Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acad Med ; 93(5): 724-728, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29116975

RESUMO

PROBLEM: Progress testing of medical knowledge has advantages over traditional medical school examination strategies. However, little is known about its use in assessing medical students' clinical skills or their integration of clinical skills with necessary science knowledge. The authors previously reported on the feasibility of the Progress Clinical Skills Examination (PCSE), piloted with a group of early learners. This subsequent pilot test studied the exam's validity to determine whether the PCSE is sensitive to the growth in students' clinical skills across the four years of medical school. APPROACH: In 2014, 38 medical student volunteers (years 1-4) in the traditional 2 + 2 curriculum at Michigan State University College of Human Medicine participated in the eight-station PCSE. Faculty and standardized patients assessed students' clinical skills, and faculty assessed students' responses to postencounter necessary science questions. Students performed pretest self-assessment across multiple measures and completed a posttest evaluation of their PCSE experience. OUTCOMES: Student performance generally increased by year in medical school for communication, history-taking, and physical examination skills. Necessary science knowledge increased substantially from first-year to second-year students, with less change thereafter. Students felt the PCSE was a fair test of their clinical skills and provided an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of the related necessary science. NEXT STEPS: The authors have been piloting a wider pool of cases. In 2016, they adopted the PCSE as part of the summative assessment strategy for the medical school's new integrated four-year curriculum. Continued assessment of student performance trajectories is planned.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 84(8): 918-24, 2011 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22010771

RESUMO

Premenstrual syndrome is defined as recurrent moderate psychological and physical symptoms that occur during the luteal phase of menses and resolve with menstruation. It affects 20 to 32 percent of premenopausal women. Women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder experience affective or somatic symptoms that cause severe dysfunction in social or occupational realms. The disorder affects 3 to 8 percent of premenopausal women. Proposed etiologies include increased sensitivity to normal cycling levels of estrogen and progesterone, increased aldosterone and plasma renin activity, and neurotransmitter abnormalities, particularly serotonin. The Daily Record of Severity of Problems is one tool with which women may self-report the presence and severity of premenstrual symptoms that correlate with the criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision. Symptom relief is the goal for treatment of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. There is limited evidence to support the use of calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin B6 supplementation, and insufficient evidence to support cognitive behavior therapy. Serotonergic antidepressants (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine) are first-line pharmacologic therapy.


Assuntos
Síndrome Pré-Menstrual/diagnóstico , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Terapias Complementares , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Síndrome Pré-Menstrual/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Pré-Menstrual/terapia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...