A randomized, placebo-controlled study of loop diuretics in patients with essential hypertension: the bumetanide and furosemide on lipid profile (BUFUL) clinical study report.

This study was conducted to determine whether loop diuretics are more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure without raising serum lipid levels, and whether bumetanide is more effective than furosemide in this respect. In a double-blind, 24-week placebo-controlled crossover study, 27 patients with essential hypertension were treated in four periods of 6 weeks each, including placebo twice, furosemide 40 mg daily, and bumetanide 1 mg daily. Several metabolic parameters, including serum lipid levels, and blood pressure were assessed. Overall levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were 5%, 12.4%, and 4.8% higher, respectively, during loop diuretic therapy than during placebo treatment. Overall systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were 12 mmHg and 4 mmHg lower, respectively, during loop diuretic therapy than during placebo treatment. Any added effect of bumetanide on serum lipid levels and blood pressure compared with furosemide, however, could not be confirmed. Our results indicate that the loop diuretics bumetanide and furosemide are effective in reducing blood pressure, and influence serum lipid levels markedly less than do thiazide diuretics or chlorthalidone. In addition, these results indicate that differences in blood pressure reduction and serum lipid levels between the two compounds were small and nonsignificant.

A double-blind comparative study of doxazosin and prazosin when administered with beta-blockers or diuretics.

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of doxazosin (once daily) and prazosin (twice daily) were compared in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95 to 114 mm Hg) not adequately controlled by diuretics and beta-blockers. Doxazosin produced significantly greater mean reductions in standing (p = 0.01) and supine (p = 0.04) DBP than did prazosin; there were no significant between-group differences in either mean systolic blood pressure or heart rate. The overall mean daily doses for efficacy-evaluable patients were 4.7 mg of doxazosin and 6.7 mg of prazosin. Sixteen patients (84.2%) treated with doxazosin and 13 patients (56.5%) treated with prazosin were considered therapeutic successes (decrease in standing DBP greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg or to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg with greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg reduction from baseline). Of the 19 efficacy-evaluable patients treated with doxazosin, 15 (78.9%) showed improvement in the severity category of hypertension; an improvement in severity was reported in 14 patients (60.9%) treated with prazosin. Doxazosin produced a more favorable effect on serum lipid levels than did prazosin, although no statistically significant within- or between-group differences were observed. Most side effects experienced with either doxazosin or prazosin were mild or moderate and were tolerated or disappeared with continued treatment. The overall evaluation of toleration was excellent or good for 18 (90%) doxazosin- and 21 (91%) prazosin-treated patients. Clinical efficacy was rated as excellent or good for 16 patients (80%) treated with doxazosin and 15 patients (68%) treated with prazosin.