AF, which questions whether depressed patients receive sufficient support to manage this consequential cardiac condition. However, a substantial increase in the overall OAT uptake and a decrease of the depression-associated deficit in OAT were seen over the period during which OAT was developed through the introduction of new oral anticoagulation therapy.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Depressão/psicologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs following acute threatening events in approximately 12.5% of the primary care population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to advance evidence-based clinical practice and collaborative care approaches to PTSD by summarizing targeted-care guidelines. METHOD: This narrative literature review addresses important aspects of PTSD and management options, in conjunction with expert opinion when indicated. Guidelines were included if they targeted treatment of PTSD in the primary care setting or if the treatments described could be provided in the primary care setting. RESULTS: The implications regarding PTSD, comorbidities, differential diagnosis, screening tools, and treatment are presented. CONCLUSION: Primary care providers can diagnose and offer initial management of PTSD. Future research should delineate therapies helpful for complex PTSD, including group therapies, those increasing self-compassion, and other optimally effective collaborative care interventions.
Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with an increased risk of a series of cardiovascular diseases and with increased symptom burden in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to determine the association between depression as well as antidepressant treatment and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: A nationwide register-based study comparing the atrial fibrillation risk in all Danes initiating antidepressant treatment from 2000 to 2013 ( N = 785,254) with that in a 1:5-matched sample from the general population. METHODS: Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), both after initiation of treatment and in the month before when patients were assumed to have medically untreated depression. RESULTS: Antidepressant treatment was associated with a three-fold higher risk of atrial fibrillation during the first month (aHR = 3.18 (95% CI: 2.98-3.39)). This association gradually attenuated over the following year (aHR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.31-1.44) 2-6 months after antidepressant therapy initiation, and aHR = 1.11 (95% CI: 1.06-1.16) 6-12 months after). However, the associated atrial fibrillation risk was even higher in the month before starting antidepressant treatment (aHR = 7.65 (95% CI: 7.05-8.30) from 30 to 15 days before, and aHR = 4.29 (95% CI: 3.94-4.67) the last 15 days before). Overall, 0.4% of patients were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation from 30 days before to 30 days after antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant users had a substantially increased atrial fibrillation risk, particularly before treatment initiation. Whether this mirrors a causal relation between depression and atrial fibrillation may have large consequences for public health and should be discussed.
Assuntos
Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Flutter Atrial/epidemiologia , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Flutter Atrial/diagnóstico , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Critical illness survivors frequently have substantial psychiatric morbidity, including posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Prior psychiatric illness is a potent predictor of postcritical illness psychiatric morbidity. Early emotional distress and memories of frightening psychotic and nightmarish intensive care unit (ICU) experiences are risk factors for longer term psychiatric morbidity. ICU diaries may be effective in decreasing psychiatric morbidity after critical illness, though these and other interventions deserve further study.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/etiologia , Transtornos Mentais/prevenção & controle , Ansiedade/etiologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Delírio/psicologia , Depressão/etiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Personalidade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no insomnia screening tool validated in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. OBJECTIVES: To examine the validity of a single item from the PTSD checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C) to detect insomnia by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal investigation in 120 medical-surgical ICU survivors. At 1 year post-ICU, patients completed ISI, PCL-C, and Medical Short-Form 12 (SF-12) by telephone. A single PCL-C item rates difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep over the past month. We compared performance characteristics of this PCL-C item to ISI-defined insomnia (ISI ≥15). RESULTS: A score of ≥3 on the PCL-C sleep item exhibited 91% sensitivity and 67% specificity for ISI-defined insomnia (ISI ≥ 15), and it demonstrated construct validity by correlation to related QOL indices. CONCLUSIONS: A single PCL-C sleep item score ≥ 3 is a reasonable screen to identify insomnia symptoms in ICU survivors.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Estado Terminal , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:⢠Determine the prevalence of clinician-diagnosed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in primary care patients⢠Identify the prevalence of questionnaire-ascertained PTSD symptoms in primary care patients OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of clinician-diagnosed PTSD and questionnaire-ascertained PTSD symptoms in primary care patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the PRISMA method, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and relevant book chapter bibliographies. Studies that reported on the prevalence, including point or lifetime prevalence, of PTSD ascertained using diagnostic interviews or self-report questionnaires, or from administrative data, among patients seen in primary care were deemed eligible for inclusion. We abstracted data on the PTSD assessment tool, the mean questionnaire scores/cutoff scores, the time period of PTSD symptoms, and PTSD prevalence reported. RESULTS: Of 10,614 titles screened, 41 studies were eligible for inclusion. The included studies assessed PTSD in a total of 7,256,826 primary care patients. The median point prevalence of PTSD across studies was 12.5%. The median point prevalence in the civilian population was 11.1%; in the special-risk population, 12.5%; and in veterans, 24.5%. The point prevalence of diagnostic interview-ascertained PTSD ranged from 2% to 32.5%, and the point prevalence of questionnaire-based substantial PTSD symptoms ranged from 2.9% to 39.1%. Lifetime prevalence of diagnostic interview-ascertained PTSD ranged from 14.5% to 48.8%. The prevalence of PTSD in administrative data-based studies ranged from 3.5% to 29.2%. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD is common in primary care settings. Additional research on effective and generalizable interventions for PTSD in primary care is needed.
Assuntos
Entrevista Psicológica , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , PrevalênciaRESUMO
CONTEXT: Little is known about psychiatric illness and utilization of end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that preexisting psychiatric illness would increase hospital utilization at end of life among patients with chronic medical illness due to increased severity of illness and care fragmentation. METHODS: We reviewed electronic health records to identify decedents with one or more of eight chronic medical conditions based on International Classification of Diseases-9 codes. We used International Classification of Diseases-9 codes and prescription information to identify preexisting psychiatric illness. Regression models compared hospital utilization among patients with and without psychiatric illness. Path analyses examined the effect of severity of illness and care fragmentation. RESULTS: Eleven percent of 16,214 patients with medical illness had preexisting psychiatric illness, which was associated with increased risk of death in nursing homes (P = 0.002) and decreased risk of death in hospitals (P < 0.001). In the last 30 days of life, psychiatric illness was associated with reduced inpatient and intensive care unit utilization but increased emergency department utilization. Path analyses confirmed an association between psychiatric illness and increased hospital utilization mediated by severity of illness and care fragmentation, but a stronger direct effect of psychiatric illness decreasing hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our findings differ from the increased hospital utilization for patients with psychiatric illness in circumstances other than end-of-life care. Path analyses confirmed hypothesized associations between psychiatric illness and increased utilization mediated by severity of illness and care fragmentation but identified more powerful direct effects decreasing hospital use. Further investigation should examine whether this effect represents a disparity in access to preferred care.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/mortalidade , Doença Crônica/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/mortalidade , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Assistência Terminal/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are associated with an increased risk for ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC)-related hospitalizations, but it remains unknown whether this holds for individuals with nonsyndromic stress that is more prevalent in the general population. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether perceived stress is associated with ACSC-related hospitalizations and rehospitalizations, and posthospitalization 30-day mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN AND MEASURES: Population-based cohort study with 118,410 participants from the Danish National Health Survey 2010, which included data on Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, followed from 2010 to 2014, combined with individual-level national register data on hospitalizations and mortality. Multimorbidity was assessed using health register information on diagnoses and drug prescriptions within 39 condition categories. RESULTS: Being in the highest perceived stress quintile was associated with a 2.13-times higher ACSC-related hospitalization risk (95% CI, 1.91, 2.38) versus being in the lowest stress quintile after adjusting for age, sex, follow-up time, and predisposing conditions. The associated risk attenuated to 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32, 1.67) after fully adjusting for multimorbidity and socioeconomic factors. Individuals with above reference stress levels experienced 1703 excess ACSC-related hospitalizations (18% of all). A dose-response relationship was observed between perceived stress and the ACSC-related hospitalization rate regardless of multimorbidity status. Being in the highest stress quintile was associated with a 1.26-times insignificantly increased adjusted risk (95% CI, 0.79, 2.00) for ACSC rehospitalizations and a 1.43-times increased adjusted risk (95% CI, 1.13, 1.81) of mortality within 30 days of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated perceived stress levels are associated with increased risk for ACSC-related hospitalization and poor short-term prognosis.
Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although previous studies have assessed whether depression is a mortality risk factor, few have examined whether antidepressant medications (ADMs) influence mortality risk. METHODS: We estimated hazards of 1-year all-cause mortality associated with ADMs, with use occurring within 90 days of depression diagnosis among 720 821 patients who received treatment in a Veterans Health Administration facility during fiscal year 2006. We addressed treatment selection biases using conventional Cox regression, propensity-stratified Cox regression (propensity score), and 2 forms of marginal structural models. Models accounted for multiple potential clinical and demographic confounders, and sensitivity analyses compared findings by antidepressant class. RESULTS: Antidepressant medication use compared with no use was associated with significantly lower hazards of 1-year mortality risk in Cox (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.97) and propensity score estimates (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98), whereas marginal structural model-based estimates showed no difference in mortality risk when the exposure was specified as "as-treated" in every 90-day intervals of the 1-year follow-up (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.26) but showed increased risk when specified as "intent-to-treat" (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with ADMs belonging to a single class in the first 90 days, there were no significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality risks. When accounting for clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment selection bias, ADM use was associated with no excess harm.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Mortalidade , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While depression is associated with higher risk of death due to chronic medical conditions, it is unknown if depression increases mortality following serious infections. We sought to determine if pre-existing unipolar depression is associated with increased mortality within 30days after hospitalization for a serious infection. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all adults hospitalized for an infection in Denmark between 2005 and 2013. Pre-existing unipolar depression was ascertained via psychiatrist diagnoses or at least two antidepressant prescription redemptions within a six month period. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30days after infection-related hospitalization. We also studied death due to infection within 30days after admission. RESULTS: We identified 589,688 individuals who had a total of 703,158 hospitalizations for infections. After adjusting for demographics, infectious diagnosis and time since infection, socioeconomic factors and comorbidities, pre-existing unipolar depression was associated with slightly increased risk of all-cause mortality within 30days after infection-related hospitalization (Mortality Rate Ratio [MRR]: 1.07, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 1.05, 1.09). The association was strongest among persons who initiated antidepressant treatment within one year before the infection (MRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.35). Pre-existing unipolar depression was associated with increased risk of death due to sepsis (MRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.44), pneumonia (MRR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.29) and urinary tract infection (MRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.44) after adjusting for demographics, infectious diagnosis at admission and time since infection. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing unipolar depression is associated with slightly increased mortality following hospitalization for an infection.
Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/mortalidade , Transtorno Depressivo/mortalidade , Hospitalização/tendências , Mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Transmissíveis/psicologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Pneumonia/psicologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Survivors of sepsis face long-term sequelae that diminish health-related quality of life and result in increased care needs in the primary care setting, such as medication, physiotherapy, or mental health care. OBJECTIVE: To examine if a primary care-based intervention improves mental health-related quality of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2011 and December 2014, enrolling 291 patients 18 years or older who survived sepsis (including septic shock), recruited from 9 intensive care units (ICUs) across Germany. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to usual care (n = 143) or to a 12-month intervention (n = 148). Usual care was provided by their primary care physician (PCP) and included periodic contacts, referrals to specialists, and prescription of medication, other treatment, or both. The intervention additionally included PCP and patient training, case management provided by trained nurses, and clinical decision support for PCPs by consulting physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in mental health-related quality of life between ICU discharge and 6 months after ICU discharge using the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 [range, 0-100; higher ratings indicate lower impairment; minimal clinically important difference, 5 score points]). RESULTS: The mean age of the 291 patients was 61.6 years (SD, 14.4); 66.2% (n = 192) were men, and 84.4% (n = 244) required mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay (median duration of ventilation, 12 days [range, 0-134]). At 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge, 75.3% (n = 219 [112 intervention, 107 control]) and 69.4% (n = 202 [107 intervention, 95 control]), respectively, completed follow-up. Overall mortality was 13.7% at 6 months (40 deaths [21 intervention, 19 control]) and 18.2% at 12 months (53 deaths [27 intervention, 26 control]). Among patients in the intervention group, 104 (70.3%) received the intervention at high levels of integrity. There was no significant difference in change of mean MCS scores (intervention group mean at baseline, 49.1; at 6 months, 52.9; change, 3.79 score points [95% CI, 1.05 to 6.54] vs control group mean at baseline, 49.3; at 6 months, 51.0; change, 1.64 score points [95% CI, -1.22 to 4.51]; mean treatment effect, 2.15 [95% CI, -1.79 to 6.09]; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among survivors of sepsis and septic shock, the use of a primary care-focused team-based intervention, compared with usual care, did not improve mental health-related quality of life 6 months after ICU discharge. Further research is needed to determine if modified approaches to primary care management may be more effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN61744782.
Assuntos
Administração de Caso , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Saúde Mental , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Sepse/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Sepse/reabilitação , SobreviventesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) and early rehospitalizations increase health care costs. OBJECTIVES: To determine if individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) (eg, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) are at increased risk for hospitalizations for ACSCs, and rehospitalization for the same or another ACSC, within 30 days. RESEARCH DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5.9 million Danish persons aged 18 years and older between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2013. MEASURES: The Danish Psychiatric Central Register provided information on SMI diagnoses and the Danish National Patient Register on hospitalizations for ACSCs and 30-day rehospitalizations. RESULTS: SMI was associated with increased risk for having any ACSC-related hospitalization after adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and prior primary care utilization [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.37-1.45]. Among individual ACSCs, SMI was associated with increased risk for hospitalizations for angina (IRR: 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04-1.25), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma exacerbation (IRR: 1.87; 95% CI, 1.74-2.00), congestive heart failure exacerbation (IRR: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16-1.35), and diabetes (IRR: 1.43; 95% CI, 1.31-1.57), appendiceal perforation (IRR: 1.49; 95% CI, 1.30-1.71), pneumonia (IRR: 1.72; 95% CI, 1.66-1.79), and urinary tract infection (IRR: 1.70; 95% CI, 1.62-1.78). SMI was also associated with increased risk for rehospitalization within 30 days for the same (IRR: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.40) or for another ACSC (IRR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.49-1.76). CONCLUSION: Persons with SMI are at increased risk for hospitalizations for ACSCs, and after discharge, are at increased risk for rehospitalizations for ACSCs within 30 days.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/terapia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hospitalisations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs), a group of chronic and acute illnesses considered not to require inpatient treatment if timely and appropriate ambulatory care is received, and early rehospitalisations are common and costly. We sought to determine whether individuals with depression are at increased risk of hospitalisations for ACSCs, and rehospitalisation for the same or another ACSC, within 30 days. DESIGN: National, population-based cohort study. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 5,049,353 individuals ≥ 18 years of age between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Depression was ascertained via psychiatrist diagnoses in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register or antidepressant prescription redemption from the Danish National Prescription Registry. Hospitalisations for ACSCs and rehospitalisations within 30 days were identified using the Danish National Patient Register. RESULTS: Overall, individuals with depression were 2.35 times more likely to be hospitalised for an ACSC (95% CI 2.32 to 2.37) versus those without depression after adjusting for age, sex and calendar period, and 1.45 times more likely after adjusting for socioeconomic factors, comorbidities and primary care utilisation (95% CI 1.43 to 1.46). After adjusting for ACSC-predisposing comorbidity, depression was associated with significantly greater risk of hospitalisations for all chronic (eg, angina, diabetes complications, congestive heart failure exacerbation) and acute ACSCs (eg, pneumonia) compared to those without depression. Compared to those without depression, persons with depression were 1.21 times more likely to be rehospitalised within 30 days for the same ACSC (95% CI 1.18 to 1.24) and 1.19 times more likely to be rehospitalised within 30 days for a different ACSC (95% CI 1.15 to 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with depression are at increased risk of hospitalisations for ACSCs, and once discharged are at elevated risk of rehospitalisations within 30 days for ACSCs.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Depressão/complicações , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dinamarca , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Although schizophrenia is associated with several age-related disorders and considerable cognitive impairment, it remains unclear whether the risk of dementia is higher among persons with schizophrenia compared with those without schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of dementia among persons with schizophrenia compared with those without schizophrenia in a large nationwide cohort study with up to 18 years of follow-up, taking age and established risk factors for dementia into account. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study of more than 2.8 million persons aged 50 years or older used individual data from 6 nationwide registers in Denmark. A total of 20â¯683 individuals had schizophrenia. Follow-up started on January 1, 1995, and ended on January 1, 2013. Analysis was conducted from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs) of dementia for persons with schizophrenia compared with persons without schizophrenia. RESULTS: During 18 years of follow-up, 136â¯012 individuals, including 944 individuals with a history of schizophrenia, developed dementia. Schizophrenia was associated with a more than 2-fold higher risk of all-cause dementia (IRR, 2.13; 95% CI, 2.00-2.27) after adjusting for age, sex, and calendar period. The estimates (reported as IRR; 95% CI) did not change substantially when adjusting for medical comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus (2.01; 1.89-2.15) but decreased slightly when adjusting for substance abuse (1.71; 1.60-1.82). The association between schizophrenia and dementia risk was stable when evaluated in subgroups characterized by demographics and comorbidities, although the IRR was higher among individuals younger than 65 years (3.77; 3.29-4.33), men (2.38; 2.13-2.66), individuals living with a partner (3.16; 2.71-3.69), those without cerebrovascular disease (2.23; 2.08-2.39), and those without substance abuse (1.96; 1.82-2.11). The CIPs (95% CIs) of developing dementia by the age of 65 years were 1.8% (1.5%-2.2%) for persons with schizophrenia and 0.6% (0.6%-0.7%) for persons without schizophrenia. The respective CIPs for persons with and without schizophrenia were 7.4% (6.8%-8.1%) and 5.8% (5.8%-5.9%) by the age of 80 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Individuals with schizophrenia, especially those younger than 65 years, had a markedly increased relative risk of dementia that could not be explained by established dementia risk factors.
Assuntos
Demência/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RiscoRESUMO
This special article pays tribute to Wayne Katon, MD (1950-2015) with a Gedenkschrift, or review, of his prolific academic career. Abstracts of all of Dr. Katon's Medline citations were reviewed to develop a narrative of his seminal epidemiological and interventional research findings. Specifically, we describe: (a) how Dr. Katon's clinical work and observational epidemiology and health services research informed and guided interventional studies; (b) the evolution of multidisciplinary interventional trials from primary care-based psychiatric consultation to primary care-based collaborative care for depression to multicondition collaborative care; and (c) how Dr. Katon's research has informed the work of other leading researchers in the field of psychosomatic medicine and helped develop a new generation of researchers at the interface of psychiatry and primary care. For more than three decades, Dr. Katon led a multidisciplinary research team that conducted seminal epidemiological studies and randomized trials and that influenced the thinking and research in the field of psychiatry in a number of areas: (a) the importance and impact of mental disorders presenting in primary care settings and (b) the organization of effective multidisciplinary care for primary care patients with common mental disorders and comorbid medical conditions. Dr. Katon's work revolutionized the care of psychiatric illnesses in primary care and other medical care settings to the benefit of countless patients worldwide.