The "subscapularis-sparing" approach: a new mini-open technique to repair a humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament lesion.

Anterior approaches to the shoulder involve partial or complete detachment of the subscapularis muscle. We have developed a new technique that permits adequate access to the humeral attachment of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) without any detachment of the subscapularis, and have used this to successfully repair humeral avulsions of glenohumeral ligament lesions. Preliminary diagnostic arthroscopy using air insufflation of the glenohumeral joint is used to identify and grade the lesion. A 1-inch axillary incision is used to access the subscapularis tendon through the deltopectoral approach. Thereafter, anatomic landmarks are identified to expose the lateral aspect of the inferior border of the subscapularis muscle. Blunt dissection is used to separate the musculocapsular plane, and the subscapularis is retracted in an anterosuperior direction. Adequate exposure for visualization and repair of the avulsed IGHL is possible in a majority of cases where this approach is attempted. The use of arthroscopic instruments and suture anchors facilitates suture passage through the mid and posterior regions of the IGHL. If exposure is inadequate, the approach can be easily converted to a conventional L-shaped tenotomy approach through the lower or upper region of the subscapularis.

Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to establish a consistent methodology for quantifying glenoid bone loss by arthroscopic means. TYPE OF STUDY: This study was an anatomic investigation of glenoid structure and its consistent anatomic landmarks as determined by arthroscopic means in live subjects and by direct measurement in fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. METHODS: We arthroscopically evaluated and measured the location of the bare spot of the glenoid in 56 subjects that had no evidence of instability (average age, 40 years). We also measured the exact location of the glenoid bare spot in 10 cadaver shoulders (average age, 76 years). RESULTS: The bare spot of the glenoid was a consistent reference point from which to determine glenoid bone loss because it was located almost exactly at the center of the circle that was defined by the articular margin of the inferior glenoid below the level of the midglenoid notch. The tightly clustered standard deviations of the bare spot measurements in both the live subjects and the cadaver specimens confirmed its consistent location. CONCLUSIONS: The glenoid bare spot can be used as a central reference point to quantify the percentage bone loss of the inferior glenoid. Such objective measurement of glenoid bone loss can be clinically useful to the surgeon in deciding whether bone grafting is necessary to restore stability to the shoulder with a bone-deficient glenoid.