Are all left bundle branch blocks the same? Myocardial mechanical implications by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is usually associated with structural myocardial diseases progressively leading to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We sought to determine the mechanical implications of LBBB (as defined based on Strauss' criteria) by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR). METHOD AND RESULTS: We included consecutive patients referred to CMR to assess the structural cause of LBBB. CMR scans consisted of cine, stress perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Myocardial deformation was assessed by tissue tracking analysis; LGE was quantified using the full width at half maximum method. We included 86 patients [63% male, 70 years (60-72)] with mean QRS duration 150 ± 13 msec. A structural disease was identified on CMR in 53% of patients (ischemic heart disease, IHD, 31%; non-ischemic heart disease, NIHD, 22%), while LBBB-related septal dyssynchrony (SD) was the only abnormality in 47%. LGE was found in 42% of patients. LVEF and myocardial deformation were impaired. Despite similar ECG characteristics, myocardial strain differed significantly between IHD, NIHD and SD patients, and patients with SD showed less impaired myocardial deformation. Indexed LV end-systolic volume and LGE extent were independently associated with impaired strain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LBBB show different structural and mechanical properties, and LGE extent has an unfavourable effect on myocardial mechanics.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) mimics: the knot unravelled by cardiovascular MRI.

AIM: To assess the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in patients referred for suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), its ability to identify ARVC mimics, and subsequent clinical impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CMRI registry of the year 2014 was analysed to identify all consecutive patients referred for suspected ARVC. A comprehensive CMRI protocol that included anatomy, bi-ventricular function modules, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Out of 2,481 CMRI performed, 124 patients (5%) were referred for suspected ARVC. A pathological substrate was identified at CMRI in 36 patients (29%): five patients (4%) had ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and 10 (8%) non-IHD; five patients (4%) met CMRI criteria for ARVC and 16 (13%) were ARVC mimics. right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and right ventricular stroke volume (RVSV) were significantly higher in patients with ARVC mimics (RVEDV p=0.007, RVSV p=0.012) and ARVC (RVEDV p=0.013, RVSV p=0.013), as compared to those with structurally normal hearts. CMRI was superior to echocardiography in the identification of ARVC mimics (13% versus 1%, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CMRI was able to identify 16 (13%) ARVC mimics, from congenital abnormalities to acquired heart disease. CMRI was superior in identifying ARVC mimics compared to echocardiography, and overall provided a change in diagnosis in 22% of patients.

Diagnostic yield of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in young-middle aged patients with high-grade atrio-ventricular block.

BACKGROUND: Atrio-ventricular block (AVB) is a rare finding in young or middle-aged adults, often leading to pacemaker implantation (PM) without further investigation. We sought to assess the diagnostic role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in young and middle-aged adults with high-grade AVB. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled young-middle aged (18-65years) patients with high grade AVB referred to CMR after standard clinical assessment (history, electrocardiogram and cardiac rhythm monitoring) prior to PM implantation. Cine and post-contrast imaging were performed in a 1.5T scanner. RESULTS: 34 patients (59% male, mean age 42±12years) with high grade AVB were referred to CMR for suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD)(n=4) and non-ischemic heart disease (NIHD)(n=20); no clear cause was found in 9 patients prior to CMR and 1 patient had suspected lung disease. A pathologic substrate was found on CMR in 15 patients (44%), while a structurally normal heart was reported in 18 (53%). Non-specific findings were reported in 1 patient (3%). There was a fair agreement between CMR and echocardiographic findings (Cohen's kappa 0.243), and CMR provided an entirely new diagnosis in 34% of patients. As compared to the standard clinical assessment, CMR had an additional role in 65% of patients and guided further testing (genetic testing, extra-cardiac imaging) in 9%. CONCLUSIONS: CMR found a pathologic substrate in 44% of patients, mainly NIHD (32%). Half of the patients (53%) had a structurally normal heart. When added to the standard clinical assessment, CMR had an incremental diagnostic role in two thirds of patients.

Out of hospital cardiac arrest survivors with inconclusive coronary angiogram: Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on clinical management and decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is the leading cause of death worldwide, mainly due to acute coronary syndromes. Urgent coronary angiography with view to revascularisation is recommended in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Diagnosis and management of patients with inconclusive coronary angiogram (unobstructed coronaries or unidentified culprit lesion) is challenging. We sought to assess the role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) in the diagnosis and management of OHCA survivors with an inconclusive coronary angiogram. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective multicentre CMR registry analysis of OHCA survivors with an inconclusive angiogram. Clinical, ECG and multi-modality imaging data were analysed. Clinical impact of CMR was defined as a change in diagnosis or management. Out of 174 OHCA survivors referred for CMR, 110 patients (63%, 84 male, median age 58) had an inconclusive angiogram. CMR identified a pathologic substrate in 76/110 patients (69%): ischemic heart disease was found in 45 (41%) and non-ischemic heart disease in 31 (28%). A structurally normal heart was found in 25 patients (23%) and non-specific findings in 9 (8%). As compared to trans-thoracic echocardiogram, CMR proved to be superior in identifying a pathologic substrate (69% vs 54%, p=0.018). The CMR study carried a clinical impact in 70% of patients, determining a change in diagnosis in 25%, in management in 29% and a change in both in 16%. CONCLUSIONS: CMR showed a promising role in the diagnostic work-up of OHCA survivors with inconclusive angiogram and its wider use should be considered.