Femoral Neurogram Before Transpsoas Spinal Access at L4-5 Intervertebral Disk Space: A Proposed Screening Tool.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the variability of the course of the femoral nerve across the L4-5 disk space, and to present a novel application of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) in the visualization of femoral nerve roots. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A concern regarding the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach is the proximity of the lumbar plexus. Current techniques of assessing the proximity of neural tissue to the L4-5 disk space have limited capabilities. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were selected for L4-5 TFESI (L4 selective nerve root blocks) because of lumbar radiculopathy. L4 neurograms were obtained while performing L4-5 TFESI under flouroscopic guidance, using a retroneural technique. The course of the L4 root/femoral nerve was then evaluated under fluoroscopy in the anteroposterior and lateral planes. Images were then reviewed by a radiologist, physiatrist, and 2 orthopedic spine surgeons. RESULTS: Fluoroscopic evaluation revealed that the pattern of location of the femoral nerve was highly variable. In males, it was located 4.7% in zone 2, 32.5% in zone 3, 53.5% in zone 4, and 9.3% in zone P. In female patients, it was located 7.0% in zone 2, 14% in zone 3, 54.4% in zone 4, and 24.6% in zone P. CONCLUSIONS: An L4 neurogram will provide an accurate trajectory of L4 root/femoral nerve as it crosses the L4-5 intervertebral disk space. An accurate assessment is essential to help minimize the increasing frequency of thigh pain, paresthesias, and weakness associated with the lateral access to the L4-5 intervertebral disk space. Femoral nerves that fall within zones 2 and 3 will require more manipulation during retraction and may be better suited with a different surgical approach.

Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of repeated surgical lengthenings and time on spinal growth and Cobb angle in children with early onset scoliosis and dual growing rods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have established the effectiveness of dual growing rods for controlling spinal deformity and promoting spinal "growth." Although anecdotal experience suggests that the effectiveness of repeated lengthenings decreases over time, this has not been previously studied. METHODS: Medical records from five different centers were reviewed to identify children treated with dual growing rods for early onset scoliosis who had a minimum of 2-year follow-up and at least three lengthening procedures. Initial radiographs, postimplantation radiographs, and radiographs from before and after each lengthening were measured for T1-S1 distance and Cobb angle. Linear regression and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients from five centers met the inclusion criteria. The average age of our patients was 5.7 years (range 1.7-8.9 years); mean follow-up was 3.3 years (range 2-7 years). The average interval between lengthenings was 6.8 months. Cobb angle decreased from a mean value of 74° preoperatively to 36° after the primary implantation and did not change significantly with repeated lengthenings (P = 0.96). After initial implantation, the average annual T1-S1 gain was 1.76 ± 0.71 cm/year. The T1-S1 gain after a given lengthening, however, decreased significantly with repeated lengthenings (P = 0.007). When the effect of time was considered, there was also a significant decrease in T1-S1 gain over time (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: There seems to be a "law of diminishing returns" with repeated lengthenings of dual growing rods. Repeated lengthenings still result in a net T1-S1 increase; however, this gain tends to decrease with each subsequent lengthening and over time. This phenomenon may be due to autofusion of the spine from prolonged immobilization by a rigid device.

Anatomy of the percutaneous presacral space for a novel fusion technique.

OBJECTIVES: Lumbar fusion has been widely used to treat unstable spinal disorders. Methods are evolving from open procedures to less invasive methods to avoid soft tissue trauma. Recently, a soft tissue sparing method to access the axial lumbosacral spine has been developed. It is crucial to determine structures potentially at risk for injury during this fusion technique. The anatomy of the presacral space and safety of the paracoccygeal approach were evaluated through cadaveric dissection and radiographic studies. The objective was to evaluate the safety of a paracoccygeal approach to the axial lumbosacral spine and determine structures that could potentially be injured. METHODS: The paracoccygeal approach was performed on two cadavers, followed by dissection. Distances from the midline trajectory of the approach to surrounding vascular structures were determined. Similar distances were also measured on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 12 patients, as well as CT images of two additional patients. A "safe zone" was determined using the sagittal length of the presacral space and the distance between the most medial internal iliac vessel on the right and left, respectively. RESULTS: The coronal safe zone averaged 6.9 and 6.0 cm on MRI and CT, respectively. The mean distance from the anterior sacral margin to the rectum at the S3-S4 level was 1.2 and 1.3 cm on MRI and CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, we defined the "coronal safe zone" within the presacral space. This "safe zone" may guide surgeons when utilizing the percutaneous paracoccygeal approach.