[Foreign body perforation of the thoracic esophagus]. / Perforations de l'oesophage thoracique par corps étranger.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation due to foreign body (FB) ingestion is an unusual occurrence. This study aims to define diagnostic difficulties of esophageal perforation by FB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review of patients on our service with FB esophageal perforation was carried out. Diagnosis of perforation was made by CT scan and/or esophagoscopy. Surgery was indicated when a FB could not be removed endoscopically or on a case-by-case basis according to clinical/laboratory, radiologic, and/or endoscopic findings. RESULTS: Seven patients (age range: 27 to 80 years) were admitted for esophageal FB perforation. All patients presented with dysphagia. Two patients presented with signs of sepsis more than 24 hours after FB ingestion. Perforation was diagnosed at initial evaluation in five cases (three by endoscopy, two by CT) and after FB extraction in two cases. Six patients underwent surgery (suture repair: n=4; esophageal exclusion: n=1; mediastinal drainage: n=1). Five surgeries were performed at the initial diagnosis and one after failure of medical management. Mortality was zero; one patient developed esophageal fistula. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of FB esophageal perforation is difficult and is delayed in up to a quarter of patients. The perforation can be due to the FB itself or may be incurred during endoscopic extraction. Both CT and endoscopy are necessary for diagnosis and treatment. Most patients require surgical intervention.

[The Main Gate Syndrome: a new format in mass-casualty victim "surge" management?]. / Le Main Gate Syndrom ou faut-il redéfinir notre conception du triage chirurgical?

INTRODUCTION: Recent suicide bombings pose the novel problem for Trauma Centers of the massive simultaneous arrival of many gravely wounded patients. METHODS: We report the experience of the French-German Military Trauma Group, a Level 2 Trauma Center, in Afghanistan during the wave of suicide bombings in February 2007. RESULTS: Fourteen casualties were received. A first triage was carried out by the U S Army Level I group prior to evacuation. A second surgical triage was carried out with systematic ultrasound exam. Four cases (ISS>25) were re-categorized and underwent emergency surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Suicide bombing in crowded locations near an evacuation hospital may overwhelm the medical resources of the receiving center. It has been referred to as "The Main Gate Syndrome." We introduced the novel concept of a semi-evacuation hospital or receiving center where a second surgical triage was carried out. These exceptional circumstances require open-minded flexibility, a tailored approach, and close cooperation between surgeons and anesthetists to share experience, opinions, and ideas. In the setting of mass casualties, emergency ultrasound exam was shown to be a valuable and effective tool by virtue of its mobility, reproducibility, and immediate results.