Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(7S): S146-S151, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37084924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the fourth generation of ceramics has demonstrated excellent clinical results 5 to 6 years postoperatively, concerns over ceramic fracture and squeaking persist and longer-term follow-up (minimum 10 years) studies are warranted. Our study aimed to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent primary delta CoC total hip arthroplasty in our institution between January 2004 and February 2013. Demographics, surgical techniques, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic outcomes were collected and analyzed. For continuous variables, the comparison between groups was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance. Of all 235 patients included in the study, 70.5% were women (190 hips). The mean follow-up period was 12 years (range, 10 to 18). The femoral head sizes of 28- mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm were used in 50, 26, and 197 cases, respectively. Mean acetabular inclination and anteversion angles were 39.2 ± 7.1° and 14.9 ± 3.5°. RESULTS: There were 5 hips revised at a mean 4.6 years (range, 0.1 to 7.1). One revision was squeaking-related. Squeaking was also reported by 8 other patients, but did not require revision. Other reasons for revision were early infection in 2 cases, stem loosening in 1 case, and stem fracture in 2 cases. The survival analysis for any causes for revision as an endpoint was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 0.313%-2.57%). CONCLUSION: We report excellent mean 12-year follow-up results regarding the complications and survivorship of the fourth generation CoC bearings.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas Ósseas , Prótese de Quadril , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Seguimentos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cerâmica , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Desenho de Prótese , Resultado do Tratamento , Falha de Prótese , Articulação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Quadril/cirurgia
3.
J Exp Orthop ; 9(1): 9, 2022 Jan 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35028782

RESUMO

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the preferred treatment to anterior cruciate ligament injury. With the increase in anterior cruciate ligament injuries in both adults and skeletally immature patients comes the need for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection whether it is the type of graft (auto vs. allograft) or the harvesting site (hamstrings, iliotibial band, quadriceps, patella). Several factors need to be considered preoperatively in order to optimize the patients' recovery and restore anterior cruciate ligament strength and function. These include age and bone maturity, preoperative knee flexor/extensor strength, sport participation, patient's needs and anatomical characteristics. This paper aims at bringing evidence supporting the use of a personalized approach in graft selection for faster and more efficient return to sport and propose a theoretical framework to support the approach.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...