Obstetric neuraxial anesthesia at low platelet counts in the context of immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune condition affecting women of childbearing age that is characterized by diminished platelet quantity with preserved function. Although pregnant women with ITP are often denied obstetric neuraxial anesthesia (OBNA) with low platelet counts for fear of neuraxial hematoma, the true magnitude of neuraxial hematoma for ITP parturients is unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine OBNA outcomes in ITP parturients with platelet counts below 100 x 109·L-1. SOURCE: Articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and PubMed in process until May 14, 2018 were searched. Two reviewers independently screened 954 articles by title and abstract, reviewed 62 full-texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for 26 articles. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 291 pregnant women with ITP and platelet counts below 100 x 109·L-1, 166 received OBNA and 61 of these had platelet counts below 80 x 109·L-1. No neuraxial hematomas were reported. Meta-analysis of six studies showed higher platelet counts in those with OBNA than without (mean difference [MD], 19 x 109·L-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11 to 26; P < 0.001), with no difference between epidural and spinal anesthesia (MD, 0.4 x 109·L-1; 95% CI, -4 to 4; P = 0.86). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights continued reluctance to offer OBNA below the commonly quoted 80 x 109·L-1 platelet count, based largely on consensus and theoretical presumption of risk. This further negatively influences the accrual of large-scale data. The evidence of no neuraxial hematoma after OBNA provided herein offers support for considering neuraxial anesthesia at lower platelet count thresholds. Each patient should be afforded individualized discussion of risk and benefit relative to other analgesic measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42018059220); registered 2 August, 2018.

Corticosteroids compared with intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy.

Treatment options for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy are limited, and evidence to guide management decisions is lacking. This retrospective study of singleton pregnancies from 2 tertiary centers compared the effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and corticosteroids in treatment of ITP. Data from 195 women who had 235 pregnancies were reviewed. Treatment was not required in 137 pregnancies (58%). Of the remaining 98 pregnancies in 91 women, 47 (48%) were treated with IVIg and 51 were treated with corticosteroids as the initial intervention. Mean maternal platelet count at birth did not differ between groups (IVIg 69 × 10(9)/L vs corticosteroids 77 × 10(9)/L; P = .71) nor did the proportion of mothers who achieved a platelet count response (IVIg 38% vs corticosteroids 39%; P = .85). There were no fatal or severe maternal, fetal, or neonatal hemorrhages. Of 203 neonates in whom platelet counts were available, 56 (28%) had a birth platelet count <150 × 10(9)/L and 18 (9%) had platelet counts <50 × 10(9)/L. Nadir platelet counts for most affected neonates occurred at birth, although for some neonates, nadir platelet counts occurred up to 6 days postnatally. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 2 neonates (nadir platelet counts were 135 and 18 × 10(9)/L). There were no neonatal deaths. The majority of pregnant women with a history of ITP did not require treatment, and neonatal outcomes were comparable for mothers who received IVIg or corticosteroids for treatment of maternal ITP.