RESUMO
Purpose: Opioid therapy for managing chronic pain remains a challenge, as providers must weigh the medical benefit to the patient with the risk of adverse events. Manipulation of many extended-release (ER) opioid formulations may lead to increased serious medical outcomes or death. The economic burden of opioid use disorders due to opioid misuse and abuse may vary depending on which abuse deterrent opioid formulation is prescribed. The study aimed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare costs of chronic pain patients treated with two different abuse-deterrent opioid formulations, Xtampza ER and reformulated OxyContin. Methods: The source of data was IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Medicare Supplemental database, from January 2016 through February 2020. Patients with chronic pain were assigned to either the Xtampza ER or the OxyContin cohort based on the initial ER opioid prescription set as the index date. Continuous healthcare coverage was required during a minimum 3-month pre-index and 9-month post-index periods. Pre-index patients' characteristics were analyzed. Healthcare costs of Xtampza ER vs OxyContin were assessed in the post-index period. Results: After applying selection criteria, 464 patients were observed in the Xtampza ER cohort versus 1927 patients in the OxyContin cohort. In unmatched patients, ER opioid costs were lower for Xtampza ER than OxyContin ($2645 vs $3141; p<0.001), which ultimately led to lower total prescription costs for the Xtampza ER cohort compared to the OxyContin cohort ($7492 vs $8754; p=0.016). In matched patients, the total healthcare costs were significantly lower in the Xtampza ER cohort than in the OxyContin cohort, $22,630 vs $28,386 (p=0.005), respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that Xtampza ER may result in lower healthcare costs than OxyContin for a population of chronic pain patients switching from immediate release oxycodone based on real-world data.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a guideline on opioid prescribing for primary care physicians. Patients with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid therapy were surveyed to assess the incidence and impact of opioid dose reduction following this guideline's promulgation. METHODS: Members of an advocacy organization for people with chronic pain were invited to participate in a 16-item, anonymous, online survey conducted in September/October 2017. Eligibility requirements included current treatment of ≥7 months' duration for chronic pain with the same extended-release (ER)/long-acting (LA) opioid. The final sample consisted of respondents who reported being on the same ER/LA opioid for ≥1 year and excluded respondents whose 1) ER/LA opioid dose increased; 2) ER/LA opioid dose decreased and immediate-release (IR) opioid dose increased; and 3) ER/LA opioid dose was unchanged and IR opioid dose was changed. Survey results were analyzed using z-test to ascertain differences between proportion of responses for ER/LA opioid dose decreased vs dose unchanged groups. RESULTS: Of the 511 eligible respondents, 362 respondents were included in the final sample. In the final sample, the subgroup with decreased ER/LA opioid dose (n=149) was significantly more likely (P≤ 0.05) than those who reported no dose change (n=213) to rate their condition as "worse" for level of pain (73.2 vs 33.3%), level of function (67.8 vs 31.5%), mental health (64.4 vs 32.9%), ability to work (62.9% of 97 respondents vs 33.8% of 145 respondents), and interpersonal relationships (48.3 vs 25.8%) during the previous 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this Internet-based survey of people with chronic pain, reduction of ER/LA opioid dose was associated with reduced pain control and diminished function. These results indicate a need for further guidance on how to apply the CDC guideline to patients with chronic pain who are stable on long-term opioid therapy.
