Comparison between children and adults intussusception. Description of two cases and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Intussusception is a common condition in children, it is rare in adults. Adult intussusception differs from pediatric intussusception in various respects, including etiology clinical characteristics and therapy. METHODS: We present and discuss a new case of intussusception in children and adults. RESULTS: In child the Barium Enema x-ray examination is identified an endoluminal filling defect to refer to the apex of the invaginated loop at the rectal level, with slow ascent during the progressive injection of the radiopaque contrast medium. At the end of the procedure, incomplete reduction of the picture is documented. The patient undergoes emergency surgery where the presence of an ileo-ceco-colic invagination is documented. Intussusception is reduced by taxis. In the adult laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed. High-grade B-cell Burkitt's lymphoma was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. DISCUSSION: In contrast to intussusceptions in children, in the adult population, a demonstrable etiology is found in most of the cases. In adults surgery is always indicated. The non-invasive resolutive intervention most commonly used in the child and best known consists in the rectal introduction of a radiopaque contrast medium (air or barium) at controlled pressure until. CONCLUSIONS: Although intussusceptions occur at all ages, there are major differences in the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and management between pediatric and adult populations. Intussusception is remarkably different in these two age groups and it must be approached from a different clinical perspective. KEY WORDS: Intussusception in children, Intussusception in adults, Intussusception symptoms, Radiology and treatment.

A case of Type 2 appendiceal diverticulum perforated and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal diverticulosis disease is a rare entity. An perforated appendiceal diverticulosis mimicking acute appendicitis is a extremely unusual surgical finding and the reported prevalence is between 0.014 and 3.7%. CASE REPORT: We report the case of an elderly man, who presented with a typical clinical image of acute appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic surgery. Intraoperative an acute appendicitis with localized peritonitis was identified and a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed, but pathologic analysis demonstrated a type 2 appendiceal diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Appendiceal diverticulosis disease should be included in differential diagnosis of patients presenting with clinical signs of an acute appendicitis and prompt surgical treatment is essential in order to avoid severe complications.