Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 73
Filtrar
1.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 23(9): 703-709, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36039720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of cerebral ischemia, and its early detection may impact on health. Both invasive and non-invasive devices can be used for the diagnosis of AF. The aim of our study was to estimate the prevalence of AF using a single-lead ECG device (MyDiagnostickTM) on an adult, asymptomatic population during a screening campaign. METHODS: A total of 2547 subjects underwent AF screening. RESULTS: The device detected an arrhythmia in 42 subjects (1.65%), and AF was confirmed on 12-lead ECG in 14 (0.55%) of them. The prevalence of confirmed AF increased in subjects over 65 years of age (1.21%) or with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 in males or ≥3 in females (1.33%). Furthermore, heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 8.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87-39.6, p=0.006) and diabetes (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.25-16.5, p=0.021) significantly increased the risk of AF. CONCLUSIONS: During a screening campaign, the diagnosis of AF increases when subjects with a high thromboembolic risk are selected.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Tromboembolia , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Feminino , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/complicações
2.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 3: 100055, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34557800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has put several healthcare systems under severe pressure. The present analysis investigates how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the myocardial infarction (MI) network of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). METHODS: Based on Emilia-Romagna mortality registry and administrative data from all the hospitals from January 2017 to June 2020, we analysed: i) temporal trend in MI hospital admissions; ii) characteristics, management, and 30-day mortality of MI patients; iii) out-of-hospital mortality for cardiac cause. FINDINGS: Admissions for MI declined on February 22, 2020 (IRR -19.5%, 95%CI from -8.4% to -29.3%, p = 0.001), and further on March 5, 2020 (IRR -21.6%, 95%CI from -9.0% to -32.5%, p = 0.001). The return to pre-COVID-19 MI-related admission levels was observed from May 13, 2020 (IRR 34.3%, 95%CI 20.0%-50.2%, p<0.001). As compared to those before the pandemic, MI patients admitted during and after the first wave were younger and with fewer risk factors. The 30-day mortality remained in line with that expected based on previous years (ratio observed/expected was 0.96, 95%CI 0.84-1.08). MI patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were few (1.5%) but showed poor prognosis (around 5-fold increase in 30-day mortality). In 2020, the number of out-of-hospital cardiac deaths was significantly higher (ratio observed/expected 1.17, 95%CI 1.08-1.27). The peak was reached in April. INTERPRETATION: In Emilia-Romagna, MI hospitalizations significantly decreased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Management and outcomes of hospitalized MI patients remained unchanged, except for those with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A concomitant increase in the out-of-hospital cardiac mortality was observed. FUNDING: None.

3.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 22(3): 188-192, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33687369

RESUMO

The dramatic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic extends beyond the risk of deaths related to virus infection. Excess deaths from other causes, particularly cardiovascular deaths, have been reported worldwide. Our study based on administrative databases of the Emilia-Romagna region demonstrates a 17% excess of out-of-hospital cardiac deaths in the first 2020 semester with a peak of +62% on April. The excess of cardiac deaths may be explained by the indirect consequences of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These include a dramatic reduction of hospital admissions during the pandemic, particularly for acute coronary syndromes; an increase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests; a reduction of outpatient clinic activities and cardiac procedures; long-term cardiovascular effects of COVID-19; and unfavorable cardiac effects of the lockdown imposed by the spread of COVID-19 infection. The knowledge of the indirect consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is important for planning cardiologic strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia
4.
Biology (Basel) ; 9(8)2020 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707770

RESUMO

In the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, cancer patients could be a high-risk group due to their immunosuppressed status; therefore, data on cancer patients must be available in order to consider the most adequate strategy of care. We carried out a cohort study on the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19, oncological history, and outcomes on COVID-19 infected cancer patients admitted to the Hospital of Reggio Emilia. Between 1 February and 3 April 2020, a total of 1226 COVID-19 infected patients were hospitalized. The number of cancer patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection was 138 (11.3%). The median age was slightly higher in patients with cancers than in those without (76.5 vs. 73.0). The risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (10.1% vs. 6.7%; RR 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.63-2.41) and risk of death (34.1% vs. 26.0%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.71) were similar in cancer and non-cancer patients. In the cancer patients group, 89/138 (64.5%) patients had a time interval >5 years between the diagnosis of the tumor and hospitalization. Male gender, age > 74 years, metastatic disease, bladder cancer, and cardiovascular disease were associated with mortality risk in cancer patients. In the Reggio Emilia Study, the incidence of hospitalization for COVID-19 in people with previous diagnosis of cancer is similar to that in the general population (standardized incidence ratio 98; 95% CI 73-131), and it does not appear to have a more severe course or a higher mortality rate than patients without cancer. The phase II of the COVID-19 epidemic in cancer patients needs a strategy to reduce the likelihood of infection and identify the vulnerable population, both in patients with active antineoplastic treatment and in survivors with frequently different coexisting medical conditions.

5.
Breast ; 53: 51-58, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32629156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A set of indicators to assess the quality of care for women operated for breast cancer was developed by an expert working group of the Italian Health Ministry in order to compare the Italian regions. A study to validate these indicators through their relationship with survival was carried out. METHODS: The 16,753 women who were residents in three Italian regions (Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna and Lazio) and hospitalized for breast cancer surgery during 2011 entered the cohort and were followed until 2016. Adherence to selected recommendations (i.e., surgery timeliness, medical therapy timeliness, appropriateness of complementary radiotherapy and mammographic follow-up) was assessed. Multivariable proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios for the association between adherence with recommendations and the risk of all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Adherence to recommendations was 53% for medical therapy timeliness, 73% for appropriateness of mammographic follow-up, 74% for surgery timeliness and 82% for appropriateness of complementary radiotherapy. Risk reductions of 26%, 62% and 56% were observed for adherence to recommendations on medical therapy timeliness, appropriateness of complementary radiotherapy and mammographic follow-up, respectively. There was no evidence that mortality was affected by surgery timeliness. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical benefits are expected from improvements in adherence to the considered recommendations. Close control of women operated for breast cancer through medical care timeliness and appropriateness of radiotherapy and mammographic monitoring must be considered the cornerstone of national guidance, national audits, and quality improvement incentive schemes.


Assuntos
Protocolos Antineoplásicos/normas , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia/mortalidade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Mastectomia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
6.
Eur J Public Health ; 30(5): 916-921, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32433750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is a growing concern for healthcare systems, with many countries experiencing demographic transition to older population profiles. A simple multisource comorbidity score (MCS) has been recently developed and validated. A very large real-world investigation was conducted with the aim of measuring inequalities in the MCS distribution across Italy. METHODS: Beneficiaries of the Italian National Health Service aged 50-85 years who in 2018 were resident in one of the 10 participant regions formed the study population (15.7 million of the 24.9 million overall resident in Italy). MCS was assigned to each beneficiary by categorizing the individual sum of the comorbid values (i.e. the weights corresponding to the comorbid conditions of which the individual suffered) into one of the six categories denoting a progressive worsening comorbidity status. MCS distributions in women and men across geographic partitions were compared. RESULTS: Compared with beneficiaries from northern Italy, those from centre and south showed worse comorbidity profile for both women and men. MCS median age (i.e. the age above which half of the beneficiaries suffered at least one comorbidity) ranged from 60 (centre and south) to 68 years (north) in women and from 63 (centre and south) to 68 years (north) in men. The percentage of comorbid population was lower than 50% for northern population, whereas it was around 60% for central and southern ones. CONCLUSION: MCS allowed of capturing geographic variability of multimorbidity prevalence, thus showing up its value for addressing health policy in order to guide national health planning.


Assuntos
Multimorbidade , Medicina Estatal , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência
7.
Palliat Med ; 32(8): 1344-1352, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29886795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies demonstrate substantial utilization of acute hospital care and, potentially excessive, intensive medical and surgical treatments at the end-of-life. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between the use of home and facility-based hospice palliative care for patients dying with cancer and service utilization at the end of life. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-level study using administrative databases. The effect of palliative care was analyzed between coarsened exact matched cohorts and evaluated through a conditional logistic regression model. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted on the cohort of 34,357 patients, resident in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of metastatic or poor-prognosis cancer during the 6 months before death between January 2013 and December 2015. RESULTS: Patients who received palliative care experienced significantly lower rates of all indicators of aggressive care such as hospital admission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.06), emergency department visits (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.21-0.25), intensive care unit stays (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26-0.32), major operating room procedures (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.21-0.24), and lower in-hospital death (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.10-0.11). This cohort had significantly higher rates of opiate prescriptions (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.21-1.33) ( p < 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Use of palliative care at the end of life for cancer patients is associated with a reduction of the use of high-cost, intensive services. Future research is necessary to evaluate the impact of increasing use of palliative care services on other health outcomes. Administrative databases linked at the patient level are a useful data source for assessment of care at the end of life.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 19(7): 382-388, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29877976

RESUMO

AIMS: Triple valve surgery (TVS) may still be considered a challenge in cardiac surgery, and is still associated with a not negligible mortality and morbidity. This study analyzed retrospectively patients' data from RERIC (Registro Regionale degli Interventi Cardiochirurgici) registry, to evaluate early and mid-term results of TVS. METHODS: From April 2002 to December 2013, data from n = 44 211 cardiac surgical procedures were collected from six Cardiac Surgery Departments (RERIC). Two hundred and eighty patients undergoing TVS were identified, including aortic and mitral replacement with tricuspid repair in 211 patients (75.3%), aortic replacement with mitral and tricuspid repair in 64 (22.9%) and triple valve replacement in 5 (1.8%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall mortality or adverse outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67.5 ±â€Š12.2. Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 7.9%: in-hospital mortality was 10.9% in mitral valve repair and 6.6% in mitral valve replacement, respectively. Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with the highest mortality rate (40%). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were serum creatinine greater than 2 mg/dl [odds ratio (OR) 4.5; P = 0.03], concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (OR 3.8; P = 0.01) and previous cardiac surgery (OR 5.1; P = 0.04). Overall cumulative mortality rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 14.7, 24.1 and 28.9%, respectively. Mitral valve replacement associated with tricuspid valve repair showed better survival rate (hazard ratio 0.1; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: TVS has demonstrated satisfactory results in terms of in-hospital and mid-term mortality rate. Renal failure, reoperations and concomitant CABG resulted as risk factors for mortality; moreover, we could not demonstrate a mid-term better survival rate of mitral valve repair compared with the replacement.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
BMJ Open ; 7(12): e019503, 2017 12 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a novel comorbidity score (multisource comorbidity score (MCS)) predictive of mortality, hospital admissions and healthcare costs using multiple source information from the administrative Italian National Health System (NHS) databases. METHODS: An index of 34 variables (measured from inpatient diagnoses and outpatient drug prescriptions within 2 years before baseline) independently predicting 1-year mortality in a sample of 500 000 individuals aged 50 years or older randomly selected from the NHS beneficiaries of the Italian region of Lombardy (training set) was developed. The corresponding weights were assigned from the regression coefficients of a Weibull survival model. MCS performance was evaluated by using an internal (ie, another sample of 500 000 NHS beneficiaries from Lombardy) and three external (each consisting of 500 000 NHS beneficiaries from Emilia-Romagna, Lazio and Sicily) validation sets. Discriminant power and net reclassification improvement were used to compare MCS performance with that of other comorbidity scores. MCS ability to predict secondary health outcomes (ie, hospital admissions and costs) was also investigated. RESULTS: Primary and secondary outcomes progressively increased with increasing MCS value. MCS improved the net 1-year mortality reclassification from 27% (with respect to the Chronic Disease Score) to 69% (with respect to the Elixhauser Index). MCS discrimination performance was similar in the four regions of Italy we tested, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (95% CI) being 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Lombardy, 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Emilia-Romagna, 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78) in Lazio and 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Sicily. CONCLUSION: MCS seems better than conventional scores for predicting health outcomes, at least in the general population from Italy. This may offer an improved tool for risk adjustment, policy planning and identifying patients in need of a focused treatment approach in the everyday medical practice.


Assuntos
Comorbidade/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Medicina Estatal/economia
10.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 44(4): 466-474, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28994036

RESUMO

Aim of the study was to compare four different strategies of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with PCI. DAPT with Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor and Prasugrel has proved to be effective in patients with ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by reducing major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE). However, the effect of the different strategies in a real-world population deserves further verification. A retrospective analysis of 2404 discharged ACS patients treated with PCI was performed, with a median follow-up of 1 year. The study population was stratified in four drug treatment cohorts: ASA + Clopidogrel (A-C), ASA + Plavix (A-PLx), ASA + Ticagrelor (A-T), ASA + Prasugrel (A-P). We assessed the incidence of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE): all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke and bleeding during follow-up. At 1-year, the use of A-C and A-PLx was associated with the highest cumulative incidence of NACE in comparison with A-T and A-P therapies (respectively 14.8 and 29.6% vs. 9.2 and 6%). This difference was mainly driven by the mortality and TVR outcomes. Considering selection bias and differences in the patients baseline characteristics, the association of A-T and A-P seems to be superior in comparison with a DAPT strategy of A-C and A-PLx in low risk ACS-PCI patients from real world. In our Region the prescription is consistent with guidelines recommendations and Clopidogrel and Plavix are still predominantly used in older patients with more comorbidities, and this could partially explain the inferiority of this association.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Clopidogrel , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapêutico
11.
BMJ Open ; 7(9): e016415, 2017 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965094

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cross-sectional patient distribution and standardised 30-day mortality in the intensive care units (ICU) of an inclusive hub and spoke trauma system. SETTING: ICUs of the Integrated System for Trauma Patient Care (SIAT) of Emilia-Romagna, an Italian region with a population of approximately 4.5 million. PARTICIPANTS: 5300 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 were admitted to the regional ICUs and recorded in the Regional Severe Trauma Registry between 2007 and 2012. Patients were classified by the Abbreviated Injury Score as follows: (1) traumatic brain injury (2) multiple injuriesand (3) extracranial lesions. The SIATs were divided into those with at least one neurosurgical level II trauma centre (TC) and those with a neurosurgical unit in the level I TC only. RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients (out of all SIAT patients) were admitted to the level I TC at the head of the SIAT with no additional neurosurgical facilities (1083/1472, 73.6%) compared with the level I TCs heading SIATs with neurosurgical level II TCs (1905/3815; 49.9%). A similar percentage of patients were admitted to level I TCs (1905/3815; 49.9%) and neurosurgical level II TCs (1702/3815, 44.6%) in the SIATs with neurosurgical level II TCs. Observed versus expected mortality (OE) was not statistically different among the three types of centre with a neurosurgical unit; however, the best mean OE values were observed in the level I TC in the SIAT with no neurosurgical unit. CONCLUSION: The Hub and Spoke concept was fully applied in the SIAT in which neurosurgical facilities were available in the level I TC only. The performance of this system suggests that competition among level I and level II TCs in the same Trauma System reduces performance in both. The density of neurosurgical centres must be considered by public health system governors before implementing trauma systems.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/classificação , Ferimentos e Lesões/classificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Itália/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Ann Ital Chir ; 88: 215-221, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28874618

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain the variability and to identify a trend for the outcome of cholecystectomy surgery when used to treat cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis. METHODS: This was a large retrospective cohort study following patients up to 11 years post surgery, based on administrative data collected from 2002 to 2012 in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy) and comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of surgical activity (laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC)). Analyses included patient characteristics, length of hospital stay, type of admission and mortality risk. Outcomes considered were death from all causes (during the index hospital admission or thereafter), hospital readmissions with cholecystitis or cholelithiasis as principal diagnosis and time to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 84,628 cholecystomies were performed from 2002 to 2012 out of 123,061 admissions with primary diagnostic category of cholecystitis or cholelitiasis. Laparoscopic procedure was used in 69,842 patients. Over time there was a rising linear statistically significant trend in the use of LC. Mortality rate at 1 year of OC treated patients showed a statistically significant difference compared to LC treated patients (using a cohorts match with propensity score). Only a small number of patients with acute cholecystitis was operated according guidelines within 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of aggregate administrative data is a powerful tool to support regional health management, improve the quality of medical care, and assess the appropriateness of therapeutic or diagnostic approaches. It is important to stress a short hospital stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (50% less than open surgery): this shorter hospital stay leads to a significant economic advantage. Moreover, mortality is significantly higher in open surgery for acute cholecystitis. Interestingly, the same finding was confirmed after 30 days and 1 year, probably due to comorbidities that are more evident in open surgery. KEY WORDS: Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Delivery of health care, Disease management, Surgical.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Colecistectomia/tendências , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/tendências , Colecistite/epidemiologia , Colecistite/cirurgia , Colelitíase/epidemiologia , Colelitíase/cirurgia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 35(2): 201-208, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28134078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To perform a population-based study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic treatments. METHODS: 1087 patients with RA were enrolled; inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed RA, already diagnosed RA with high disease activity (HDA) (DAS28≥4.2) starting biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), already diagnosed RA with HDA continuing with conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). The following data were collected: demographics, clinical and laboratory features, imaging and prescribed drugs. All parameters except immunology and imaging (performed yearly) were repeated at each follow-up evaluations (after 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter every 12 months). In order to evaluate clinical response, the EULAR response criteria were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: 414 (38.1%) newly diagnosed patients with RA, 477 (43.9%) RA patients who started bDMARDs and 196 (18.0%) RA patients who continued with cDMARDs were enrolled from April 2012 to March 2015 at 12 Rheumatology Centres in the Emilia Romagna Region. Statistical analyses showed a relative risk ratio (RRR) for moderate response of 1.65 in RA patients who started bDMARDs (p=0.16) and 2.49 for newly diagnosed RA (p=0.01). Sex, age and Health Assessment Questionnaire were not statistically significant. A RRR of 2.00 has been confirmed for RA patients who started bDMARDs (p<0.0005) for a good response as well as 2.20 for newly diagnosed RA (p<0.0005). An increase in adverse events among bDMARDs was found, but when looking at infections or neoplasia, no differences were highlighted between RA which started bDMARDs and RA who continued with cDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with already published papers from British and Swedish Registries: a greater likelihood to have a good response is demonstrated for not longstanding RA starting cDMARDs or RA with HDA when a bDMARD is started. Also a good safety profile is demonstrated.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 9829487, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423414

RESUMO

The aim of this retrospective multicenter registry study was to investigate age-dependent trends in mortality, long-term survival, and comorbidity over time in patients who underwent isolated CABG from 2003 to 2015. The percentage of patients < 60 years of age was 18.9%. Female sex, chronic pulmonary disease, extracardiac arteriopathy, and neurologic dysfunction disease were significantly less frequent in this younger population. The prevalence of BMI ≥ 30, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative severe depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, and history of previous PCI were significantly higher in this population. After PS matching, at 5 years, patients < 60 years of age reported significantly lower overall mortality (p < 0.0001), cardiac-related mortality (p < 0.0001), incidence of acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.01), and stroke rates (p < 0.0001). Patients < 60 years required repeated revascularization more frequently than older patients (p = 0.05). Patients < 60 who underwent CABG had a lower risk of adverse outcomes than older patients. Patients < 60 have a different clinical pattern of presentation of CAD in comparison with more elderly patients. These issues require focused attention in order to design and improve preventive strategies aiming to reduce the impact of specific cardiovascular risk factors for younger patients, such as diet, lifestyle, and weight control.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia
15.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 11(1): 144, 2016 Sep 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27716382

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gender on outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, in terms of 5-year rates of overall death, cardiac-related death, myocardial infarction, re-hospitalization, repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, stroke, new pacemaker implantation, postoperative renal failure, heart failure and need for long-term care. METHODS: Two propensity-score matched cohorts, each of 1331 patients, undergoing isolated surgical coronary revascularization at the regional public and private centers of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) from January 1st 2003 to December 31th 2013, were used to compare long-term outcomes of male (5976 patients) versus female gender (1332 patients). RESULTS: In the matched cohort, males received significantly more bypass grafts (3.0 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.001). Left internal mammary artery use and total arterial revascularization were similarly performed in both matched subgroups. Both groups reported similar cumulative rate of all-cause, cardiac-related mortality and stroke at five years. Females experienced significantly higher rate of myocardial infarction, and not significantly higher occurrence of heart failure, and need for long-term care. Males experienced significantly higher rate of cumulative re-hospitalization and higher need for pacemaker implantation. Female gender was not an independent predictor of death at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Women are more likely to be readmitted with myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure after CABG but experience survival similar to that observed in men. Female gender was not an independent risk factor for mortality. Prevention of new occurrence of postoperative myocardial infarction and enhancement of complete coronary revascularization should be future endpoints.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 22(5): 304-311, 2016 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27645551

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on the results of conventional aortic valve surgery in high-risk patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-years outcomes in this category of patients in the current surgical era. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study of 581 high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2008 to 2013, with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6% ± 14.6%. Data were prospectively collected in a database of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 9.3%. Stroke rate was 1.5%. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years overall mortality was 18.2%, 30.4%, and 42.2%, cardiac death rate was 3.9%, 9.2%, and 12.9%, stroke rate 2.5%, 7.7%, and 10.2%, re-operation occurrence 0.2%, 0.9% and 1.3%, and new pacemaker implantation was 2.3%, 5.1% and 7.8%. At multivariate analysis, urgency, hemodynamic instability, LVEF ≤30%, NYHA III-IV, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), extra-cardiac arteriopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL remained independent predictors of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study add weight to the evidence that traditional aortic valve replacement can be performed in high-risk patients with satisfactory 5-year mortality and morbidity. Our study may help to improve decision-making in this category of high-risk patients with aortic valve disease.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Tumori ; 102(6): 614-620, 2016 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27514312

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite the preference of many patients to die at home, high proportions of patients with advanced cancer undergo major procedures, receive intensive care, and die in the hospital. The goal of this study is to examine variation in hospital utilization and site of death for patients dying with poor-prognosis cancer in the Regione Emilia-Romagna (RER), Italy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-level study using administrative data. Patients were included if they died in 2012 and had at least one hospital admission for metastatic or poor-prognosis cancer within 180 days of death. Variations in the use of the hospital, intensive care, and procedures performed were evaluated. RESULTS: 11,470 patients died with metastatic or poor-prognosis cancer in 2012. Seventy-eight percent of patients were hospitalized in the last month of life while 50.7% of patients died in the hospital. Results varied by local health authority from 38.3% to 69.3%. Of patients who had an ICU stay, 55.1% in the community hospitals and 59.8% in the teaching hospitals were admitted to the ICU on the day of death or the day before death. 7.5% of patients underwent a major procedure in the last 30 days of life. CONCLUSIONS: The overall high rate, and substantial variation, in hospital care at the end of life offers the RER the opportunity to evaluate if increasing availability of palliative care, along with provider and patient education, could reduce utilization of high-cost hospital care and increase patient and family satisfaction.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Assistência Terminal , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 18(6): 693-702, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27060289

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact on long-term outcomes of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and biventricular defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization (CRT-D) devices in 'real world' patients with heart failure (HF) needs to be assessed in terms of clinical effectiveness. METHODS AND RESULTS: A registry including consecutive HF patients who underwent a first implant of an ICD (891 patients) or a CRT-D device (709 patients) in 2006-2010 was followed (median 1487 days and 1516 days, respectively), collecting administrative data on survival, all-cause hospitalizations, cardiovascular or HF hospitalizations, and days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). Survival free from death/cardiac transplant was 61.9% and 63.8% at 5 years for ICD and CRT-D patients, respectively. Associated comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index) had a significant impact on death/cardiac transplant, as well as on hospitalizations. The median values of DAOH% were 97.4% for ICD and 97.7% for CRT-D patients, but data were highly skewed, with the lower quartile of DAOH% values including values ranging between 0% and 52.8% for ICD and between 0% and 56.1% for CRT-D patients. Charlson Comorbidity Index was a very strong predictor of DAOH%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were implanted in 'real world' clinical practice with an ICD or a CRT-D device have, on average, a relatively favourable outcome, with a survival of around 62-64% at 5 years, but with an important burden of hospitalizations. Comorbidities, as evaluated by means of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, have a significant impact on outcomes in terms of mortality/heart transplant, hospitalizations and days spent alive and out of hospital.


Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia , Idoso , Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/complicações , Fibrilação Ventricular/etiologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
19.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 50(3): 528-35, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118313

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare 5-year rates of overall death, cardiac-related death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke and new occurrence of postoperative renal failure in a large cohort of patients with coronary disease, treated with on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Two propensity score-matched cohorts, each of 560 patients, undergoing isolated surgical coronary revascularization at the regional public and private centres of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) over the period 1 January 2003 - 31 December 2013, were used to compare long-term outcomes of on-pump CABG (6711 patients) and off-pump CABG (597 patients). RESULTS: The matched on-pump group received significantly more bypass grafts than the matched off-pump group (2.4 ± 1.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.9, P < 0.0001). The on-pump group reported statistically significant lower cardiac-related mortality. There was a trend towards higher overall mortality and the need for repeat revascularization procedures in the off-pump group. No difference was found for myocardial infarction, stroke or new occurrence of postoperative renal failure between groups in the follow-up. The multivariate analysis of significant predictors of mortality in the overall population confirmed that the off-pump revascularization strategy was an independent predictor of death at long-term follow-up. On-pump CABG reported significantly better results in terms of mortality in the subgroups of patients with a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and in patients with three-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective isolated CABG, on-pump strategy conferred a long-term survival advantage compared with off-pump strategy, particularly for patients with more extensive coronary disease. No benefits were found in terms of reduction of postoperative morbidity with the off-pump strategy. On-pump surgery should be the preferred revascularization technique, and off-pump surgery reserved for patients for whom the perioperative risk of cardiopulmonary bypass is greater than the risk of a less complete coronary revascularization.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Previsões , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte/tendências , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
20.
Recenti Prog Med ; 107(1): 25-38, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease and transcatheter aortic valve replacement is considered as an alternative to surgical valve replacement or to medical treatment in inoperable or high-risk patients, but it is not suitable for all patients with severe aortic stenosis, taking into account also the high cost associated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis via percutaneous, (transfemoral, or endovascular approach) or surgically (transapical, or transventricular) approach. RESULTS: The present review includes 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 29 observational studies. We combined the outcomes from the individual trials through meta-analysis where possible. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome using the GRADE system. Regarding TAVI vs. standard surgery, there were no significant differences between TAVI and conventional surgery for mortality at 1 year or more, the frequency of stroke, and heart attack; for mortality at 30 days, no difference was observed in RCTs and the result was in favor of TAVI in observational studies. Another outcome in favor of TAVI was the frequency of major bleeding that was significantly lower in patients treated with TAVI. The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Regarding TAVI vs. medical therapy, for the outcome death at 1 year or more, if we consider the RCTs, the results are favorable to TAVI, while in observational studies no significant differences were observed between the two interventions. In contrast, for the outcome mortality at 30 days, in RCTs no significant differences between the two interventions were observed, while the results were favorable to TAVI in observational studies. For the frequency of stroke in the single RCT that reported this outcome, it was significantly lower in patients treated with medical therapy, with no significant differences in the results of observational studies. The results related to the frequency of heart attack from observational studies are in favor of TAVI. The quality of the evidence ranged from low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Candidates for TAVI are those patients for which conventional open-heart surgery is not recommended because of the risk due to advanced age or important comorbidities.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...