Delays in Initiating Anti-Cancer Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer-How Slow Can We Go?

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. When diagnosed at an early stage, appropriate and timely treatment results in a high cure rate and better quality of life. Delays in initiating anti-cancer therapy, including surgical resection, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are commonly encountered, even in developed health care systems. Existing comorbidities that mandate referral to other services, genetic counseling and testing that may dictate the extent and type of anti-cancer therapy and insurance coverage, are among the most commonly cited factors. However, delays can be unavoidable; for over three years, health care systems across the globe were busy dealing with the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. War across hot zones around the globe resulted in millions of refugees; most of them have no access to cancer care, and when/where available, there may be significant delays. Thus, cancer patients across the globe will probably continue to suffer from significant delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Many retrospective reports showed significant negative impacts on different aspects of treatment outcomes and on patients' psychosocial wellbeing and productivity. In this paper, we review the available data on the impact of delays in initiating appropriate treatment on the outcomes of patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in the Middle East.

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast cancer (MetBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. We evaluated the impact of clinicopathological characteristics and treatment modalities on outcomes among MetBC patients treated at our center. METHODS: Women with stage I-III MetBC were reviewed from our database from 2005-2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate locoregional-failure-free survival (LRFFS), overall-survival (OS) and distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS). We assessed associations with survival outcomes by log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of LRFFS, OS and DMFS. RESULTS: 81 patients were eligible for the study. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years. 90.1% had G-III tumors, 64.2% were pathologically node negative and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) was absent in 72.8%. 67.8% were triple negative, and 7.4% were HER2-neu positive. Most (66.7%) patients underwent mastectomy. Free margins were achieved in the entire cohort, however, 17.3% had close margin (<2 mm). Almost all patients received chemotherapy. 75.3% received radiotherapy, 23.5% received hormonal therapy and 6.2% received Trastuzumab. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 18.5% developed loco-regional recurrence and 34.6% relapsed distally. Five-year OS was 66.0%. On multivariate analysis: adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with better OS (P < .0001), and tumor size >5 cm, nodal involvement and LVI correlated with worse OS, (P = .019, P = .021, P = .028, respectively). There were no survival differences with respect to age, triple negativity, and morphologic subtype. CONCLUSION: We report the largest single institutional series on MetBC in the Middle East region. MetBC confers worse survival outcomes, and more aggressive local and systemic treatment strategies should be investigated.

Factors influencing the use of adaptive radiation therapy in vulvar carcinoma.

AIM: We aim to evaluate the variables affecting the frequency of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in vulvar cancer. BACKGROUND: ART may be needed throughout a definitive RT course for vulvar carcinoma due to changes in patient's anatomy and tumor response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of patients charts who had been treated with definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for vulvar carcinoma, between January 2015 and December 2019 were inquired. Radiation therapy was delivered using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). ART was defined as re-simulation and re-planning based on deformation in the irradiated volume by more than 1 cm. Univariate analysis was conducted to study the impact of patient's demographics as well as tumor characteristics on the frequency of ART. RESULTS: 22 patients were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 43-82). Radiotherapy dose was 60-66 Gy over 30-35 fractions (fx). Median primary tumor volume was 30cc (9-140). Median Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32 (range 21-40). Thirteen out of 22 patients (59%) required ART, with median timing at 25 fx (19-31). On univariate analysis, larger primary tumor volume (> = 30cc) was associated significantly with increased frequency of ART (p value = 0.0005). There was no significant impact of ART on the frequency with respect to patient's age, BMI, tumor stage, grade and location. CONCLUSION: Changes in radiation target volume are common among vulvar carcinoma patients who are treated with definitive radiotherapy, especially large primary tumors. This review highlights the importance of ART for patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Undifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma, an Immunohistochemical Study Including PD-L1 Testing of a Series of Cases From a Single Cancer Center.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC) is a rare and poorly recognized entity, associated with a poor outcome. The clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical features of 17 cases diagnosed at our center are described. The median age was 60 yr. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (76.9%). Most patients presented with advanced stage (64.7%). Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was the commonly offered surgical treatment (80.0%). Nine (52.9%) patients received adjuvant treatment. The median overall survival was 11 mo. Pure UEC was seen in 8 cases (47.0%), while dedifferentiated carcinoma in 5 cases (29.4%). The epithelial component was part of carcinosarcoma or was mixed with serous carcinoma in 2 cases (11.8%) each. Positivity for one or more of the cytokeratin cocktails, mostly as strong focal staining, was evident in 16 cases (94.1%). PAX-8 was negative in 13 cases (86.7%). BRG-1/SMARCA4 was lost in 3 cases (20.0%). Eleven cases (64.7%) were MLH1/PMS2 deficient. Ten cases (66.7%) were positive for programmed death ligand 1, with positivity in 10%, 20%, and 100% of tumor cells detected in a single case each. Only 2 of 11 (18.2%) referral cases were correctly diagnosed as UEC. UEC is a rare tumor that is frequently misdiagnosed. A panel of immunostains is necessary to make the correct diagnosis. The range of positivity for programmed death ligand 1 testing suggests that immunotherapy might be considered in the adjuvant setting, especially with the poor response of this tumor to traditional therapies.

Combined photon-electron beams in the treatment of the supraclavicular lymph nodes in breast cancer: A novel technique that achieves adequate coverage while reducing lung dose.

Radiation pneumonitis is a well-documented side effect of radiation therapy for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare combined photon-electron, photon-only, and electron-only plans in the radiation treatment of the supraclavicular lymph nodes. In total, 13 patients requiring chest wall and supraclavicular nodal irradiation were planned retrospectively using combined photon-electron, photon-only, and electron-only supraclavicular beams. A dose of 50Gy over 25 fractions was prescribed. Chest wall irradiation parameters were fixed for all plans. The goal of this planning effort was to cover 95% of the supraclavicular clinical target volume (CTV) with 95% of the prescribed dose and to minimize the volume receiving ≥ 105% of the dose. Comparative end points were supraclavicular CTV coverage (volume covered by the 95% isodose line), hotspot volume, maximum radiation dose, contralateral breast dose, mean total lung dose, total lung volume percentage receiving at least 20 Gy (V(20 Gy)), heart volume percentage receiving at least 25 Gy (V(25 Gy)). Electron and photon energies ranged from 8 to 18 MeV and 4 to 6 MV, respectively. The ratio of photon-to-electron fractions in combined beams ranged from 5:20 to 15:10. Supraclavicular nodal coverage was highest in photon-only (mean = 96.2 ± 3.5%) followed closely by combined photon-electron (mean = 94.2 ± 2.5%) and lowest in electron-only plans (mean = 81.7 ± 14.8%, p < 0.001). The volume of tissue receiving ≥ 105% of the prescription dose was higher in the electron-only (mean = 69.7 ± 56.1 cm(3)) as opposed to combined photon-electron (mean = 50.8 ± 40.9 cm(3)) and photon-only beams (mean = 32.2 ± 28.1 cm(3), p = 0.114). Heart V(25 Gy) was not statistically different among the plans (p = 0.999). Total lung V(20 Gy) was lowest in electron-only (mean = 10.9 ± 2.3%) followed by combined photon-electron (mean = 13.8 ± 2.3%) and highest in photon-only plans (mean = 16.2 ± 3%, p < 0.001). As expected, photon-only plans demonstrated the highest target coverage and total lung V(20 Gy). The superiority of electron-only beams, in terms of decreasing lung dose, is set back by the dosimetric hotspots associated with such plans. Combined photon-electron treatment is a feasible technique for supraclavicular nodal irradiation and results in adequate target coverage, acceptable dosimetric hotspot volume, and slightly reduced lung dose.