Cholangiocarcinoma, sequential chemotherapy, and prognostic tests.

Introduction: Routine blood tests are prognostic tests for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. New drug regimens may produce a median overall survival of 2 years or more. Methods: This single practice, IRB-approved, phase II trial examines prognostic tests, Kaplan-Meier survival, and univariate Cox regression analyses. Eligibility requires: intent-to-treat; signed consent; advanced measurable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with or without resistance to the test drugs; any adult age; performance status 0-2; and expected survival of ≥ 6 weeks. Biweekly treatment, with 1/3 of standard dosages in mg/M2, includes: Gemcitabine 500; 5-Fluorouracil 1200 over 24 hours; Leucovorin 180; Irinotecan 80; and on day 2, Oxaliplatin 40. On progression, drugs are added on day 2: first, Docetaxel 25 precedes Oxaliplatin, with or without Mitomycin C 6 after Oxaliplatin. The next sequential additions are day 1, Cetuximab 400 total mg, then 200 mg weekly, and then Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg is substituted for Cetuximab (FDA IND# 119005). Results: For 35 patients, 19 with 1-2 lines of prior therapy, resistant tumors, and 16 no prior therapy, survival at 24-months is ≥ 72 and ≥ 58%, respectively. For 14 patients aged ≥ 70 years, ≥ 63% survive 24 months, P = 0.28. Validated tests that predict ≤ 6-month survivals find median survival times of 17-months through > 2-years when compared to patients with favorable tests: Neutrophils lymphocyte ratio > 3.0, HR = 6.54, P < 6.4x10-3; absolute neutrophil count > 8000/µl, HR = 4.95, P < 6.5x10-3; serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl, HR = 4.10, P < 0.03; and lymphocyte monocyte ratio< 2.1, HR = 1.6, P = 0.50. Overall, the 76 (60-90)% of patients with 0-2 out of 4 high risk tests survive ≥ 24 months, (P = 7.1x10-3). Treatments produce neither hospitalization, neutropenic fever, severe enteritis, nor severe neuropathies. Conclusion: Two-year survival is replicable and predictable. Findings warrant phase III validation tests of sequential regimens, re-challenge with recombination, low dosages, and blood tests that are associated with lethal mechanisms that impair response and survival.

Actionable tests and treatments for patients with gastrointestinal cancers and historically short median survival times.

BACKGROUND: Patients have difficult unmet needs when standard chemotherapy produces a median survival of less than 1 year or many patients will experience severe toxicities. Blood tests can predict their survival. METHODS: Analyses evaluate predictive blood tests to identify patients who often survive 1 and 2 years. A four-test model includes: albumin, absolute neutrophil count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio. Individual tests include: alkaline phosphatase, lymphocytes, white blood count, platelet count, and hemoglobin. Eligible patients have advanced: resistant 3rd line colorectal, and both resistant and new pancreatic and intrahepatic bile duct cancers. Eligibility characteristics include: biopsy-proven, measurable metastatic disease, NCI grade 0-2 blood tests, Karnofsky Score 100-50, and any adult age. Drugs are given at 1/4-1/3 of their standard dosages biweekly: gemcitabine, irinotecan, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and day 2 oxaliplatin every 2 weeks. In case of progression, Docetaxel is added (except colon cancer), with or without Mitomycin C, and next cetuximab (except pancreatic and KRAS BRAF mutation cancers). Bevacizumab is substituted for cetuximab in case of another progression or ineligibility. Consent was written and conforms with Helsinki, IRB, and FDA criteria (FDA #119005). RESULTS: Median survival is 14.5 months. Of 205 patients, 60% survive 12, and 37% survive 24 months (95% CI ± 8%). Survival is > 24, 13, and 3.8 months for patients with 0, 1-2, and 3-4 unfavorable tests, respectively. Individual "favorable and unfavorable" tests predict long and short survival. Neither age nor prior therapy discernibly affects survival. Net rates of clinically significant toxicities are less than 5%. CONCLUSION: Treatments reproduce predictable, greater than 12 and 24-month chances of survival for the aged and for patients with drug-resistant tumors. Evaluation of blood tests may change practice, expand eligibility, and personalize treatments. Findings support investigation of drug combinations and novel dosages to reverse resistance and improve safety.

Hypogonadism in men with multiple sclerosis: Prevalence and clinical associations.

It has been hypothesized that multiple sclerosis (MS) has hormonal influences, and testosterone may have anti-inflammatory functions in this context. Given prior reports of lower testosterone levels in men with MS in archival serum samples, we evaluated the prevalence of hypogonadism in the clinical setting and its association with disability in men with MS. Subjects were screened for symptoms of hypogonadism using a clinical instrument, and those with positive screens had total and free morning testosterone levels checked. Of the 64 subjects who were screened, 50 (78%) had positive results, and 46 (92%) had morning testosterone levels checked. Among the latter, 5 were found to have testosterone levels below lower limit of normal. Other than the expected inverse relation with BMI, testosterone did not correlate with demographic or disease related factors. Baseline testosterone did not predict risk of EDSS or T25-FW progression or future MRI activity.

Randomized, clinical trial of RT001: Early signals of efficacy in Friedreich's ataxia.

BACKGROUND: RT001 is a deuterated ethyl linoleate that inhibits lipid peroxidation and is hypothesized to reduce cellular damage and recover mitochondrial function in degenerative diseases such as Friedreich's ataxia. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of RT001 in Friedreich's ataxia patients. DESIGN/METHODS: We conducted a phase I/II double-blind, comparator-controlled trial with 2 doses of RT001 in Friedreich's ataxia patients (9 subjects each cohort). Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive either RT001 (1.8 or 9.0 g/day), or a matching dose of nondeuterated ethyl linoleate as comparator for 28 days. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic analysis. Secondary endpoints included cardiopulmonary exercise testing and timed 25-foot walk. RESULTS: Nineteen patients enrolled in the trial, and 18 completed all safety and efficacy measurements. RT001 was found to be safe and tolerable, with plasma levels approaching saturation by 28 days. One subject with a low body mass index experienced steatorrhea taking a high dose and discontinued the study. Deuterated arachidonic acid (a brain-penetrant metabolite of RT001) was found to be present in plasma on day 28. There was an improvement in peak workload in the drug group compared to placebo (0.16 watts/kg; P = 0.008), as well as an improvement trend in peak oxygen consumption (change of 0.16 L/min; P = 0.116), and in stride speed (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: RT001 was found to be safe and tolerable over 28 days, and improved peak workload. Further research into the effect of RT001 in Friedreich's ataxia is warranted. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Exatecan mesylate is a hexacyclic, water-soluble, topoisomerase-1 inhibitor. Exatecan has single-agent and combination activity with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. A multicenter, randomized, phase III trial comparing exatecan plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and no prior chemotherapy. Radiation alone for locally advanced disease was permitted. Patients were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis. For the exatecan plus gemcitabine arm, exatecan 2.0 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 were administered on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Gemcitabine alone was dosed at 1,000 mg/m2 up to 7 weeks in the first cycle, then once a week for the first 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. Tumor assessment was performed every 6 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. An intent-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: From August 2001 to January 2003, 349 patients were randomly assigned, 175 to exatecan plus gemcitabine and 174 to gemcitabine alone. Twenty-four patients (6.9%) were not treated. The median survival time was 6.7 months for exatecan plus gemcitabine and 6.2 months for gemcitabine alone (P = .52). One complete response (CR; < 1%) and 11 partial responses (PRs; 6.3%) were observed in the exatecan plus gemcitabine treatment group, and one CR (< 1%) and eight PRs (4.6%) were observed in the gemcitabine-alone group. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were higher for the exatecan plus gemcitabine arm versus the gemcitabine alone arm; neutropenia (30% v 15%) and thrombocytopenia (15% v 4%). CONCLUSION: Exatecan plus gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine alone with respect to overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

A phase II clinical and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) in patients with untreated metastatic gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the anti-tumor activity DX-8951f when administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks to patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer, and to evaluate toxicities and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DX-8951f in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. All had previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer. DX-8951f was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Responses were assessed after every 2 courses using RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were evaluable. Two patients achieved a partial response (PR) and 18 achieved stable disease (SD), including five patients with unconfirmed PR. A total of 141 courses of therapy were delivered (median 3, range 1-10). The most common drug-related toxicity was neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicities were mostly mild to moderate; the most common were nausea, vomiting and anorexia. Plasma concentrations of DX-8951 (the anhydrous form of DX-8951f) were well described using a linear 2-compartment PK model. All concentrations and dose events were simultaneously modeled and explained by the population PK model. There was no evidence of non-linearity in the elimination PK, auto-inhibition or induction of DX-8951 clearance over the five days of administration. CONCLUSIONS: DX-8951f had modest activity against metastatic gastric cancer and its PK was dose-proportional. The toxicity profile was predictable and manageable. Further development of this agent is warranted.

A Phase II study of intravenous exatecan administered daily for 5 days, every 3 weeks to patients with biliary tract cancers.

PURPOSE: Exatecan is a hexacyclic topoisomerase-1 inhibitor that has broad in vitro and in vivo activity. A multicenter phase II study to determine the antitumor activity of exatecan was conducted in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with 0 to 1 prior chemotherapy regimens, adequate major organ function, and metastatic disease were eligible. Exatecan was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes daily on days 1 through 5 every 21 days. The primary end point was overall response rate: complete response and partial response (PR). A Simon optimal 2-stage design was employed. Response was assessed every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled. Two of 41 evaluated patients (4.9%) had a PR, 4 patients (9.8%) had a minor response, and 12 had stable disease. Twenty patients (51.2%) had progressive disease. The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia. The median overall survival was 7 months. The 6-month survival rate was 56.1% and the 12-month survival rate was 31.7%. CONCLUSION: Exatecan has minimal activity in advanced biliary tree cancers. Toxicity was predictable and manageable.

A Phase I and pharmocokinetic study of exatecan mesylate administered as a protracted 21-day infusion in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of administering exatecan, a water-soluble, potent camptothecin analogue, as a protracted 21-day continuous i.v. infusion (CIVI). The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of exatecan on a 21-day CIVI schedule, characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior, and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Exatecan dose-schedule development was performed in two stages using the modified Continual Reassessment Method and single patient cohorts. First, patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with exatecan (0.15 mg/m(2)/day) as a CIVI for 5 days, and the duration of the CIVI was incrementally increased from 5 to 21 days. In the second stage of the study, the dose was incrementally increased to derive a tolerable dose of exatecan administered as 21-day CIVI. The MTD was defined for both minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients as the highest dose level at which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity does not exceed 20%. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were treated with 100 courses of exatecan at 6 dose-schedule levels. The incidence of the principal dose-limiting toxicities, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was unacceptably high at exatecan doses exceeding 0.15 mg/m(2)/day as a 21-day CIVI, which was determined to be the MTD for both MP and HP patients. The pharmacokinetics of exatecan were dose-proportional, and mean [coefficient of variation (percentage) steady-state concentration (plasma concentration at steady-state)] values ranged from 6.88 (80.6) to 19.41 (74.2) ng/ml at exatecan dose levels ranging from 0.15 to 0.30 mg/m(2)/day, which are similar to IC(50) values against human tumor cell lines treated for shorter periods. Mean pharamacokinetic parameters for total exatecan derived from a compartmental model included clearance and volume of distribution values of 1.39 (86.9) liters/h/m(2) and 39.66 (197.4) liters, respectively. Two HP patients with non-small cell lung and unknown primary carcinomas had partial responses, and objective evidence of anticancer activity and clinical benefit were noted in several other individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of exatecan as a 21-day CIVI at doses as high as 0.15 mg/m(2)/day is safe and feasible for both MP and HP patients. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of exatecan on this schedule, the paucity of severe nonhematological toxicities, and documented anticancer activity in several drug-refractory malignancies warrant further evaluation of the merits of administering exatecan by either a CIVI or alternate drug delivery systems to achieve protracted systemic exposure.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a hexacyclic camptothecin, on a daily-times-five schedule in patients with advanced leukemia.

PURPOSE: DX-8951f is a novel hexacyclic camptothecin-analogue topoisomerase I inhibitor with both in vitro antileukemic activity and myelosuppression as a dose-limiting toxicity in solid tumor Phase I studies. DX-8951f is active in a human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) severe combined immunodeficient mouse model. In a leukemia Phase I study, we investigated the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of DX-8951f in patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML or acute lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: DX-8951f was given as an i.v. infusion over 30 min daily for 5 or 7 days. The starting dose was 0.6 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days (3.0 mg/m(2)/course). Courses were given every 3-4 weeks according to toxicity and antileukemic efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (AML, 21 patients; myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 patient; acute lymphocytic leukemia, 2 patients; CML-BP, 1 patient) were treated. Stomatitis was the dose-limiting toxicity, occurring in two of two patients treated at 1.35 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, two of three treated at 1.2 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, and one of six treated at 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 7 days. The recommended Phase II dose was 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. The pharmacokinetics of DX-8951 was linear and well fit by a two-compartment model. CONCLUSIONS: Phase II studies are warranted to further define the activity of DX-8951f in patients with hematological malignancies.