Relationship between peripheral arterial reactive hyperemia and the index of myocardial resistance in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the role of reactive digital hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) as a non-invasive tool to identify patients with impaired coronary microvasculature. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were consecutively assessed for peripheral microvascular endothelial function before coronary angiography: both the Reactive Hyperemic Index (RHI) and the Framingham reactive hyperemic index (Endoscore) were measured. During coronary angiography, the Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) was measured in all patients, and an IMR value > 25 identified patients with coronary microvascular impairment. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients with chronic coronary syndromes candidate to coronary angiography were included. Those with coronary microvascular impairment (n = 18 [38%]) presented with significantly lower RHI (1.68 ± 0.38 vs. 1.94 ± 0.93, p = 0.04) and Endoscore 0.50 ± 0.23 vs. 0.64 ± 0.23, p = 0.04) values as compared with patients with preserved coronary microvasculature. A significant relationship was observed between IMR with both RHI (r = 0.35, p = 0.02) and Endoscore (r = 0.34, p = 0.02). At the multivariable analysis, RHI and Endoscore were the only independent predictors of an IMR > 25. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that digital reactive hyperemia indexes are lower in patients with high IMR values, suggesting a role for RH-PAT as non-invasive tool for identifying patients with coronary microvascular impairment.

Effects of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system on hypertension-induced target organ damage: clinical and experimental evidence.

The dysregulation of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) plays a pivotal role in hypertension and in the development of the related target organ damage (TOD). The main goal of treating hypertension is represented by the long-term reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. RAS inhibition either by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors or by type 1 Angiotensin II receptors blockers (ARBs), reduce the incidence of CV events in hypertensive patients. Actually, ACE-inhibitors and ARBs have been demonstrated to be effective to prevent, or delay TOD like left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerosis. The beneficial effects of RAS blockers on clinical outcome of hypertensive patients are due to the key role of angiotensin II in the pathogenesis of TOD. In particular, Angiotensin II through an inflammatory-mediated mechanism plays a role in the initiation, progression and vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque. In addition, Angiotensin II can be considered the hormonal transductor of the pressure overload in cardiac myocytes, and through an autocrine-paracrine mechanism plays a role in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. Angiotensin II by modulating the redox status and the immune system participates to the development of chronic kidney disease. The RAS blocker should be considered the first therapeutic option in patients with hypertension, even if ACE-inhibitors and ARBs have different impact on CV prevention. ARBs seem to have greater neuro-protective effects, while ACE-inhibitors have greater cardio-protective action.