Individual estimation of exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in jobs commonly held by women.

Exposures to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields have not been documented extensively in occupations besides the work environments of electric or telephone utilities. A 1980-1993 study of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Québec, Canada, gathered detailed information about the occupations of 491 mothers of ALL cases and mothers of a similar number of healthy controls. This information was combined with published data on the intensities of ELF magnetic fields associated with sources or work environments to estimate ELF magnetic field exposures for a wide range of jobs commonly held by women. Estimated exposures for 61 job categories ranged from 0.03 to 0.68 microT; the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were 0.135, 0.17, and 0.23 microT, respectively. By job category, the most highly exposed jobs (>0.23 microT) included bakery worker, cashier, cook and kitchen worker, electronics worker, residential and industrial sewing machine operator, and textile machine operator. By work environment, the most highly exposed job categories were electronics worker in an assembly plant (0.70 microT) and sewing machine operators in a textile factory (0.68 microT) and shoe factory (0.66 microT). These results provide new information on expected levels of exposure in a wide range of jobs commonly held by women.

Exposures of children in Canada to 60-Hz magnetic and electric fields.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize personal exposures of Canadian children to 60-Hz magnetic and electric fields and explain the variability. METHODS: Altogether 382 Canadian children up to 15 years of age wore meters recording 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields over 2 days. Meter location was noted. Thereafter, meters measured fields in the center of the children's bedrooms for 24 hours. Personal exposures were calculated for home, school or day care, outside the home, bedroom at night, and all categories combined (total). RESULTS: The arithmetic mean (AM) was 0.121 microT [geometric mean (GM): 0.085 microT), range 0.01-0.8 microT] for total magnetic fields. Fifteen percent of the total exposures exceeded 0.2 microT. The AM of the total electric fields was 14.4 (GM 12.3, range 0.82-64.7) V/m. By location category, the highest and lowest magnetic fields occurred at home during the day (0.142 microT) and during the night (0.112 microT), respectively. Measurements during sleep provided the highest correlation with total magnetic field exposure. Province of measurement explained 14.7% of the variation in the logarithms of total magnetic fields, and season accounted for an additional 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified differences in children's magnetic field exposures between provinces. Measurements at night provided the best surrogate for predicting total magnetic field exposure, followed by at-home exposure and 24-hour bedroom measurements. Electrical heating and air conditioning, wiring type, and type of housing appear to be promising indicators of magnetic field levels.

Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia in Canada.

In a case-control study of childhood leukemia in relation to exposure to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF), 399 children resident in five Canadian provinces who were diagnosed at ages 0-14 years between 1990 and 1994 (June 1995 in British Columbia and Quebec) were enrolled, along with 399 controls. Exposure assessment included 48-hour personal EMF measurement, wire coding and magnetic field measurements for subjects' residences from conception to diagnosis/reference date, and a 24-hour magnetic field bedroom measurement. Personal magnetic fields were not related to risk of leukemia (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.95, p for trend = 0.73) or acute lymphatic leukemia (OR = 0.93, p for trend = 0.64). There were no clear associations with predicted magnetic field exposure 2 years before the diagnosis/reference date or over the subject's lifetime or with personal electric field exposure. A statistically nonsignificant elevated risk of acute lymphatic leukemia was observed with very high wiring configurations among residences of subjects 2 years before the diagnosis/reference date (OR = 1.72 compared with underground wiring, 95% confidence interval 0.54-5.45). These results provide little support for a relation between power-frequency EMF exposure and risk of childhood leukemia.

Task-based estimation of past exposures to 60-hertz magnetic and electric fields at an electrical utility.

OBJECTIVES: Past exposures of electric utility workers to extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic (B) and electric fields (E) in Quebec were estimated. METHODS: The current intensities were measured and durations of exposures determined for tasks or work locations in 14 job categories. Past task or location intensities were extrapolated from the present on the basis of interviews with long-term workers and utility personnel. Past task or location durations were estimated for the long-term workers. Time-weighted average (TWA) exposures for past periods were reconstructed for jobs from the intensity and duration estimates. RESULTS: Magnetic fields were estimated to have increased the most over time for substation and distribution-line jobs. Magnetic field exposures for jobs in the generation and transmission of electricity were estimated to have increased very little. For substation jobs, the ratios of magnetic fields in 1945 to those in 1990 ranged from 0.42 to 0.69; the corresponding figures for distribution-line jobs ranged from 0.36 to 0.94. For electric fields in substations, the estimated increase over time was less than for magnetic fields, the 1945:1990 ratios ranging from 0.59 to 0.88. For the distribution line jobs, the 1945:1990 ratios for electric fields were less than 1.0 in 4 cases (0.6 to 0.89), more than 1.0 in 3 others (1.13 to 2.01) and unchanged in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of TWA exposures allowed changes in the intensity and the duration of exposures to be considered separately. Documentation of the intensity and duration of exposures for different tasks allows exposure reconstruction for jobs that have ceased to exist. The method is applicable elsewhere if exposure-monitoring records allow the level and duration of exposures for tasks or locations to be calculated and if estimates of past durations and intensities of exposures can be reliably obtained.

Exposure to 60-Hz magnetic and electric fields at a Canadian electric utility.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to estimate exposure to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic and electric fields in the Québec electrical utility Hydro-Quebec. METHODS: Personal exposures to ELF magnetic and electric fields were measured for workers randomly selected from 32 job categories at Hydro-Québec. Weekly arithmetic and geometric means, and other indices of exposure were estimated from 465 worker-weeks of data. RESULTS: By job category, the arithmetic means of the ELF magnetic field ranged from 0.09 to 2.36 microT. Those of the ELF electric field exposures ranged from 2.5 to 400 V.m-1. Within each field, correlations of either the arithmetic or geometric means with alternative indices, including an index of the time rate of change, were generally high (r > or = 0.8). Exceptions were the 20th percentile of the electric means and the proportion of time above 12.4 and 100 microT. The day-to-day variation of exposure was greater than the variation between workers. The median between-day and between-worker components of variance (as geometric standard deviations) by job category were 2.13 and 1.71 for magnetic fields (2.24 and 1.81 for electric fields). CONCLUSIONS: Substation workers, hydroelectric generating station operators, and cable splicers showed the highest arithmetic means for 60-Hz magnetic fields above 1 microT. For 60-Hz electric fields, forestry workers, equipment electricians in 735 kV substations, and distribution linemen (contact method) had arithmetic mean exposures greater than 100 W.m-1. Of the total variance in the logarithms of the weekly magnetic and electric field means, job category explained 49.6% and 59.5%, respectively.

Electric and magnetic field exposures for people living near a 735-kilovolt power line.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a 735-kV transmission line on the electric and magnetic field exposures of people living at the edge of the line's right of way. Exposure of 18 adults, mostly white-collar workers, living in different bungalows located 190-240 feet from the line (exposed subjects) was compared to that of 17 adults living in similar residences far away from any transmission line. Each subject carried a Positron meter for 24 hr during 1 workday, which measured 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields every minute. All measurements were carried out in parallel for exposed and unexposed subjects during the same weeks between September and December. During measurements the average loading on the line varied between 600 and 1100 A. The average magnetic field intensity while at home was 4.4 times higher among exposed subjects than unexposed (7.1 versus 1.6 mG, p = 0.0001) and 6.2 times higher when considering only the sleeping period (6.8 versus 1.1 mG, p = 0.0001). Based on the 24-hr measurement, average magnetic field exposure was three times higher among the exposed. Electric field intensity was also higher among the exposed while at home (26.3 versus 14.0 V/m, p = 0.03). Magnetic field intensity among the exposed was positively correlated with the loading on the line (r = 0.8, p = 0.001). Percentage of time above a magnetic field threshold (2 mG or 7.8 mG) was a good indicator to distinguish the two types of exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of indices of ambient exposure to 60-hertz electric and magnetic fields.

Occupational, environmental, or domestic exposure of human beings to extremely low-frequency (50- or 60-Hz) electric and magnetic fields varies continuously over time. In epidemiological studies of possible health effects, exposures over long durations must be aggregated in terms of simple summary indices. However, there are many different, biologically plausible, ways of aggregating the data. While awake, each of 20 electric utility personnel and 16 office workers had provided minute-by-minute measures of incident electric (V/m) and magnetic (muT) fields over a 7-day period via personal dosimeters. Once the measures were aggregated as means, medians, peaks, and other indices, intercorrelations between all index pairs were calculated; correlation matrices are presented for the utility and office workers both by group and when pooled. Product-moment coefficients (r) greater that .80 were found between the time-weighted arithmetic mean (TWA) and indices that explicitly emphasize short but highly intense exposures, such as peak values and time above thresholds. Medians and geometric means were less highly correlated with the TWA. Use of only a few indices, perhaps the TWA alone, may sacrifice but little statistical power in most epidemiological studies of utility workers exposed to ELF fields. However, correlations between electric-field strength and magnetic-field density were generally quite weak, as were correlations of either with high-frequency transients; these findings underscore the need to measure each of these variables in epidemiological studies. Indices of exposure incurred outside the workplace were less strongly correlated, which may indicate the need to use several indices in general-population studies.

Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter.

One problem that has limited past epidemiologic studies of cancer and exposure to extremely low-frequency (0-100 Hz) electric and magnetic fields has been the lack of adequate methods for assessing personal exposure to these fields. A new 60-Hz electromagnetic field dosimeter was tested to assess occupational and residential exposures of a group of electrical utility workers and a comparison background group over a 7-day period. Comparing work periods only, utility workers' exposures were significantly higher than background levels by a factor of about 10 for electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields and by a factor of 171 for high-frequency transient electric (HFTE) fields. When overall weekly time-weighted averages combining work and nonwork exposures were compared, ratios of the exposed to background groups were lower. B and HFTE exposure ratios remained statistically significant, with values of 3.5 and 58, respectively, whereas the electric field exposure ratio was no longer significant, with a value of 1.7. E-field exposures of the background group were the highest during the nonwork period, probably reflecting the use of electrical appliances at home. Residential E- and B-field exposures were in the same range as published results from other surveys, whereas occupational E-field exposures tended to be lower than exposures reported in other studies. The high variability associated with occupational exposures probably accounts for the latter discrepancy. Worker acceptance of wearing the dosimeter was good: 95% of participants found it to be of little or no inconvenience while at work. At home, 37% found the device to be inconvenient in its present form but would not object to wearing a slightly smaller and lighter dosimeter.