Caregivers' Contributions to Heart Failure Self-care: An Updated Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: A previous systematic review reporting the contributions of informal, unpaid caregivers to patient heart failure (HF) self-care requires updating to better inform research, practice, and policy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an updated review answering the questions: (1) What specific activities do informal caregivers of adults with HF take part in related to HF self-care? (2) Have the activities that informal caregivers of adults with HF take part in related to HF self-care changed over time? (3) What are the gaps in the science? METHODS: This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Eligible studies involved an informal, unpaid caregiver of an adult with HF as a study variable or participant. Caregiving activities were benchmarked using the theory of self-care in chronic illness. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred fifty-four research reports were identified, of which 64 met criteria. Caregivers' contributions occurred in self-care maintenance (91%), monitoring (54%), and management (46%). Activities performed directly on or to the patient were reported more frequently than activities performed for the patient. Change over time involved the 3 domains differentially. Gaps include ambiguous self-care activity descriptions, inadequate caregiving time quantification, and underrepresented self-care monitoring, supportive, and communication activities. CONCLUSIONS: Newly identified caregiver-reported activities support updating the theory of self-care in chronic illness to include activities currently considered ancillary to HF self-care. Identified gaps highlight the need to define specific caregiving activities, determine task difficulty and burden, and identify caregiver self-care strategy and education needs. Exposing the hidden work of caregiving is essential to inform policy and practice.

Professional identity formation among undergraduate pre-medical students: a scoping review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Professional Identity formation is the process by which learners internalize a profession's values, behaviors, and perceptions. With respect to physicians, this occurs at multiple levels of medical education, including the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education stages. Professional identity formation likely starts even earlier, during the undergraduate pre-medical years but, to date, no known scoping or systematic review has been conducted on this topic. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the literature on professional identity formation among undergraduate pre-medical students. METHODS: This review protocol has been designed following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus, as well as relevant grey literature, conference proceedings, and citations of selected articles. Inclusion criteria are articles (1) written in the English language, (2) involving undergraduate pre-medical students in the USA and Canada, and (3) containing original data about professional identity formation. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the titles, abstracts, and full articles for eligibility. A third reviewer will help resolve any disputes. Once the full text of articles are obtained, data will be abstracted using a standardized form. A narrative summary of findings will then be conducted, as well as a consultation exercise with university pre-medical students, pre-med advisors, and first-year medical students. DISCUSSION: By conducting this scoping review, we expect to gain a better understanding of how the experiences of undergraduate pre-medical students impact their professional identity formation. These findings will help to identify gaps in the literature, to better characterize professional identity formation in the specific context of the undergraduate pre-medical track, and to outline potential approaches to facilitate professional identity formation among undergraduate pre-medical students. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework ( htps://osf.io/nfzxc ).

Operative Time and Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between operative time and peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for relevant articles dating 2000-2020. Relationship of operative time and PJI rate in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) was evaluated by pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Six studies were identified for meta-analysis. TJA lasting greater than 120 minutes had greater odds of PJI (OR, 1.63 [1.00-2.66], p=0.048). Similarly, there were greater odds of PJI for TJA procedures lasting greater than 90 minutes (OR, 1.65 [1.27-2.14]; p<0.001). Separate analyses of TKA (OR, 2.01 [0.76-5.30]) and THA (OR, 1.06 [0.80-1.39]) demonstrated no difference in rates of PJI in cases of operative time ≥ 120 minutes versus cases < 120 minutes (p>0.05 for all). Using any surgical site infection (SSI) as an endpoint, both TJA (OR, 1.47 [1.181.83], p<0.001) and TKA (OR, 1.50 [1.08-2.08]; p=0.016) procedures lasting more versus less than 120 minutes demonstrated significantly higher odds of SSI. Conclusion: Following TJA, rates of SSI and PJI are significantly greater in procedures ≥120 minutes in duration relative to those < 120 minutes. When analyzing TKA separately, higher rates of SSI were observed in procedures ≥ 120 minutes in duration relative to those <120 minutes. Rates of PJI in TKA or THA procedures alone were not significantly impacted by operative time. Level of Evidence: V.

Listening Visits for maternal depression: a meta-analysis.

Listening Visits are a non-directive counseling intervention delivered by nurses to depressed postpartum women. In 2007, Listening Visits were listed as a recommended treatment in British national guidelines. They were removed from the guideline update, due to the small effect size drawn from a meta-analysis of five clinical trials with depressed and non-depressed postpartum women. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide an estimate of the true population effect of Listening Visits as a treatment for maternal depression compared to control conditions. A meta-analytic review was conducted of studies published before October 2020. Inclusion criteria required that the study was a pragmatic or randomized trial of Listening Visits delivered by non-mental health specialists to mothers with elevated symptoms of maternal depression. Post-treatment depression rates for the treatment and control groups were extracted from eligible studies. Six studies met eligibility criteria which included 703 participants. Analyses of observed effect sizes corrected for study artifacts revealed an estimate of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.99) with high heterogeneity (Q = 17.95, p = 0.003, I2 = 72.14). After removing outliers and addressing heterogeneity across observed effect sizes, the meta-analytic estimate across four methodologically similar studies and 651 participants was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.62). The moderate effect size for Listening Visits, considered together with the advantages afforded by how, where, and who provides this treatment, supports Listening Visits as a first-line intervention in a stepped care approach for mothers with mild to moderately severe depression symptoms.

Outpatient antibiotic prescribing for common infections via telemedicine versus face-to-face visits: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of antibiotic prescribing for common infections via telemedicine compared to face-to-face visits. Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase (Elsevier platform) and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify studies comparing frequency of antibiotic prescribing via telemedicine and face-to-face visits without restrictions by publish dates or language used. We conducted meta-analyses of 5 infections: sinusitis, pharyngitis, otitis media, upper respiratory infection (URI) and urinary tract infection (UTI). Random-effect models were used to obtain pooled odds ratios (ORs). Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 estimation and the Cochran Q statistic test. Results: Among 3,106 studies screened, 23 studies (1 randomized control study, 22 observational studies) were included in the systematic literature review. Most of the studies (21 of 23) were conducted in the United States. Studies were substantially heterogenous, but stratified analyses revealed that providers prescribed antibiotics more frequently via telemedicine for otitis media (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.52; I2 = 31%) and pharyngitis (pooled OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; I2 = 0%). We detected no significant difference in the frequencies of antibiotic prescribing for sinusitis (pooled OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06; I2 = 91%), URI (pooled OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.59-2.39; I2 = 100%), or UTI (pooled OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 0.88-7.46; I2 = 91%). Conclusions: Telemedicine visits for otitis media and pharyngitis were associated with higher rates of antibiotic prescribing. The interpretation of these findings requires caution due to substantial heterogeneity among available studies. Large-scale, well-designed studies with comprehensive assessment of antibiotic prescribing for common outpatient infections comparing telemedicine and face-to-face visits are needed to validate our findings.

An Integrative Review of Self-Management Interventions for Treatment Sequelae in Adult Survivors.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Self-management interventions support cancer survivors in addressing the consequences of treatment. With post-treatment survivors living longer, it is critical to know how research responds to their changing needs. LITERATURE SEARCH: A comprehensive search of the CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, and PubMed® databases was performed. Articles were included if the self-management intervention was conducted on cancer-free adult survivors after completing primary treatment. DATA EVALUATION: Each study was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. SYNTHESIS: 38 articles were included. The majority of the interventions were designed for short-term survivors, with limited interventions found to support the self-management of long-term cancer survivors. When implementing self-management support, there is a need to use theoretical frameworks that can respond to the changing needs of cancer survivors over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future research should provide support for long-term survivors. Oncology nurses can use the results of this review to identify gaps in the self-management education provided to cancer survivors.

Examining the Reach and Impact of a Systematic Review Service.

This case study describes the process librarians at a large research university used to evaluate a systematic review searching service. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies with a local, health sciences author. Data on librarian involvement, search quality, and standards adherence were recorded. Results of the assessment indicate a gradual increase in librarian authorship or acknowledgement over time, a moderate improvement in adherence to reporting standards over time, and insight into which departments better adhere to standards. Ideas for improving the quality and reach of the service while ensuring sustainability are discussed.

Conceptual and operational definition of nursing outcomes regarding the breastfeeding establishment.

OBJECTIVE: to construct conceptual and operational definitions of Nursing Outcomes "Breastfeeding establishment: infant (1000)" and "Breastfeeding establishment: maternal (1001)". METHOD: integrative literature review in the following databases: PUBMED (United States National Library of Medicine); LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature); CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); SciVerse SCOPUS; Web of Science; BDENF (Brazilian Nursing Database) and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). The gray literature was explored to elucidate topics not covered by the articles. Of 3242 articles, 96 were selected to be read in full, and 43 were used for constructing the definitions. Five theses, three dissertations, three books and two manuals were selected. RESULTS: all the results were reviewed. The definitions facilitated the improvement of the content proposed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification, favoring its application in clinical practice and supporting the development of research and teaching. CONCLUSION: it was proposed to change the definition of the two outcomes, as well as to change the title of one of them to "Breastfeeding establishment: newborn & infant" (1000), modifying seven of its indicators and excluding one. For the outcome related to the mother, it was proposed to modify two indicators and exclude one.

Revisão dos indicadores para os Resultados de Enfermagem relacionados ao estabelecimento da amamentação / Review of indicators of the Nursing Outcomes related to breastfeeding establishment

O objetivo foi identificar na literatura os indicadores dos Resultados de Enfermagem relacionados ao "Estabelecimento da amamentação". Revisão Integrativa da literatura, que abrangeu estudos das bases de dados LILACS, PUBMED, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, BDENF e EMBASE, em Português, Inglês e Espanhol, publicados de 2013 a 2017. Identificados 43 estudos, que contemplaram 17 dos 18 indicadores do "Estabelecimento da amamentação: mãe" e 12 dos 13 indicadores do "Estabelecimento da amamentação: lactente". Quatro indicadores poderiam ser incluídos, segundo a análise dos dados. A maioria dos indicadores propostos pela Classificação dos Resultados de Enfermagem apresentou suporte na literatura, embora alguns demandem ajustes para descrição mais objetiva dos aspectos avaliados. Indicadores podem orientar a avaliação da amamentação de forma contínua, bem como da efetividade das intervenções, além de tornarem o registro padronizado e poderem auxiliar o processo educativo de estudantes e enfermeiros.

The objective of this study was to identify indicators of Nursing Outcomes related to "Breastfeeding Establishment" in the literature. This was an integrative literature review that included studies from LILACS, PUBMED, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, BDENF and EMBASE databases, written in Portuguese, English and Spanish, and published from 2013 to 2017. The 43 studies that were identified address 17 of the 18 "Breastfeeding Establishment: Maternal" indicators, and 12 of the 13 "Breastfeeding Establishment: Infant" indicators. Four indicators could be included, according to the data analysis. Most of the indicators proposed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification presented support in the literature, although some of them need to be adjusted for more objective description of the aspects evaluated. Indicators can continuously guide breastfeeding assessment; they can also guide the assessment on intervention effectiveness and support the learning process of students and nurses.

Conceptual and operational definition of nursing outcomes regarding the breastfeeding establishment / Definição conceitual e operacional dos resultados de enfermagem sobre o estabelecimento da amamentação / Definición conceptual y operacional de los resultados de enfermería sobre el establecimiento de la lactancia materna

Objective: to construct conceptual and operational definitions of Nursing Outcomes "Breastfeeding establishment: infant (1000)" and "Breastfeeding establishment: maternal (1001)". Method: integrative literature review in the following databases: PUBMED (United States National Library of Medicine); LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature); CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); SciVerse SCOPUS; Web of Science; BDENF (Brazilian Nursing Database) and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). The gray literature was explored to elucidate topics not covered by the articles. Of 3242 articles, 96 were selected to be read in full, and 43 were used for constructing the definitions. Five theses, three dissertations, three books and two manuals were selected. Results: all the results were reviewed. The definitions facilitated the improvement of the content proposed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification, favoring its application in clinical practice and supporting the development of research and teaching. Conclusion: it was proposed to change the definition of the two outcomes, as well as to change the title of one of them to "Breastfeeding establishment: newborn & infant" (1000), modifying seven of its indicators and excluding one. For the outcome related to the mother, it was proposed to modify two indicators and exclude one.

Objetivo: construir definições conceituais e operacionais dos Resultados de Enfermagem "Estabelecimento da amamentação: lactente (1000)" e "Estabelecimento da amamentação: mãe (1001)". Método: revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases de dados: PubMed (Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina dos Estados Unidos); LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde); CINAHL (Índice Cumulativo de Enfermagem e Literatura Aliada em Saúde); SciVerse SCOPUS; Web of Science; BDENF (Base de Dados de Enfermagem Brasileira) e EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). A literatura cinzenta foi explorada para a elucidação de tópicos não abordados pelos artigos. De 3242 artigos, 96 foram selecionados para a leitura na íntegra e 43, utilizados na construção das definições. Selecionaram-se cinco teses, três dissertações, três livros e dois manuais. Resultados: todo o conteúdo dos resultados foi revisado. As definições facilitaram o aprimoramento do conteúdo proposto pela Nursing Outcomes Classification, favorecendo sua aplicação na prática clínica e sustentação para o desenvolvimento de pesquisas e ensino. Conclusão: foi proposta mudança na definição dos dois resultados, bem como alteração do título de um deles para Estabelecimento da amamentação: recém-nascido & lactente (1000), com alterações em sete de seus indicadores e a exclusão de um. Para o resultado relacionado à mãe, foram propostas modificações em dois indicadores e exclusão de um.

Objetivo: construir definiciones conceptuales y operacionales de los Resultados de Enfermería "Establecimiento de la lactancia materna: lactante (1000)" y "Establecimiento de la lactancia materna: madre (1001)". Método: revisión integrativa de la literatura en las bases de datos: PUBMED (Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos); LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud); CINAHL (Índice Acumulativo de Enfermería y Literatura Aliada en Salud); SciVerse SCOPUS; Web of Science; BDENF (Base de Datos de Enfermería Brasileña) y EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). Se exploró literatura gris para dilucidar tópicos no abordados por los artículos. De 3242 artículos, se seleccionaron 96 para lectura completa y se emplearon 43 en la construcción de las definiciones. Se seleccionaron cinco tesis, tres disertaciones, tres libros y dos manuales. Resultados: se revisó todo el contenido de los resultados. Las definiciones facilitaron el perfeccionamiento del contenido propuesto por Nursing Outcomes Classification, lo que favorece su aplicación en la práctica clínica y respaldo para desarrollo de investigaciones y enseñanza. Conclusión: se propuso un cambio en la definición de los dos resultados, así como la modificación del título de uno de ellos a Establecimiento de la lactancia materna : recién nacido y lactante (1000), con modificaciones en siete de sus indicadores y la exclusión de un indicador. Para el resultado relacionado con la madre, se propusieron modificaciones en dos indicadores y la exclusión de un indicador.

Tobacco Use and Risk of Wound Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the association between tobacco use and the risk of any wound complication and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty procedures. METHODS: Relevant articles published before January 2018 were identified by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for end points of any wound complication and PJI. Additional analyses were performed to evaluate risks between current, former, and non-tobacco users. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Tobacco users had a significantly higher risk of wound complications (OR, 1.78 [1.32-2.39]) and PJI (OR, 2.02 [1.47-2.77]) compared to non-tobacco users. Compared to non-tobacco users, there was an increased risk of PJI among current (OR, 2.16 [1.57-2.97] and former (OR, 1.52 [1.16-1.99]) tobacco users. Current tobacco users also had a significantly increased risk of PJI compared to former tobacco users (OR, 1.52 [1.07-2.14]). CONCLUSION: Tobacco use before total hip and total knee arthroplasty significantly increases the risk of wound complications and PJI. This increased risk is present for both current and former tobacco users. However, former tobacco users had a significantly lower risk of wound complications and PJI compared to current tobacco users, suggesting that cessation of tobacco use before TJA can help to mitigate these observed risks.

Effectiveness of active and passive warming for the prevention of inadvertent hypothermia in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative hypothermia is a common complication of anesthesia that can result in negative outcomes. The purpose of this review is to answer the question: Does the type of warming intervention influence the frequency or severity of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) in surgical patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia? DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Perioperative care areas. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing surgery with neuraxial anesthesia. INTERVENTION: Perioperative active warming (AW) or passive warming (PW). MEASUREMENTS: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials; adults undergoing surgery with neuraxial anesthesia; comparison(s) of AW and PW; and temperature measured at end of surgery/upon arrival in the Postanesthesia Care Unit. Exclusion criteria were: no full-text available; not published in English; studies of: combined neuraxial and general anesthesia, warm intravenous or irrigation fluids without using AW, and rewarming after hypothermia. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and titles, and selected records following full-text review. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to evaluate study quality. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: Of 1587 records, 25 studies (2048 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Eleven studies (1189 patients) comparing AW versus PW were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis found that intraoperative AW is more effective than PW in reducing the incidence of IPH during neuraxial anesthesia (RR=0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.83; p<0.0001; I2=32%). The qualitative synthesis revealed that IPH continues despite current AW technologies. CONCLUSIONS: During neuraxial anesthesia, AW reduces IPH more effectively than PW. Even with AW, IPH persists in some patients. Continued innovation in AW technology and additional comparative effectiveness research studying different AW methods are needed.

Assessment of Service Desk Quality at an Academic Health Sciences Library.

Due to an identified need for formal assessment, a small team of librarians designed and administered a survey to gauge the quality of customer service at their academic health sciences library. Though results did not drive major changes to services, several important improvements were implemented and a process was established to serve as a foundation for future use. This article details the assessment process used and lessons learned during the project.

Five-Year Bibliometric Review of Genomic Nursing Science Research.

PURPOSE: This bibliometric review profiles the focus, dissemination, and impact of genomic nursing science articles from 2010 to 2014. DESIGN: Data-based genomic nursing articles by nursing authors and articles by non-nurse principal investigators funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research were categorized into the Genomic Nursing Science Blueprint nursing areas. METHODS: Bibliometric content analysis was used. FINDINGS: A total of 197 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 60.3% were on biologic plausibility, 12.1% on client self-management, 11.1% on decision making or decision support, 8.1% on family, and 4.0% on communication, with the remaining 4.0% of articles focused on other topics. Few (11.6%) addressed healthcare disparities in the study purpose. Thirty-four references (17.2%) were cited 10 or more times. CONCLUSIONS: Research-based genomic nursing science articles are in the discovery phase of inquiry. All topics were investigated in more than one country. Healthcare disparities were addressed in few studies. Research findings from interdisciplinary teams were disseminated beyond nursing audiences, with findings addressing biologic discovery, decision making or support, and family being cited most frequently. Gaps in the reviewed articles included cross-cutting themes, ethics, and clinical utility. Interdisciplinary research is needed to document clinical and system outcomes of genomic nursing science implementation in health care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the review identifies areas that are encountered in clinical practice, relevance to practice will depend on evaluation of findings and subsequent development of clinical guidelines.

Developing a best practices plan for tutorials in a multi-library system.

In 2010, the University of Iowa's library system administration created a task force to conduct a reevaluation of tools and spaces used for video tutorial creation across a multi-library system. Following this effort, a working group was charged with improving documentation and staff awareness of resources for developing video tutorials. The group observed that librarians were often independently creating videos that were variable in quality, lacked consistent branding, and were not often shared with others. This article will describe experiences at the Hardin Library for the Health Sciences at the University of Iowa in selecting video tutorial software, and striving to establish a more structured process, including team-developed guidelines, for tutorial creation in a multi-library system. Project limitations and areas for future work will also be presented.