Reliability of S.A.R.A. (sterilization and reimplantation autograft) technique in long bone open fractures.

The reimplantation of small or large extruded bone segments is one of the most complex clinical management scenarios in the treatment of open fractures. No consensus exists regarding the efficiency of this technique. The aim of the study was to analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of Sterilization and Reimplantation Autograft (S.A.R.A.) technique in open fractures. Therefore, fifteen skeletally mature patients with Gustilo-Anderson -IIIB type fractures treated with autograft reimplantation, were included in this study. The sample size was divided in two groups: patients with a loss of small segments (Group A - less than 5 cm) and those with large segments (Group B - greater than 5 cm). Eight patients belonged to Group A and seven to Group B. The treatment of contaminated bone may be performed by the following protocols: saline rinse, povidone-iodine scrub and saline rinse, retain periosteum, immersion in antibiotic solution (clindamycin and gentamicin and metronidazole), washing with physiological solution, acute reimplantation in Group A or reimplantation after 21 days in Group B after a bone freezing at -80°C. The Radiographic Union Score (RUS), pain visual analogic score (VAS), patient satisfaction and return to work were assessed at a mean follow-up of 24 months. No cases of superficial or deep infection were reported at 2-year follow-up. The fractures achieved a complete union in 14 patients; one patient belonging to Group A had a malabsorption of the replanted bone. Furthermore, povidone-iodine scrub, antibiotic solution immersion, and washing with physiological solution preserved the articular surface morphology. This study suggests that reimplantation of extruded short or long segments may represent a reliable alternative to amputation in open long bone fractures. Further studies are needed to define the most efficient technique for sterilizing the bone autograft to reduce the complication rate.

Unlocked versus dynamic and static distal locked femoral nails in stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Few clinical studies have analyzed the utility of distal interlocking screws in stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with intramedullary devices. We performed a prospective analysis comparing short unlocked versus short dynamic and short static distal locked intramedullary nails. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine level-II trauma centres were involved in the study. 240 patients over the age of 65 with a stable (AO/OTA 31-A1) or unstable intertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA 31-A2) were prospectively investigated. The same type of nail was used in every patient. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the type of distal locking used. Intra-operative variables were examined and patients were followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively. All complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients completed 1 year of follow-up visits. In the Unlocking Group (UG) the operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, total length of incision were significantly decreased compared to both the Dynamic Group (DG) and the Static Group (SG) (p < 0.05). Conversely, no reliable differences in intraoperative variables were noted between the Dynamic Group and the Static Group (p > 0.05). In terms of time of fracture union we found no differences among the three Groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, no cases of limb shortening >1 cm or varus collapse were detected in any group. The 3 Groups were similar in terms of HHS, SF-12 and Barthel index results at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Finally, no significant differences were demonstrated across the three Groups in terms of major complications. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study further confirms the hypothesis that short intramedullary nails do not need to be locked for stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures.