RESUMO
The prevalence of high myopia is rising globally. In addition to an increased risk of retinal detachment, high myopia is associated with earlier cataract formation. Patients with myopia are also often more motivated to become spectacle-independent after a lens procedure. However, the use of multifocal intraocular lens (MfIOL) remains controversial for patients with extreme myopia, which is classified as patients with an axial length >28 mm. Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old patient with visually significant cataract and extreme axial myopia >31 mm in both eyes who desired to be spectacle-independent. A preoperative workup revealed a normal macula with peripheral lattice degeneration. On optical coherence tomography, the macula had a normal fovea contour without the presence of a staphyloma. A thorough peripheral examination was performed by a retina specialist which required no prophylactic treatment. Pentacam analysis demonstrated a low spherical aberration and minimal ectasia risk. Cataract surgery was uneventful with a 5 mm laser capsulotomy centered over the visual axis with the placement of a trifocal intraocular lens. Two months after the cataract surgery, the remaining refractive error was corrected with a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis enhancement. The patient achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/15- and uncorrected near visual acuity of J1+ in both eyes. Overall, this case report and review aims to highlight important preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative techniques to improve patient outcomes with MfIOL in patients with extreme myopia.
RESUMO
A 41-year-old female presented to the Willis-Knighton Eye Institute to undergo evaluation for refractive surgery. The patient had a best-corrected visual acuity for a distance of 20/15-1 of the right eye (OD) and 20/15-1 of the left eye (OS) with a manifest refraction of -2.75 OD and -1.75 OS. Near visual acuity was J1+ in both eyes (OU). A trial of a monovision contact lens was successful with the dominant eye selected for distance. The patient was then planned for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) OD only with a plano target. SMILE was performed and was uncomplicated with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/15- on postoperative day one. Two weeks after the initial SMILE procedure, the anterior segment was notable for 1-2+ cells OD. Topical prednisone was changed to difluprednate 0.05% TID OD with improvement in symptoms. However, the anterior chamber cell was never fully resolved by month three. A systemic workup revealed a positive rapid plasma reagin with 1:64 titer and a positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption in a patient never treated for syphilis. The patient was diagnosed with ocular syphilis and received a two-week course of intravenous penicillin G. A slow topical prednisone tapper was performed with the resolution of inflammation by one year. Anterior uveitis after refractive surgery is uncommon. The incidence of anterior uveitis after SMILE is even rarer with no previously documented incidence in the literature. As a result, persistent cell seen in refractive procedures, especially SMILE, is a concerning finding, warranting further workup to rule out underlying systemic diseases including syphilis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the retinal findings in a 25-year-old white woman in whom a diagnosis of Boucher-Neuhäuser Syndrome (BNS) was supported by genetic testing, which identified a missense and novel nonsense mutation in the PNPLA6 gene. METHODS: Observational case report of a 25-year-old woman who presented with primary amenorrhea, cerebellar ataxia, and mild retinal pigmentary abnormalities. Neurologic, endocrine, and genetic evaluations established a diagnosis of BNS. RESULTS: Clinical examination and multimodal imaging documented focal outer retinal and retinal pigment epithelium changes including bilateral foveal stippling and a circular area of hypopigmentation in the superior macula of the left eye. Optical coherence tomography showed a linear area of outer retinal attenuation superonasal to the fovea and multiple foci of pinpoint outer retinal defects in the temporal macula of the left eye. Humphrey visual field 24-2 testing showed nonspecific defects in both eyes. Full-field electroretinography showed no evidence of a generalized retinal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Recognition that the chorioretinal abnormalities occurring in BNS can be rather subtle is essential because the diagnosis of BNS may depend on their detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the ophthalmic literature of mild chorioretinal changes in a patient with BNS testing positive for a mutation in the PNPLA6 gene.
