Echocardiographic integrated backscatter for detecting progression and regression of aortic valve calcifications in rats.

BACKGROUND: Calcification is an independent predictor of mortality in calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of non-invasive, non-ionizing echocardiographic calibrated integrated backscatter (cIB) for monitoring progression and subsequent regression of aortic valvular calcifications in a rat model of reversible renal failure with CAVD, compared to histology. METHODS: 28 male Wistar rats were prospectively followed during 21 weeks. Group 1 (N=14) was fed with a 0.5% adenine diet for 9 weeks to induce renal failure and CAVD. Group 2 (N=14) received a standard diet. At week 9, six animals of each group were killed. The remaining animals of group 1 (N=8) and group 2 (N=8) were kept on a standard diet for an additional 12 weeks. cIB of the aortic valve was calculated at baseline, 9 and 21 weeks, followed by measurement of the calcified area (Ca Area) on histology. RESULTS: At week 9, cIB values and Ca Area of the aortic valve were significantly increased in the adenine-fed rats compared to baseline and controls. After 12 weeks of adenine diet cessation, cIB values and Ca Area of group 1 decreased compared to week 9, while there was no longer a significant difference compared to age-matched controls of group 2. CONCLUSIONS: cIB is a non-invasive tool allowing quantitative monitoring of CAVD progression and regression in a rat model of reversible renal failure, as validated by comparison with histology. This technique might become useful for assessing CAVD during targeted therapy.

Homocysteine measurement by Vitros Microtip homocysteine assay.

BACKGROUND: Elevated circulating total homocysteine is an independent vascular risk factor. Enzymatic homocysteine measurements represent an alternative to HPLC- or immunochemistry-based assays, suitable for automation. Here, we report on analytical performance of a commercial cystathionine beta-synthase-based assay, for use on Vitros automated analyzers. METHODS: Linear range, limit of detection and analytical sensitivity were inferred from duplicate measurements of homocystine standard solutions (1-65 micromol/L). Imprecision was assessed using commercial controls according to NCCLS EP5-A2 and accuracy using NIST-SRM1955 reference material. Agreement with a clinically validated HPLC method was examined on 207 patient samples. RESULTS: The enzymatic assay was linear from 1 to 90 micromol/L homocysteine. Total (within-day) imprecision ranged from 4.5 (3.9)% to 2.8 (1.6)% at homocysteine 9.7-43.2 micromol/L. Accuracy was acceptable at 8.9 and 17.7 micromol/L homocysteine, with +6.4% and -1.2% bias, respectively, but showed substantial negative bias (-20.1%) at 4.0 micromol/L. High triglycerides (19.8 micromol/L) negatively interfered. The enzymatic method was slightly less sensitive than the HPLC method (limit of detection 0.7 and 0.2 micromol/L, respectively) but correlated well with the latter (r2=0.9997, slope=1.04, intercept=-0.66 micromol/L) and was more precise (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Vitros homocysteine assay met the CLIA Desirable Analytical Quality Specifications at homocysteine > or = 9 micromol/L. Its analytical performance and suitability for automation make the Vitros assay an analytically acceptable alternative to HPLC-based methods.