Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacy Services for Phase 1 Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Phase 1 clinical trials have challenges relative to later-phase clinical trials. As of April 2020, there were 71 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials at the Johns Hopkins Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (SKCCC), and limited clinical pharmacy services are dedicated to the unique needs of phase 1 clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the current phase 1 cancer-specific clinical pharmacy services at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated institutions, and to develop a framework for the implementation of these services at Johns Hopkins Medicine SKCCC. METHODS: We queried the current pharmacy practices for phase 1 cancer clinical trials at NCI-designated institutions through an e-mailed 20-question national online survey to 208 pharmacists. The recipients were asked to rate how often specific pharmacy services were performed, using a 4-point Likert scale of rarely/never (<10%), sometimes (10%-49%), often (50%-80%), or almost always (>80%). The services were grouped into pretrial implementation support, phase 1 trial implementation support, medication profile review, medication therapy management, and miscellaneous support. Using the survey results, a framework for phase 1 trial clinical pharmacy services was developed concurrently to prioritize protocol complexity, monitoring requirements, and clinical pharmacy interventions. RESULTS: Of the 208 surveys e-mailed, 45 recipients responded, for an overall survey response rate of 22%. The responses were divided into 2 subgroups for the institutions that currently conduct phase 1 cancer clinical trials, including institutions with >40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials and institutions with ≤40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials. The institutions with >40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials were more likely to have pharmacists involved with direct participant care (47% vs 18.8%, respectively) and document medication lists for phase 1 trial participants (41% vs 18.8%, respectively) than institutions with ≤40 active phase 1 cancer clinical trials. The survey results assisted in developing a framework to classify drug regimens as platinum level (ie, higher complexity) or standard level (ie, lower or average complexity) to prioritize clinical pharmacy services based on their complexity level. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of current phase 1 clinical trial pharmacy practices at NCI institutions enabled the development of a framework for increased collaboration with research teams and phase 1 clinical trial-specific clinical pharmacy services within Johns Hopkins Medicine SKCCC.

Establishing an investigational drugs and research residency at an academic medical center.

PURPOSE: The development, structure, and implementation of an innovative residency program designed to help meet a growing need for pharmacists with specialized expertise in investigational drug use and clinical research are described. SUMMARY: Clinical research has become an increasingly complex field, but prior to 2017 there were no U.S. specialty residency training programs focused on pharmacists' role in drug development and the care of patients enrolled in clinical trials. In 2016 Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) launched an initiative to develop residency training standards specific to the areas of investigational drug use and clinical research. The residency development process consisted of creation of a residency development committee; a needs assessment, including formation of a diverse panel of internal and external experts to guide identification of key competency areas and development of residency goals and objectives; design of the program's structure, including a framework for required and elective rotations; submission of an application for pre-candidate status to the ASHP Commission on Credentialing; and recruitment efforts. CONCLUSION: The JHH investigational drugs and research residency, a combined PGY1 and PGY2 program with 5 competency areas, 14 goals, and 49 objectives, was granted pre-candidate status by ASHP in November 2016. The first resident began the program in June 2017.

Moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk for relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia: a review of clinical considerations.

PURPOSE: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B cell leukemia. Purine analogs are the mainstay of treatment of HCL, but relapse after purine analog therapy is common. Outcomes of treatment of relapsed/refractory HCL typically diminish with each successive line of therapy. Moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk is a novel recombinant immunotoxin approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory HCL who have received at least two prior therapies, including a purine analog. This article reviews HCL treatment, focusing on moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk, its place in therapy, considerations for preparation and administration, and strategies for prevention and management of toxicities. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database from inception to January 2019, using the following terms: moxetumomab, hairy cell leukemia, relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia, immunotoxin, and CD22. The package insert and available posters and abstracts were also reviewed. RESULTS: FDA approval of moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk was based on a phase III single-arm, open-label trial in 80 patients. Treatment with moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk yielded a durable complete response rate of 30% with a median duration of response that had not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 16.7 months. The objective response rate was 75% based on blinded independent central review. The most common adverse reactions were infusion-related reactions, edema, nausea, fatigue, headache, pyrexia and anemia. Serious adverse events include capillary leak syndrome and hemolytic uremic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians providing care for patients receiving moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk should be aware of the strategies required for safe administration, including the management of serious adverse events.