RESUMO
Interleukin-7 (IL-7) is considered a critical regulator of memory CD8+ T cell homeostasis, but this is primarily based on analysis of circulating and not tissue-resident memory (TRM) subsets. Furthermore, the cell-intrinsic requirement for IL-7 signaling during memory homeostasis has not been directly tested. Using inducible deletion, we found that Il7ra loss had only a modest effect on persistence of circulating memory and TRM subsets and that IL-7Rα was primarily required for normal basal proliferation. Loss of IL-15 signaling imposed heightened IL-7Rα dependence on memory CD8+ T cells, including TRM populations previously described as IL-15-independent. In the absence of IL-15 signaling, IL-7Rα was upregulated, and loss of IL-7Rα signaling reduced proliferation in response to IL-15, suggesting cross-regulation in memory CD8+ T cells. Thus, across subsets and tissues, IL-7 and IL-15 act in concert to support memory CD8+ T cells, conferring resilience to altered availability of either cytokine.
RESUMO
Memory CD8 T cells (Tmem) can be activated into innate-like killers by cytokines like IL-12, IL-15, and/or IL-18; but mechanisms regulating this phenomenon (termed bystander activation) are not fully resolved. We found strain-intrinsic deficiencies in bystander activation using specific pathogen-free mice, whereby basal IL-4 signals antagonize IL-18 sensing. We show that therapeutic and helminth-induced IL-4 impairs protective bystander-mediated responses against pathogens. However, this IL-4/IL-18 axis does not completely abolish bystander activation but rather tunes the expression of direct versus indirect mediators of cytotoxicity (granzymes and interferon-γ, respectively). We show that antigen-experience overrides strain-specific deficiencies in bystander activation, leading to uniform IL-18 receptor expression and enhanced capacity for bystander activation/cytotoxicity. Our data highlight that bystander activation is not a binary process but tuned/deregulated by other cytokines that are elevated by contemporaneous infections. Further, our findings underscore the importance of antigen-experienced Tmem to dissect the contributions of bystander Tmem in health and disease.
RESUMO
Cancer is among the most common causes of death for dogs (and cats) and humans in the developed world, even though it is uncommon in wildlife and other domestic animals. We provide a rationale for this observation based on recent advances in our understanding of the evolutionary basis of cancer. Over the course of evolutionary time, species have acquired and fine-tuned adaptive cancer protective mechanisms that are intrinsically related to their energy demands, reproductive strategies, and expected lifespan. These cancer protective mechanisms are general across species and/or specific to each species and their niche, and they do not seem to be limited in diversity. The evolutionarily acquired cancer-free longevity that defines a species' life history can explain why the relative cancer risk, rate, and incidence are largely similar across most species in the animal kingdom despite differences in body size and life expectancy. The molecular, cellular, and metabolic events that promote malignant transformation and cancerous growth can overcome these adaptive, species-specific protective mechanisms in a small proportion of individuals, while independently, some individuals in the population might achieve exceptional longevity. In dogs and humans, recent dramatic alterations in healthcare and social structures have allowed increasing numbers of individuals in both species to far exceed their species-adapted longevities (by 2-4 times) without allowing the time necessary for compensatory natural selection. In other words, the cancer protective mechanisms that restrain risk at comparable levels to other species for their adapted lifespan are incapable of providing cancer protection over this recent, drastic and widespread increase in longevity.
