Papillary tumor of the pineal region: analysis of DNA methylation profiles and clinical outcomes in 76 cases.

Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is an uncommon tumor of the pineal region with distinctive histopathologic and molecular characteristics. Experience is limited with respect to its molecular heterogeneity and clinical characteristics. Here, we describe 39 new cases and combine these with 37 previously published cases for a cohort of 76 PTPR's, all confirmed by methylation profiling. As previously reported, two main methylation groups were identified (PTPR-A and PTPR-B). In our analysis we extended the subtyping into three subtypes: PTPR-A, PTPR-B1 and PTPR-B2 supported by DNA methylation profile and genomic copy number variations. Frequent loss of chromosome 3 or 14 was found in PTPR-B1 tumors but not in PTPR-B2. Examination of clinical outcome showed that nearly half (14/30, 47%) of examined patients experienced tumor progression with significant difference among the subtypes (p value = 0.046). Our analysis extends the understanding of this uncommon but distinct neuroepithelial tumor by describing its molecular heterogeneity and clinical outcomes, including its tendency towards tumor recurrence.

Molecular and clinicopathologic characteristics of CNS embryonal tumors with BRD4::LEUTX fusion.

Central nervous system (CNS) embryonal tumors are a heterogeneous group of high-grade malignancies, and the increasing clinical use of methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of molecularly distinct subtypes. One proposed tumor type, CNS tumor with BRD4::LEUTX fusion, has been described. As only a few CNS tumors with BRD4::LEUTX fusions have been described, we herein characterize a cohort of 9 such cases (4 new, 5 previously published) to further describe their clinicopathologic and molecular features. We demonstrate that CNS embryonal tumor with BRD4::LEUTX fusion comprises a well-defined methylation class/cluster. We find that patients are young (4 years or younger), with large tumors at variable locations, and frequently with evidence of leptomeningeal/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination. Histologically, tumors were highly cellular with high-grade embryonal features. Immunohistochemically, 5/5 cases showed synaptophysin and 4/5 showed OLIG2 expression, thus overlapping with CNS neuroblastoma, FOXR2-activated. DNA copy number profiles were generally flat; however, two tumors had chromosome 1q gains. No recurring genomic changes, besides the presence of the fusion, were found. The LEUTX portion of the fusion transcript was constant in all cases assessed, while the BRD4 portion varied but included a domain with proto-oncogenic activity in all cases. Two patients with clinical follow up available had tumors with excellent response to chemotherapy. Two of our patients were alive without evidence of recurrence or progression after gross total resection and chemotherapy at 16 and 33 months. One patient relapsed, and the last of our four patients died of disease one month after diagnosis. Overall, this case series provides additional evidence for this as a distinct tumor type defined by the presence of a specific fusion as well as a distinct DNA methylation signature. Studies on larger series are required to further characterize these tumors.

Immune cell gene expression signatures in diffuse glioma are associated with IDH mutation status, patient outcome and malignant cell state, and highlight the importance of specific cell subsets in glioma biology.

The tumor micro-environment (TME) plays an important role in various cancers, including gliomas. We estimated immune cell type-specific gene expression profiles in 3 large clinically annotated glioma datasets using CIBERSORTx and LM22/LM10 blood-based immune signatures and found that the proportions and estimated gene expression patterns of specific immune cells significantly varied according to IDH mutation status. When IDH-WT and IDH-MUT tumors were considered separately, cluster-of-cluster analyses of immune cell gene expression identified groups with distinct survival outcomes. We confirmed and extended these findings by applying a signature matrix derived from single-cell RNA-sequencing data derived from 19 glioma tumor samples to the bulk profiling data, validating findings from the LM22/LM10 results. To link immune cell signatures with outcomes in checkpoint therapy, we then showed a significant association of monocytic lineage cell gene expression clusters with patient survival and with mesenchymal gene expression scores. Integrating immune cell-based gene expression with previously described malignant cell states in glioma demonstrated that macrophage M0 abundance significantly correlated with mesenchymal state in IDH-WT gliomas, with evidence of a previously implicated role of the Oncostatin-M receptor and macrophages in the mesenchymal state. Among IDH-WT tumors that were enriched for the mesenchymal cell state, the estimated M0 macrophage expression signature coordinately also trended to a mesenchymal signature. We also examined IDH-MUT tumors stratified by 1p/19q status, showing that a mesenchymal gene expression signature the M0 macrophage fraction was enriched in IDH-MUT, non-codeleted tumors. Overall, these results highlight the biological and clinical significance of the immune cell environment related to IDH mutation status, patient prognosis and the mesenchymal state in diffuse gliomas.