Development and investigation of a non-invasive disease severity index for inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: The disease severity index (DSI) encapsulates the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) burden but requires endoscopic investigations. This study developed a non-invasive DSI using faecal calprotectin (DSI-fCal) and faecal myeloperoxidase (DSI-fMPO) instead of colonoscopy. METHODS: Adults with IBD were recruited prospectively. Baseline biomarker concentrations were used to develop DSI-fCal and DSI-fMPO, and these were correlated with the original DSI, IBD-symptoms, endoscopic activity, and quality-of-life (QoL). Area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUROC) assessed DSI-fCal/DSI-fMPO as predictors of clinical and biochemical remission at six months (symptom remission and fCal <150 µg/g, respectively), and a complicated IBD-course at 24 months (disease relapse needing escalation of biologicals/immunomodulators/recurrent corticosteroids, IBD-hospitalisations/surgeries). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the utility of DSI-fCal/DSI-fMPO in predicting a complicated IBD-course at 24 months. RESULTS: In total, 171 patients were included (Crohn's disease=99, female=90, median age=46y (IQR 36-59)). DSI-fCal and DSI-fMPO correlated with the original DSI (r>0.9, p<0.001), endoscopic indices (r=0.45-0.49, p<0.001), IBD-symptoms (r=0.53-0.58, p<0.001) and QoL (r=-0.57-0.58, p<0.001). Baseline DSI-fCal (AUROC=0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.92) and DSI-fMPO (AUROC=0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.93) were associated with 6-month clinical and biochemical remission. DSI-fCal (AUROC=0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and DSI-fMPO (AUROC=0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) performed similarly in predicting a complicated IBD-course to the original DSI (pdifference>0.05). The non-invasive DSI was independently associated with a complicated IBD-course on multivariable analyses (DSI-fCal28, aOR=6.04, 95% CI 2.42-15.08; DSI-fMPO25, aOR=7.84, 95% CI 2.96-20.73). CONCLUSIONS: The DSI-fCal and DSI-fMPO perform similarly in prognosticating the longitudinal disease course as the original DSI, whilst avoiding a need for an endoscopic assessment.

Parent Perspectives of Diagnostic and Monitoring Tests Undertaken by Their Child with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

PURPOSE: To assess parent perspectives of the current and potential future tests for their child with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: New Zealand parents of a child with IBD were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Experiences relating to their child's blood or faecal tests, medical imaging (abdominal ultrasound [US], abdominal computerised tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance enterography) and colonoscopy were collected. Perceived attitudes to potential future testing of urine, saliva, and breath, were sought. RESULTS: Twenty-eight parents, 93% female completed the survey, and 86% were aged between 35 and 54 years. Baseline information was provided by parents for 27 of 28 children, 70.3% had Crohn's disease with a mean disease duration of 2.67 years. Blood tests were the most requested and completed tests, while CT was the least ordered and most refused test. Colonoscopy was rated as the least comfortable and generated the most worry. Explanation of test significantly improved parent's levels of understanding when their child had blood, faecal, imaging (US) or colonoscopy tests. Providing an explanation, test invasiveness and the impact of the blood results may have on their child's treatment significantly improved parents' comfort levels. However, explanation of colonoscopy generated a significant parental concerns. Saliva, urine and blood tests were chosen as the most preferred disease monitoring tests. CONCLUSION: Parents preferred any tests less invasive than colonoscopy for monitoring their child's IBD. Although providing explanation of their child's tests enhanced parents' understanding, it can also affect parents' levels of concern and comfort.