Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuromuscul Disord ; 32(11-12): 864-869, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283893

RESUMO

Malignant hyperthermia is a life-threatening disorder, which can be prevented by avoiding certain anesthetic agents. Pathogenic variants in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor 1-gene are linked to malignant hyperthermia. We retrospectively studied 15 patients who presented to our clinic with symptoms of muscle dysfunction (weakness, myalgia or cramps) and were later found to have a variant in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor 1-gene. Symptoms, creatine kinase levels, electromyography, muscle biopsy and in vitro contracture test results were reviewed. Six out of the eleven patients, with a variant of unknown significance in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor 1-gene, had a positive in vitro contracture test, indicating malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. In one patient, with two variants of unknown significance, both variants were required to express the malignant hyperthermia-susceptibility trait. Neurologists should consider screening the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor 1-gene in patients with myalgia or cramps, even when few to no abnormalities on ancillary testing.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Maligna , Canal de Liberação de Cálcio do Receptor de Rianodina , Humanos , Contratura/patologia , Hipertermia Maligna/genética , Hipertermia Maligna/patologia , Contração Muscular , Cãibra Muscular/patologia , Músculo Esquelético/patologia , Mialgia/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rianodina , Canal de Liberação de Cálcio do Receptor de Rianodina/genética
2.
Anesthesiology ; 136(6): 940-953, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The introduction of next-generation sequencing into the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders has resulted in an increased number of newly identified RYR1 variants. The hypothesis was that there is an increased referral of patients to malignant hyperthermia units without a personal/family history of adverse anesthetic events suspected to be malignant hyperthermia. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluates patient referral indications and outcomes for those without a history of an adverse anesthetic event. METHODS: Patients referred between 2010 and 2019 to the malignant hyperthermia units in Antwerp, Belgium; Lund, Sweden; Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada were included. Previously tested patients and relatives of previously tested patients were excluded. Data collection included demographics, referral details, muscle contracture, and genetic testing results including Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner scores. Referral indications were categorized into those with a personal/family history of adverse anesthetic event and other indications including exertional and/or recurrent rhabdomyolysis, RYR1 variant(s) detected in diagnostic testing in the neuromuscular clinic without a specific diagnosis (in a family member), diagnosed RYR1-related myopathy (in a family member), idiopathically elevated resting creatine kinase values, exertional heat stroke, and other. RESULTS: A total of 520 medical records were included, with the three most frequent referral indications as follows: personal history of an adverse anesthetic event (211 of 520; 40.6%), family history of an adverse anesthetic event (115 of 520; 22.1%), and exertional and/or recurrent rhabdomyolysis (46 of 520; 8.8%). The proportion of patients referred without a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event increased to 43.6% (133 of 305) between 2015 and 2019 compared to 28.4% (61 of 215) in 2010 to 2014 (P < 0.001). Patients with a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event were more frequently diagnosed as malignant hyperthermia-susceptible (133 of 220; 60.5%) than those without (47 of 120; 39.2%; P < 0.001). Due to missing data, 180 medical records were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients referred to malignant hyperthermia units without a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event has increased, with 39.2% (47 of 120) diagnosed as malignant hyperthermia-susceptible.


Assuntos
Anestésicos , Hipertermia Maligna , Rabdomiólise , Estudos de Coortes , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Hipertermia Maligna/diagnóstico , Hipertermia Maligna/genética , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Rabdomiólise/genética , Canal de Liberação de Cálcio do Receptor de Rianodina/genética
3.
Local Reg Anesth ; 9: 17-24, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27226733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A popliteal block is effective in managing postoperative pain for foot surgery, but since the duration of analgesia is limited following a single-shot popliteal fossa block technique, methods to prolong effective postoperative analgesia are mandatory. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of adjuvants to ropivacaine on the duration of sensory and motor block. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the analgesic effect of clonidine or dexamethasone (DXM) when added to ropivacaine for hallux valgus surgery. After obtaining institutional ethics research board approval and written informed consent, a total of 72 patients were randomly allocated. Fifty-seven of these patients were statistically analyzed. All patients received an ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal fossa block with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%, supplemented with saline, clonidine 100 µg, or DXM 5 mg. The primary end point was time to first pain sensation. Secondary end points were time to complete sensory and motor block regression. RESULTS: Compared to saline, duration to first pain sensation was prolonged by 9 hours (mean ± standard deviation: 31±9 hours) (42%) in the DXM group (P=0.024) and by 6 hours (28±10 hours) (27%) in the clonidine group (P=0.024). Compared to saline, DXM prolonged both complete sensory and motor blockade by 12 hours (25±7 hours) (46%) and 13 hours (36±6 hours) (55%), respectively, while clonidine prolonged complete sensory and motor blockade by 7 hours (30±7 hours) (27%) and 2 hours (22±5 hours) (10%), respectively. DXM prolonged sensory block regression time by 6 hours (21±7 hours) (41%) and clonidine by 2 hours (17±6 hours) (13%) compared to the control group (P=0.006). Similarly, DXM prolonged motor block regression by 7 hours (25±7 hours) (46%) and clonidine by 4 hours (21±4 hours) (19%) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Addition of DXM and clonidine to ropivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative sensory and motor block.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...